- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 397
- Reaction score
- 114
It depends on the school. My school has the interviewer fill out a one page form that has ~10 questions.
We are supposed to answer those 10 questions with supporting material that we gained from interviewing you. There is some ranking going on and also there are some lengthy prompts that require more essay-like responses from the interviewer.
Do you mean our entire applications get ranked? And then they just accept the highest ranked apps?
Also, I don't know if your school is rolling or non-rolling, but I've always been curious about non-rolling schools. Do they pick applicants as they come but just not send anything out until the end of the cycle? Or do they wait to the very end and quickly try to review the hundreds of people that interviewed throughout the cycle? The latter seems quite difficult to me.
I ask because I know some schools say that their interviewers are supposed to be "advocates" for a particular applicant at the next admissions committee meeting. It seems like this is only feasible if the decision on that applicant is made relatively soon. I doubt an interviewer will remember enough about an applicant to be able to advocate for him/her months down the line. The idea of interviewers serving as my advocate has been brought up at many of the non-rolling schools I've been to and really got me thinking about this. I suppose this problem wouldn't exist if all the interviewer had to do was add, essentially, another letter of recommendation to the applicant's file.