Med student interviewer. Ask me anything (AMA).

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I can speak to the example you give. It's a different case than the one here; it's a moot point.

Very rarely do we expect someone to probe and ask if it is the prestigious institution they have in mind. If you think that's why we do it, you'll sadly misinformed and biased.

Typically we say things like that because we're so sick of the follow-up questions of "What was your GPA? SAT score? Blah blah blah blah tell my kid what it takes to get into an Ivy plz" 'cause ya know what? I don't ******* know why I got in. I don't really think I belong here, even as a junior. I don't want to tell you all my stats in high school. That's why we do it in the case you bring up. It's not the same. If you think we're elitist for thinking that those follow-up questions will be asked, it happens much more often than you'd think.

I went to MIT for undergrad, and two summers ago I took an EMT class for credit at a local CC. Because it was a summer course, 60% of the class was in high school and 30% were pre-meds. When, for all they knew, I "went to college in Boston", everything was great! Once someone noticed my college ring (which I wear as a reminder that I never have to go back to that place ever again), all hell broke loose.

Every single test I took after that: "What did you get?" Me: "I did fine." Them: "I got a 92. what did you get?" Me: "I got an A. I'm happy with that." Them: "But what was your score?" Anytime anyone did well on anything, they wanted to know if the beat the guy from MIT. It was annoying.

Secretly, I enjoyed knowing that everyone who wanted to know sooooo badly if they had scored higher never did. 😉 But it was none of their business either way. (Brief aside: Grades were posted on a bulletin board by ID number. One girl in the class actually memorized which ID was mine so she could make a comparison for each grade and judge her self-worth.)

Anyway, yes. While going to some insanely reputable school helps when applying for jobs, apartments, and professional school, it really sucks at a party.

SORRY for derailing the thread, but Inycepoo really hit the nail on the head, particularly with the bolded part.
 
Last edited:
I went to MIT for undergrad, and two summers ago I took an EMT class for credit at a local CC. Because it was a summer course, 60% of the class was in high school and 30% were pre-meds. When, for all they knew, I "went to college in Boston", everything was great! Once someone noticed my college ring (which I wear as a reminder that I never have to go back to that place ever again), all hell broke loose.

Every single test I took after that: "What did you get?" Me: "I did fine." Them: "I got a 92. what did you get?" Me: "I got an A. I'm happy with that." Them: "But what was your score?" Anytime anyone did well on anything, they wanted to know if the beat the guy from MIT. It was annoying.

Secretly, I enjoyed knowing that everyone who wanted to know sooooo badly if they had scored higher never did. 😉 But it was none of their business either way. (Brief aside: Grades were posted on a bulletin board by ID number. One girl in the class actually memorized which ID was mine so she could make a comparison for each grade and judge her self-worth.)

Anyway, yes. While going to some insanely reputable school helps when applying for jobs, apartments, and professional school, it really sucks at a party.

SORRY for derailing the thread, but Inycepoo really hit the nail on the head, particularly with the bolded part.

Lol…I think just about anybody would take that trade off. While I can identify with the slight annoyance factor, If you're privileged enough to go to a top university, I guess this is one of the minor inconveniences you have to deal with, but if ever there was a time to throw around the trite phrase "check your privilege" it is in circumstances like this (note: I'm not saying against you personally - I don't know 99% of your situation, after all - and honestly I'm not trying to start any type of war of words between Ivy Leaguers and the rest of SDN on this thread, I'm just commenting against the attitude in general).

As for a question, the answer to which I'm now curious about based on the couple of posts about where people when to school, and if it was asked my apologies: how do you as an interviewer fight against what I imagine must be inherent bias towards some undergrad institutions and certain undergrad activities? Not just saying if you know a student went to an Ivy League school your more likely to believe them to be a favorable (or perhaps unfavorable, I suppose) applicant, but what about schools you simply didn't like as an undergrad (maybe you visited and people were rude, etc), or perhaps you have a fraternity brother sitting in front of you and you simply hate the Greek system? Clearly I'm sure that preconceived notions are supposed to be disregarded, but interviewers are still human, so do you believe that to be possible?
 
Last edited:
Lol…I think just about anybody would take that trade off. While I can identify with the slight annoyance factor, If you're privileged enough to go to a top university, I guess this is one of the minor inconveniences you have to deal with, but if ever there was a time to throw around the trite phrase "check your privilege" it is in circumstances like this (note: I'm not saying against you personally - I don't know 99% of your situation, after all - and honestly I'm not trying to start any type of war of words between Ivy Leaguers and the rest of SDN on this thread, I'm just commenting against the attitude in general).

As for a question, the answer to which I'm now curious about based on the couple of posts about where people when to school, and if it was asked my apologies: how do you as an interviewer fight against what I imagine must be inherent bias towards some undergrad institutions and certain undergrad activities? Not just saying if you know a student went to an Ivy League school your more likely to believe them to be a favorable (or perhaps unfavorable, I suppose) applicant, but what about schools you simply didn't like as an undergrad (maybe you visited and people were rude, etc), or perhaps you have a fraternity brother sitting in front of you and you simply hate the Greek system? Clearly I'm sure that preconceived notions are supposed to be disregarded, but interviewers are still human, so do you believe that to be possible?

Also, when people hear you go to a school like Yale or MIT, they assume you are somehow privileged. (The odds on that are 2:1 if you go by percentage of students who are paying full price).

Not privileged. Mom is a secretary. Dad is dead. Went to public high school in a rural community with an average SAT score of 900-something (out of 1600) and only 33% pursue a bachelor's degree upon graduation. Most everyone else goes to help on the family farm. My mom never once asked to see a report card growing up (I'm grateful she wasn't a helicopter parent). I worked hard to get out and never to return. I was the first student ever in my high school to attend MIT and since then two others have been recruited! If you mean privileged in that I happened to be relatively smart, then yes I am lucky. If you mean privileged in that mine had the privilege of being more or less randomly selected from a giant pool of qualified college applications, then sure. If you think I am from a wealthy background or got some elite secondary education, I'm not and I didn't. I simply decided at age 14 that I wanted to get an excellent and free college education so that I would be able to escape my town forever. So I made a four year plan to do that, carried it out, and had a lot of fun along the way. And it worked.

I agree, the pros of attending a school like MIT or Yale outweigh the drawbacks by a lot. I assumed that was a given on this board. But there are negative aspects many do not realize, and Inycepoo's post reminded me of a somewhat recent experience.

Regarding your question about institutional bias in interviews (I am not an interviewer but an interviewee but I'll share my thoughts anyway, so n=2): I took the entirety of my pre-reqs (except physics) at a public university with a rather poor reputation, and I took all of my biology coursework (26 credits) at a community college. And my MIT GPA was awful, so I'm sure that did not reassure them. Even so, no one has brought it up and I was fortunate enough to land an acceptance right away. If your MCAT rocks, no one will care what school your GPA is from.
 
Last edited:
It is important to not over-think things. To my understanding. the overwhelming majority of interviewees get great reviews from their interviewers. It is only one piece of the puzzle. More people are recommended for acceptance by their interviewers than are eventually accepted. The bottleneck at this point still rests with the adcom, not the interviewers. All that said, you aren't going to get a negative review unless you do something that warrants it. If there are two perfectly normal applicants that can communicate effectively, are amicable, are professional, and can answer our questions => they are both going to be recommended for admission. One isn't going to get recommended and the other screwed over.
The interviewer do not score interviewees on a 1-100 scale where little differences between individual interviewers can make a meaningful impact (i.e. Doc A scores all average interviewees 90% and Doc B scores all average interviewees 70%). Rather it is more like 0 = not recommended, 1= recommended with reservations, 2=recommended, 3=highly recommended. You get the idea.

Exactly. Earlier this year I spoke to a former interviewer at one school, who informed me that at his institution, there is a space on the interview feedback form for brief comments on a number of different personal qualities. At the end they simply ask the interviewer whether they recommend the candidate for admission. In their case, the only quantitative rating from the interviewer is 1=recommend admission 0=don't recommend admission.

I wish a great interview guaranteed an acceptance, but at most schools it doesn't work that way. I think the interview at many schools serves more to screen out wackos and people with poor interpersonal skills. If you pass that screen, you are unfortunately still at the mercy of the admissions committee. At those schools, the interview day is a first date -- except the school in this metaphor is a guy with commitment issues. :wacky: One night stand? Sure no problem. But if you fall in love afterward, he is still not likely to commit to that four-year long-term relationship you want so bad. What a heart-breaker.

Fortunately some schools (e.g. MCW) only interview candidates with an excellent shot at acceptance in the first place.

TL;DR
In this post, I compare the medical school interview process to a homosexual relationship where your partner has baggage and is indecisive.👍
 
Lol…I think just about anybody would take that trade off. While I can identify with the slight annoyance factor, If you're privileged enough to go to a top university, I guess this is one of the minor inconveniences you have to deal with, but if ever there was a time to throw around the trite phrase "check your privilege" it is in circumstances like this (note: I'm not saying against you personally - I don't know 99% of your situation, after all - and honestly I'm not trying to start any type of war of words between Ivy Leaguers and the rest of SDN on this thread, I'm just commenting against the attitude in general).

And could we comment against the general attitude that everyone at an elite institution is automatically somehow more privileged than the rest of SDN? In the friendliest way possible, srsly.

I'm not that privileged. Sure, my parents weren't crackheads and actually realized the importance of education, but I grew up pretty close to the ghetto and still have that drawl of an inflection in my NY accent (e.g., "why you gotta go and 'tuoalk' to me like that?"). So privileged to have that going for me, but definitely not otherwise. I don't pay a single cent for all four years due to full financial aid based on need. I'm not that different than most people on these forums in terms of family background.

It's not privilege, but sheer dumb luck. That's just what I ran into in the admissions process. It's time people realize this more. This ain't the pearly white gates of the 1950s anymore, kids.

No one said that it sucks to go to an Ivy. We know it's a privilege, which is inherently different than being privileged, but I only brought it up after seeing yeahhhhboi's post, which reminded me of this slight annoyance, yes, and wanted to respond to say that we don't try to hide our school sometimes because we're douchey. That's all.
 
Also, when people hear you go to a school like Yale or MIT, they assume you are somehow privileged. (The odds on that are 2:1 if you go by percentage of students who are paying full price).

Not privileged. Mom is a secretary. Dad is dead. Went to public high school in a rural community with an average SAT score of 900-something (out of 1600) and only 33% pursue a bachelor's degree upon graduation. Most everyone else goes to help on the family farm. My mom never once asked to see a report card growing up (I'm grateful she wasn't a helicopter parent). I worked hard to get out and never to return. I was the first student ever in my high school to attend MIT and since then two others have been recruited! If you mean privileged in that I happened to be relatively smart, then yes I am lucky. If you mean privileged in that mine had the privilege of being more or less randomly selected from a giant pool of qualified college applications, then sure. If you think I am from a wealthy background or got some elite secondary education, I'm not and I didn't. I simply decided at age 14 that I wanted to get an excellent and free college education so that I would be able to escape my town forever. So I made a four year plan to do that, carried it out, and had a lot of fun along the way. And it worked.

I agree, the pros of attending a school like MIT or Yale outweigh the drawbacks by a lot. I assumed that was a given on this board. But there are negative aspects many do not realize, and Inycepoo's post reminded me of a somewhat recent experience.

Regarding your question about institutional bias in interviews (I am not an interviewer but an interviewee but I'll share my thoughts anyway, so n=2): I took the entirety of my pre-reqs (except physics) at a public university with a rather poor reputation, and I took all of my biology coursework (26 credits) at a community college. And my MIT GPA was awful, so I'm sure that did not reassure them. Even so, no one has brought it up and I was fortunate enough to land an acceptance right away. If your MCAT rocks, no one will care what school your GPA is from.

Hence why I used the disclaimer that my post was clearly not aimed at you as an individual, but at the attitude in general (and the way some people talk, I don't know if we can take anything for granted on these forums). If you take a population level look at those attending college, much less the most elite universities, they are privileged (if not just because they have the opportunity to have gotten lucky because somebody told them to fill out an application). I don't argue on an individual basis because how could I possibly know you? Honestly, being in the position to take advantage of opportunities is not something that needs to be defended, awareness is useful all. With that in mind, I didn't need your story because 1) I wasn't speaking about you as an individual (which I made clear in my post) and 2) because even if you were the most privileged person in the world there is no reason to feel the need to defend your situation - just take advantage of what you can and improve the world, your state, community, family, etc to the best of your ability. I do appreciate you sharing though, always good to get perspective about the diversity of all institutions.

And could we comment against the general attitude that everyone at an elite institution is automatically somehow more privileged than the rest of SDN? In the friendliest way possible, srsly.

I'm not that privileged. Sure, my parents weren't crackheads and actually realized the importance of education, but I grew up pretty close to the ghetto and still have that drawl of an inflection in my NY accent (e.g., "why you gotta go and 'tuoalk' to me like that?"). So privileged to have that going for me, but definitely not otherwise. I don't pay a single cent for all four years due to full financial aid based on need. I'm not that different than most people on these forums in terms of family background.

It's not privilege, but sheer dumb luck. That's just what I ran into in the admissions process. It's time people realize this more. This ain't the pearly white gates of the 1950s anymore, kids.

No one said that it sucks to go to an Ivy. We know it's a privilege, which is inherently different than being privileged, but I only brought it up after seeing yeahhhhboi's post, which reminded me of this slight annoyance, yes, and wanted to respond to say that we don't try to hide our school sometimes because we're douchey. That's all.

I think I miscommunicated my point, which was just that on this forum and in other venues, people seem not to realize how privileged they are to have the opportunity to be contemplating medical school at all, instead focusing on things like being annoyed that people assume they're smart. No comments on my end were intended for individuals, rather they were simply meant to be aimed at broad attitudes held on this forum and in other areas. I do apologize if I implied that anybody as an individual was privileged - one last time, I don't know your situation so I am not commenting directly at you or anybody else, but I do know that on average, it is safe to say those going to college, and those going to top colleges, are on average at the population level, privileged.

We can disagree on the difference between "being privileged" and on it being "a privilege," and clearly we're all guilty of oversimplifying privilege in this discussion (this is SDN after all, not sociology, so who can blame us, though I love having the chat if anybody is ever up for it 🙂 ) As you indirectly pointed out, privilege is all relative anyway.

Look at us talking social issues! And they say those going into medicine aren't interested enough in social contexts.
 
Last edited:
I know you were talking generally, which was the problem. You seem to have implied that those at elite universities are somehow more privileged than those not, which is incorrect as I pointed out. Your qualification now was exactly the point I made.

Bottom line: everyone on these forums is in some way better off than most. Even so, we can all still bitch a bit about little things here and there that annoy is and tend to crop up a lot as well.
 
Bottom line: everyone on these forums is in some way better off than most. Even so, we can all still bitch a bit about little things here and there that annoy is and tend to crop up a lot as well.

Oh so true…and yes to the rest as well, it's one of the beauties of the internet 🙂
 
Last edited:
Has an applicant ever said anything to you that made you want to insta reject them?
 
Has an applicant ever said anything to you that made you want to insta reject them?

"I'm sure you were wondering about my experiences since they're pretty random and don't really have anything to do with medicine. Let me take a few minutes to go over everything with you so that everything makes more sense."

"A few minutes" turned into 20 minutes of a 25-minute interview. Bad news for him.
 
Going to have an A in Biochem 1, should I take BioChem II? Or is it not necessary?
 
I agree with Rogue, fiancee would def have more weight behind it. It you are uncomfortable with that, just be ambiguous and call him your "significant other". Maybe it's just me, but I wouldn't probe any further ("Oh, tell me more, what do you mean by 'significant other'?")

Being close to a person of interest in your life should be a consideration on your part (obviously) and does play a role in admissions [to a degree] at my school (i.e. does the applicant have ties to the region/reason for coming here over other schools).

So go ahead and emphasize interest in as many ways as you can...if one facet of that interest ties to staying with your SO, certainly highlight it.
I have often wondered what counts as "strong ties" to a state. Surely that will vary depending on the school, with something like growing up in the state, or having parents that live there counting for almost all places. Specifically, my partner has serious interest in going to school in the state where *my* parents live, largely because he wants our kids to be near their grandparents. Can your in-laws count as a support system and therefore strong ties to a state? Does having kids with your partner make this a more buyable claim?

Stretching it even further, would any schools believe "ties" to a location because it's right between your own parents and your partner's? (as in a few hours drive from each) Or is that just completely ridiculous? Honestly it sounds ridiculous to me, even though it would definitely be our top choice, location-wise.
 
Last edited:
It is important to not over-think things. To my understanding. the overwhelming majority of interviewees get great reviews from their interviewers. It is only one piece of the puzzle. More people are recommended for acceptance by their interviewers than are eventually accepted. The bottleneck at this point still rests with the adcom, not the interviewers. All that said, you aren't going to get a negative review unless you do something that warrants it. If there are two perfectly normal applicants that can communicate effectively, are amicable, are professional, and can answer our questions => they are both going to be recommended for admission. One isn't going to get recommended and the other screwed over.
The interviewer do not score interviewees on a 1-100 scale where little differences between individual interviewers can make a meaningful impact (i.e. Doc A scores all average interviewees 90% and Doc B scores all average interviewees 70%). Rather it is more like 0 = not recommended, 1= recommended with reservations, 2=recommended, 3=highly recommended. You get the idea.

How dare you plagiarize me! 😵

I have often wondered what counts as "strong ties" to a state. Surely that will vary depending on the school, with something like growing up in the state, or having parents that live there counting for almost all places. Specifically, my partner has serious interest in going to school in the state where *my* parents live, largely because he wants our kids to be near their grandparents. Can your in-laws count as a support system and therefore strong ties to a state? Does having kids with your partner make this a more buyable claim?

Stretching it even further, would any schools believe "ties" to a location because it's right between your own parents and your partner's? (as in a few hours drive from each) Or is that just completely ridiculous? Honestly it sounds ridiculous to me, even though it would definitely be our top choice, location-wise.

Yes, those ties "count". However, don't get the wrong idea...ties aren't going to get you in. They're just a factor in answering the question "why is the applicant interested in our school" and "how likely is the applicant to attend our school if admitted".

By all means mention every tie you have, but don't expect them to work some sort of magic.

Hope that helps.
 
I can speak to the example you give. It's a different case than the one here; it's a moot point.

Very rarely do we expect someone to probe and ask if it is the prestigious institution they have in mind. If you think that's why we do it, you'll sadly misinformed and biased.

Typically we say things like that because we're so sick of the follow-up questions of "What was your GPA? SAT score? Blah blah blah blah tell my kid what it takes to get into an Ivy plz" 'cause ya know what? I don't ******* know why I got in. I don't really think I belong here, even as a junior. I don't want to tell you all my stats in high school. You don't need to know where exactly I go to school. This is especially true with Asians; I have yet to meet a fellow Asian kid/parent who did not follow up my revealing my college with those invasive questions. The more you avoid it, the more opportunistic they get. It's sickening and seriously annoying.

That's why we do it in the case you bring up. It's not the same. If you think we're elitist for thinking that those follow-up questions will be asked, it happens much more often than you'd think.

I went to MIT for undergrad, and two summers ago I took an EMT class for credit at a local CC. Because it was a summer course, 60% of the class was in high school and 30% were pre-meds. When, for all they knew, I "went to college in Boston", everything was great! Once someone noticed my college ring (which I wear as a reminder that I never have to go back to that place ever again), all hell broke loose.

Every single test I took after that: "What did you get?" Me: "I did fine." Them: "I got a 92. what did you get?" Me: "I got an A. I'm happy with that." Them: "But what was your score?" Anytime anyone did well on anything, they wanted to know if the beat the guy from MIT. It was annoying.

Secretly, I enjoyed knowing that everyone who wanted to know sooooo badly if they had scored higher never did. 😉 But it was none of their business either way. (Brief aside: Grades were posted on a bulletin board by ID number. One girl in the class actually memorized which ID was mine so she could make a comparison for each grade and judge her self-worth.)

Anyway, yes. While going to some insanely reputable school helps when applying for jobs, apartments, and professional school, it really sucks at a party.

SORRY for derailing the thread, but Inycepoo really hit the nail on the head, particularly with the bolded part.

While some students might do it to avoid annoying follow up questions and judgmental peers, lets be honest, we've all met those who are clearly doing it to show off.

Case in point, I stopped by our pre-interview social the other day after clinic. We usually start out my asking everyone to introduce themselves (hometown, undergrad, interesting hobbies, etc...) It went something like this: U Michigan, Boston, UC Davis, U Florida, Boston, Berkeley, U Chicago, Boston...

Considering that we interview tons of people from "Boston" every year and some of our class went to school in "Boston", its no secret what school you attended.
 
While some students might do it to avoid annoying follow up questions and judgmental peers, lets be honest, we've all met those who are clearly doing it to show off.

Case in point, I stopped by our pre-interview social the other day after clinic. We usually start out my asking everyone to introduce themselves (hometown, undergrad, interesting hobbies, etc...) It went something like this: U Michigan, Boston, UC Davis, U Florida, Boston, Berkeley, U Chicago, Boston...

Considering that we interview tons of people from "Boston" every year and some of our class went to school in "Boston", its no secret what school you attended.

Could always be BU or BC you know. 😀
 
Case in point, I stopped by our pre-interview social the other day after clinic. We usually start out my asking everyone to introduce themselves (hometown, undergrad, interesting hobbies, etc...) It went something like this: U Michigan, Boston, UC Davis, U Florida, Boston, Berkeley, U Chicago, Boston...

Considering that we interview tons of people from "Boston" every year and some of our class went to school in "Boston", its no secret what school you attended.
Yes, there are times when people do it to show off. However, I've noticed both in myself and many, many other peers that at some point, we stop caring whether an annoying response will follow and just stick to the vague location answer all the time, and we eventually get used to it. I blurt out my state before anything else now when asked where I go to school.

In your example, I really don't see it as them wanting to show off. If they wanted to be ostentatious, they would've said Cambridge, because it's more specific and both schools located in that town are prestigious. Similarly, a Yalie would opt for New Haven over Connecticut if he wanted to flaunt the status.

Similarly, a really cocky dude/dudette would actually just go ahead and say Harvard/MIT and have it be known explicitly that they attended school there. They'd say it multiple times (e.g., "when I was at HARVARD" as opposed to "when I was in college"). You don't really know to tell the difference until you've seen/heard one, and I've seen a lot.
 
"I'm sure you were wondering about my experiences since they're pretty random and don't really have anything to do with medicine. Let me take a few minutes to go over everything with you so that everything makes more sense."

"A few minutes" turned into 20 minutes of a 25-minute interview. Bad news for him.

Ruh roh
 
Absolutely. It was this app cycle though so I'm not going to reproduce it here in case the applicant uses SDN. He seemed like the kind who would.

what about the opposite? Like did an applicant say something that made you wish you could auto accept them? I figured the auto reject responses probably happen more than the auto accept ones 😛
 
what about the opposite? Like did an applicant say something that made you wish you could auto accept them? I figured the auto reject responses probably happen more than the auto accept ones 😛

Can't think of any one thing that someone said that made me like them. It's more of an overall thing. Most of my interviews were excellent, but a couple stand out as "I REALLY want this person to come here!"
 
Haven't the MS1s only been interviewing for the last week? :laugh:

Nothing has made me "auto-reject" or "auto-accept" someone (not that we have the power to do either - it's the committee's decision). I rate the entire interview on the whole. If someone really stands out as a fantastic applicant, they get the highest rating. My answers to the questions will help explain why I gave someone the best rating. It's usually a combination of experiences, personality, and fit for the school. Very rarely did someone get poor review (from me at least). Most of the people that show up in the admissions office are great candidates on paper. I try to get a better feel for their personality and whether or not I would want them as my classmate/future colleague.
 
I was in an auto accident which resulted in a back injury. I was given high doses of steroids (3 rounds) which made me gain large amount of weight in addition to being inactive for 6 months before surgery/recovery. I am working on getting it off, but I will still be larger than I would have been before the accident. I am curious how it will impact the interview being overweight?
 
I was in an auto accident which resulted in a back injury. I was given high doses of steroids (3 rounds) which made me gain large amount of weight in addition to being inactive for 6 months before surgery/recovery. I am working on getting it off, but I will still be larger than I would have been before the accident. I am curious how it will impact the interview being overweight?

Maybe there is some prejudice people involved in medical school admissions somewhere across the US; however, I don't think discrimination is common.

Anecdote: There are a number of overweight individuals in my class...I doubt they gained the weight only after being done with interviews.

As your interviewer, why should I care that you are merely overweight (say, in opposition to being morbidly obese)?
 
As another student interviewer, my thoughts:

- It's incredibly easy to see when someone is BSing and/or memorized their answer (just from their intonations). Seriously... at certain points of the interview I was almost embarrassed for some applicants. We want to get to know you and if you just read off a script, well…then we didn't get to know you. If I sense an applicant just gave me prepared answers every time I'll give them a lukewarm recommendation at best.

- Don't think you need to say everything that you plan to. As in, don't let "where do you see yourself in medicine" turn into a rambling about all the research you've done. Just answer the question.

- Be humble. While it's fine to talk about your accomplishments the whole point of student interviews is to see whether or not we'd like to work with you.

- Be specific about why you would want to come to our school and city. Some comments about the general size of the city and opportunity to do research (which you can do at any school) won't seem genuine. Bonus points if you took the time to explore the city/campus before the interview.
 
For this question "Why MD", what were the best answers, worst answers, funniest answers, and memorable answers? I'd like to provide examples in my answer but not sure how.
 
For this question "Why MD", what were the best answers, worst answers, funniest answers, and memorable answers? I'd like to provide examples in my answer but not sure how.

Assuming you're applying, you've been working towards becoming a doctor for at least 3-4 years. If you can't provide an answer for that question it might be a problem...
 
Assuming you're applying, you've been working towards becoming a doctor for at least 3-4 years. If you can't provide an answer for that question it might be a problem...

actually I'd like to do MD/phD. The story I would've told is theme YOLO. Medicine the is the career I want to pursue because I am fascinated by the human body. I selected MD because it allows me the opportunity to be independent or work in a large company, choose a specialty if I would like to do so. I've been reading up on medical advances since middle school (over 10 years) and I find how the entire body works together the second most fascinating thing in the world (quantum mechanics and black holes takes first place). Ultimately, there are no other position that could satisfy all three of my vision of myself in 20 years from now. I have a scientist background and am currently teaching. I rather like researching and teaching and if those two can be incorporated in my future career, all the better. It would be like living 3 lives in 1. What a great deal.

I have stories of when I worked in the ER and when I was child and visited my uncle who was a MD... but wouldn't that just be boring stories? I'd want something more humorous but appropriate and memorable.
 
actually I'd like to do MD/phD. The story I would've told is theme YOLO. Medicine the is the career I want to pursue because I am fascinated by the human body. I selected MD because it allows me the opportunity to be independent or work in a large company, choose a specialty if I would like to do so. I've been reading up on medical advances since middle school (over 10 years) and I find how the entire body works together the second most fascinating thing in the world (quantum mechanics and black holes takes first place). Ultimately, there are no other position that could satisfy all three of my vision of myself in 20 years from now. I have a scientist background and am currently teaching. I rather like researching and teaching and if those two can be incorporated in my future career, all the better. It would be like living 3 lives in 1. What a great deal.

I have stories of when I worked in the ER and when I was child and visited my uncle who was a MD... but wouldn't that just be boring stories? I'd want something more humorous but appropriate and memorable.

I think what you presented there is perfectly fine. Nothing special or extraordinary about it, but that's not a bad thing. Many many people get into medical school with a similar story. If I recall correctly, LizzyM touched on this subject matter once and she said that ADCOMs read and hear so many "why doctor" answers that nothing really stands out anymore. They've pretty much heard it all. As long as your answer is not totally bizarre and the ECs you chose match your story you will be fine.
 
I think what you presented there is perfectly fine. Nothing special or extraordinary about it, but that's not a bad thing. Many many people get into medical school with a similar story. If I recall correctly, LizzyM touched on this subject matter once and she said that ADCOMs read and hear so many "why doctor" answers that nothing really stands out anymore. They've pretty much heard it all. As long as your answer is not totally bizarre and the ECs you chose match your story you will be fine.
So I have this one issue - I tear up when I talk about something I really like... will this be a problem?
 
So I have this one issue - I tear up when I talk about something I really like... will this be a problem?

I think it's generally frowned upon because as a physician you are expected to maintain your composure under all circumstances. I think if it's a topic like talking about the death of a close one the interviewer may understand. I would try to stay composed as much as possible. Maybe LizzyM, Goro, or GynGyn can give you a better answer for this one.
 
Last edited:
Interesting thread, thanks for the input
 
Last edited:
So I have this one issue - I tear up when I talk about something I really like... will this be a problem?

A general rule of thumb: Try not to cry during a medical school interview.

Depending on your stress level at the interview day, you might be [extra] prone to becoming emotional. Do your best not to do so.
 
How have your interviewees been since you've started interviewing? Have all of them been good?
 
Yes, all have been good. That said, some better than others.

No crazies or anyone that made you go "I would not want you to have any kind of sharp object near a person ever"?
 
No crazies or anyone that made you go "I would not want you to have any kind of sharp object near a person ever"?

Fortunately, no.

Maybe that is a result of my school's criteria for selecting students to interview.
...or it might be due to my small sample size when considering the whole pool.

Perhaps it is a little of both.
 
Top