Med students have it easier...?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Some vet tech somewhere has a job because of them.

And that smoking hot vet tech may be using her salary to help support a poor medical student through school, making it possible for him to impact the world through his medical genius, potentially leading to a cure for malaria.

You know, theoretically. 😉
 
wow, i guess i hit a nerve with that one. Honestly, i'm surprised that nobody agrees with me here. it breaks my heart whenever i see a pedicured, sweatered puppy that gets more care than most people. i live in california where the economic gap is maybe more apparent, but I feel like some pet-owners really need to get perspective.
 
wow, i guess i hit a nerve with that one. Honestly, i'm surprised that nobody agrees with me here. it breaks my heart whenever i see a pedicured, sweatered puppy that gets more care than most people. i live in california where the economic gap is maybe more apparent, but I feel like some pet-owners really need to get perspective.
I live in Cali, too, and yes I see the economic gap--but, lets not get into that because you won't like what I have to say 🙂

The difference between a pedicured puppy versus another person in the US is that the person is able to take care of themselves whereas the dog is not.

Outside of the US in 3rd world countries where people actually really have it ****ty there is nothing we can do to help! Many of those countries have plenty of natural resources (e.g. much of africa and all of mexico) and their problem is sociopolitical. Its something we can't fix.

Now, lets entertain your idea. Lets give money away to all of the worlds poor people. If we completely liquidated the US we could probably afford to give every person on the planet about $5/day for a year, then what? Then the world ceases to exist as we know it because a super power liquidated itself to allow every other human on the planet to live a better life for a year. Then we'd be stuck with 6 billion people who have no more foreign aid, no more jobs, nothing. And, if you knew your history well you'd remember that around 150 years ago it was believed that we could only sustain about 2billion people on the planet and that would be our maximum life cap. Well, that was the case THEN because of differences in technology , etc. Because of the wealth of these powerful nations we have extended the lives of the entire world and allowed more people to live.

If we destroy ourselves for the benifit of everyone else the benefit will only be very temporary. We'd eventually probably lose billions of lives. And, if you believe the world could survive in its current form with America gone, you're out of your mind. All of that junk we buy that people like you compain about us buying comes from countries where people didn't use to have jobs.

Many of the worlds poor people, whom I feel very sorry for indeed, are "poor" because they have "well off" people buying things from their countries or having things made in their countries cheaper. If we didn't do this they wouldn't be "poor" they'd be much worse off. And don't come back with a "lets pay them more money" plea because if they got paid as much as an American worker would, well, you can guarantee these things would just be made in America wouldn't they? Then who would employ them?
 
wow, i guess i hit a nerve with that one. Honestly, i'm surprised that nobody agrees with me here. it breaks my heart whenever i see a pedicured, sweatered puppy that gets more care than most people. i live in california where the economic gap is maybe more apparent, but I feel like some pet-owners really need to get perspective.

I think my perspective is just fine in that I'm not heartless enough to let my animals suffer. To me, humans are just animals like all other animals, and we don't have priority over other creatures. Consequently, a cat suffering is as bad as a child starving in a third world. Those are my wacky beliefs, which I know aren't normal, but I really don't appreciate your judgmental attitude towards those of us who love animals.

Also, really, do you not spend frivolous money anywhere? Do you not have a computer? Do you not have a TV? Do you live on beans and rice? Instead of blowing any money, you send all your spare dollars elsewhere? I doubt it. Why are you picking on those of us who love our cats and dogs? My hunch is that you're more of an animal hater than a lover of the starving children everywhere. I've met your kind.

Man, my grammar and typing are atrocious today. Sorry.
 
wow, i guess i hit a nerve with that one. Honestly, i'm surprised that nobody agrees with me here. it breaks my heart whenever i see a pedicured, sweatered puppy that gets more care than most people. i live in california where the economic gap is maybe more apparent, but I feel like some pet-owners really need to get perspective.

When you commit to a pet you are committing to all of the health issues that go along with them, just as much as if you adopted a child. I recently had an issue with my cat that might have required a $3000 surgery, and I was more than prepared to pay that price even while living on my student loans because he is my responsibility and it was a condition that could be cured through surgery with no impact on his quality of life.

I'm sure if I adopted a homeless American or a poor African child I would feel the same way. Alas, this won't be happening anytime soon as I prefer my wards to be furry.
 
When you commit to a pet you are committing to all of the health issues that go along with them, just as much as if you adopted a child. I recently had an issue with my cat that might have required a $3000 surgery, and I was more than prepared to pay that price even while living on my student loans because he is my responsibility and it was a condition that could be cured through surgery with no impact on his quality of life.

I'm sure if I adopted a homeless American or a poor African child I would feel the same way. Alas, this won't be happening anytime soon as I prefer my wards to be furry.

Yeah, but they're just pets. Why should we care about their suffering? If we do, we obviously lack perspective according to our moral expert Kesse. 🙄
 
wow, i guess i hit a nerve with that one. Honestly, i'm surprised that nobody agrees with me here. it breaks my heart whenever i see a pedicured, sweatered puppy that gets more care than most people. i live in california where the economic gap is maybe more apparent, but I feel like some pet-owners really need to get perspective.

So what should we do with these cats and dogs and other domesticated animals? We bred them to be dependent on us. They can't survive well on their own. Should we just watch 'em starve because all our resources should go to feeding poor people in the third world?
 
If we destroy ourselves for the benifit of everyone else the benefit will only be very temporary.

I didn't mean to infer that you should destroy yourself by living on $5 a day or not buy things for yourselves. I said that I think it's a little extreme to spend $2000 on surgery for your rats. I just have a different perspective...I actually raised about that much for a international NGO two years ago and saw the benefits it had on people's lives. If I had extra money, I would donate it to similar programs. I'm guessing you guys would disagree with my views on animal testing and research as well. It's just that to me, people are much more important than animals. I believe in treating animals fairly and not hurting them, but I don't think they should be elevated on a pedestal higher than people.

I think we probably have had different experiences that have created different value systems. I don't expect to change your minds, I just wanted to explain myself because what I initially said was probably out of context and upset some people. 🙂 sorry!
 
I didn't mean to infer that you should destroy yourself by living on $5 a day or not buy things for yourselves. I said that I think it's a little extreme to spend $2000 on surgery for your rats. I just have a different perspective...I actually raised about that much for a international NGO two years ago and saw the benefits it had on people's lives. If I had extra money, I would donate it to similar programs. I'm guessing you guys would disagree with my views on animal testing and research as well. It's just that to me, people are much more important than animals. I believe in treating animals fairly and not hurting them, but I don't think they should be elevated on a pedestal higher than people.

I think we probably have had different experiences that have created different value systems. I don't expect to change your minds, I just wanted to explain myself because what I initially said was probably out of context and upset some people. 🙂 sorry!

Well, yeah, because your first post was judgmental and insulting and implied that those of us who care about our animals are somehow bad people who cause all sorts of suffering for other people.

I'm also kind of confused about where it's okay to spend money. So it's wrong to spend $2k on an animal surgery. Is it okay to buy a $10,000 car instead of a $5k because you know you could send that extra money to charity? Is it okay to occasionally buy new clothes instead of getting all your stuff from GoodWill because again all that money could go to feed starving children? If all this stuff is okay, why are you picking on us? Why do you get pissed off when you see someone with a dog wearing a sweater and apparently not pissed off when you see someone driving a Hummer?
 
I didn't mean to infer that you should destroy yourself by living on $5 a day or not buy things for yourselves. I said that I think it's a little extreme to spend $2000 on surgery for your rats. I just have a different perspective...I actually raised about that much for a international NGO two years ago and saw the benefits it had on people's lives. If I had extra money, I would donate it to similar programs. I'm guessing you guys would disagree with my views on animal testing and research as well. It's just that to me, people are much more important than animals. I believe in treating animals fairly and not hurting them, but I don't think they should be elevated on a pedestal higher than people.
I think we probably have had different experiences that have created different value systems. I don't expect to change your minds, I just wanted to explain myself because what I initially said was probably out of context and upset some people. 🙂 sorry!

Speaking of being elevated up on a pedestal, you and your value system be careful up there, lest you fall off and be forced to wallow around in reality with us poor schmucks. Funny thing is I mostly agree with you, but you might want to find a less condescending or insulting way of expressing your views. I'm all for Paris Hilton spending less on her Gucci bags and miniature dogs and more on AIDS awareness or whatever, but it's her money and she didn't ask me. It's that kind of liberal guilt attitude that'll have us all giving half our income to the IRS one day. Or better yet, give it all to the Christian right for African aid disbursement, see how much of it actually gets to the people who need it. I wish everybody would just move their crazy meters back toward the center and do the best they can without trying to save the world.
 
I didn't mean to infer that you should destroy yourself by living on $5 a day or not buy things for yourselves. I said that I think it's a little extreme to spend $2000 on surgery for your rats. I just have a different perspective...I actually raised about that much for a international NGO two years ago and saw the benefits it had on people's lives. If I had extra money, I would donate it to similar programs.
Oh, well, donation to "needy" is noble indeed. You can guarantee I'll take part when I've got the extra cash. But, I can see myself being a sponsor for people who are legally immigrating here to make a better life for themselves rather than a general donator.

I'm guessing you guys would disagree with my views on animal testing and research as well.
I work with dead animals all the time. Hell, I eat lunch while talking to grad students and professors who are chopping animals up. I think its something we have to do, unfortunately. Its sad and I dislike it, but just because I dislike something doesn't make it wrong--I think this is where people get all screwed up. They can't get past their emotions.

It's just that to me, people are much more important than animals.
That feeling, in a very real sense, is just a feeling that you've inhereted due to the obvious evolutionary advantages associated with humans valuing human life. Kids are functionally ******ed in a "wild" environment for many years. It we didn't value human life we would have never ended up on top of the food chain. We'd all be dead because many other, much less intelligent, animals are masters of the wild in only weeks to months and we develope very slowly and reproduce very infrequently.

I believe in treating animals fairly and not hurting them, but I don't think they should be elevated on a pedestal higher than people.
I don't think they should be elevated to a higher pedestal than people either, I just think people are very ignorant to the intelligence and the feelings of animals. Those kinds of people shouldn't have pets and those kinds of people shouldn't be telling me not to pay for my animal which will, despite dying and being in pain, crawl over to me with their last bits of energy just to be pet and spend time with me, not to spend money on a surgery for it.

Most animals are better companions than humans ever could be...many animals, especially dogs, are very selfless-- a trait humans don't usually fully come to appreciate until their almost dead. And just because they lack the morphological features necessary to speak doesn't mean that are stupid, don't care, and don't deserve treatment because I "should" send my money somewhere over seas to someone I'll never meet who may or may not be a good person. (Yes, bad people get that money too.)

I think we probably have had different experiences that have created different value systems. I don't expect to change your minds, I just wanted to explain myself because what I initially said was probably out of context and upset some people. 🙂 sorry!

Meh, let bygones be bygones I suppose. Its just that if one thing makes me mad its when people think of pets as, basically, a material posession.

I started off with a similar perspective on animals as you. But, after owning quite a few very intelligent animals (especially parrots), you get to understand them better and learn that its an absolute shame that just anybody can have a "pet". Imagine how bad your life would be if you had a large enough cerebral cortex to think, know, understand, and feel and you were denied all of the things that you naturally desire (which are uncontrollable, these are things that are evolutionarily programmed into their being that cannot be removed--e.g. raise any female mammal in isolation and artificially enseminate her and she'll still mother the same as a wild animal) because the people who "bought you" think you're a cute little decoration that's content to sit in a tiny little cage. (Some animals are content as such, and those should be available to all, but many, many animals are sold as pets that should IMHO only be sold to people with special liscenses).

Most people would kill themselves if they lived in the environment many pets do (although in the US I'd say the majority of dogs and cats are well taken care of). Unfortunatley for most other animals that are sold as pets, like rats and parrots, they can't put themselves out of their misery, but they will often resort to other things, e.g. the high occurence of parrots and self-mutilation (which never happens in the wild).

Now, I just figured I'd throw it in, I don't disagree with you that people "should" stop spending as much on ridicuous things, I think we're just arguing over what we define as "ridiculous" and I think we're pretty limited as to what we can do to help the needy of the world.
 
if only people would take the money they spend on toys, clothes and medicines for pets and send them to help children in third world countries...

Pets unduly consume a ridiculous amount of resources, it's true. Animals do not require elaborate or expensive care to be happy, all the costs above and beyond a 30 lb bag of dog food, water, a big yard and shelter at night are to make the owner feel better about how they "care" for their pet. However, my irritation of the people who drop thousands of dollars on frivolous or ostentatious animal care is assuaged by the fact that if they've got a "kitty" who they love sooooo much, chances are they're not breeding themselves, which, obviously, is a very good thing.

Well, yeah, because your first post was judgmental and insulting and implied that those of us who care about our animals are somehow bad people who cause all sorts of suffering for other people.

Again - no, you're not causing suffering, because the fact that you're all tied up with your kitty cat who you love soooooo much means that you're not producing hellish offspring of your own to spoil into a rotten little kid who'll make us all suffer in the end. It's all about justification. Get all the cats you want. Spend all your medical school loans on getting it plastic surgery, who cares. As long as it means your genes end with you, that's fine.

Plus, I hear cats taste like cardboard.



...not a "cat person".
 
Glad you had something intelligent to contribute 👍

I find it ironic that you're saying its a good thing animal lovers (in your unsubstantiated opinion) probably won't produce offspring, yet, if I've noticed one thing with people and animals, its generally the trashy folks who don't appreciate their pets and treat them like crap. They usually don't treat their kids much different either.

Family pets are a great way to teach kids about responsibility, that is, of course, if you know it yourself.
 
I find it ironic that you're saying its a good thing animal lovers (in your unsubstantiated opinion) probably won't produce offspring, yet, if I've noticed one thing with people and animals, its generally the trashy folks who don't appreciate their pets and treat them like crap. They usually don't treat their kids much different either.

This is sooooo true. If you want to see how your future spouse is going to treat you and your future children in several years, see how they treat a dog first. It's a pretty good indicator.
 
I really don't understand how quickly this conversation went from who's school is harder to spending a couple thousand to save your pet's life to dogs in sweaters and pedicures to global economy.

As for the MD vs vet school vs PA school, etc. I'm gonna go with:

1. Neither is truly hard. It just takes work and luck to get in.
2. For all those schools, you have to memorize a lot of crap. The crap is different and that's what makes the schools different.

The end.

PS. I'd spend $2000 for my dog to have surgery if needed. I guess I'm frivilous.
 
I've found med school to be a bit easier than pre-med for one simple reason:

"P = MD".

And for this reason, med school is FAR easier than a PhD program in a hard core science. There's very little to NO spoon feeding of info in the form of detailed syllibi/exam folders. Then, try taking 10 page ALL essay exams and defending your research in front of a hostile crowd!😱
 
And for this reason, med school is FAR easier than a PhD program in a hard core science. There's very little to NO spoon feeding of info in the form of detailed syllibi/exam folders. Then, try taking 10 page ALL essay exams and defending your research in front of a hostile crowd!😱

The two really cannot be compared b/c they are so different. In reality, they are both hard, but for very different reasons. It's not like medical school is a cakewalk and PhD programs are a nightmare. I'm in medical school and have friends in PhD programs, and we're all making it just fine. We all work very hard, and the day to day grind is actually a little harder in medical school. Graduate school is just more of an intellectual pursuit. That said, the smart people I know can handle intellectual pursuits, so graduate school is not some nightmare for them.
 
The two really cannot be compared b/c they are so different. In reality, they are both hard, but for very different reasons. It's not like medical school is a cakewalk and PhD programs are a nightmare. I'm in medical school and have friends in PhD programs, and we're all making it just fine. We all work very hard, and the day to day grind is actually a little harder in medical school. Graduate school is just more of an intellectual pursuit. That said, the smart people I know can handle intellectual pursuits, so graduate school is not some nightmare for them.
I'd say over 99.9999% of the people I know "make it" in graduate and professional programs, so I'm not sure what the relevance is of mentioning that. And the "nightmare versus cakewalk" analogies are just a bit extreme!😕

I thought this thread was about medical school being easier than other programs since we all know that no 2 programs, PA, DNP, MD/DO, PhD, DPT, ect are alike. Still, I haven't seen anyone sweat a PhD program like ANYTHING else out there are far as university training is concerend. Of course, post graduation is a different story.
 
I'd say over 99.9999% of the people I know "make it" in graduate and professional programs, so I'm not sure what the relevance is of mentioning that. And the "nightmare versus cakewalk" analogies are just a bit extreme!😕

I thought this thread was about medical school being easier than other programs since we all know that no 2 programs, PA, DNP, MD/DO, PhD, DPT, ect are alike. Still, I haven't seen anyone sweat a PhD program like ANYTHING else out there are far as university training is concerend. Of course, post graduation is a different story.

They don't sweat because a) they get all of their school paid for plus stipend, b) the level of detail that they need to know is not that great--the training is focused on assimilation and application only, c) there is no competition based on grades, and d) you choose your own pace.
 
I'd say over 99.9999% of the people I know "make it" in graduate and professional programs, so I'm not sure what the relevance is of mentioning that. And the "nightmare versus cakewalk" analogies are just a bit extreme!😕

I thought this thread was about medical school being easier than other programs since we all know that no 2 programs, PA, DNP, MD/DO, PhD, DPT, ect are alike. Still, I haven't seen anyone sweat a PhD program like ANYTHING else out there are far as university training is concerend. Of course, post graduation is a different story.

Hey, you're the one that said med school was FAR easier than the PhD program. So thank yourself for that one.

I don't actually understand what you're trying to say with the second part of your post. If you're trying to say that the PhD students have it a lot harder, I'd agree in some respects and disagree in others. They are very different.
 
They don't sweat because a) they get all of their school paid for plus stipend, b) the level of detail that they need to know is not that great--the training is focused on assimilation and application only, c) there is no competition based on grades, and d) you choose your own pace.
This post is VERY confusing. Are you saying that PhD programs are easier than med school for the reasons you outlined?

a) Definitely applies to most but not all grad schools.

b) Your answer here tells me that you've NEVER been to grad school.

c) This makes me think I should have qualified my answer with top graduate programs. There is definitely competition at top schools and in some classes, you're graded on a curve.

d) I can't think of ANY graduate/professional program where this is true.😕

Well no wonder some MDs don't respect PhD's.🙄
 
Hey, you're the one that said med school was FAR easier than the PhD program. So thank yourself for that one. .
Yes I did and I have no equivocation about that statement.
I don't actually understand what you're trying to say with the second part of your post. If you're trying to say that the PhD students have it a lot harder, I'd agree in some respects and disagree in others. They are very different.
Speaking in generalities since none of these programs are exactly alike. However with very few exceptions, MD/DO students graduate in 4 years. Graduate students do NOT have a set timeline for graduation and that fact alone, makes the program more difficult.
 
My friend's dog has a fake hip. That must've been expensive.
 
On that note, are stupid people more fertile?
 
Yes I did and I have no equivocation about that statement.

Speaking in generalities since none of these programs are exactly alike. However with very few exceptions, MD/DO students graduate in 4 years. Graduate students do NOT have a set timeline for graduation and that fact alone, makes the program more difficult.

Having a longer program does not make it harder. And to address some things you said to Oz: many grad students do set their own pace to a certain extent. It's a fact, so there is no use arguing about it. I've seen it done, and I've seen grad students sit around for months on end without doing much of anything trying to get data to work out or waiting on sample collections, etc. And I vaguely remember that you're accepted to an Md/PhD program. So in reality, aren't YOU the one that hasn't ever been in a PhD program? The things Oz said are true. He didn't address the things that make PhD programs hard, but the things he said that make them easy are right on the mark.
 
Ive never once heard of any dental nor vet student who says, "I'll just apply to medical school as backup if this dental or vet school thing doesn't pan out". On the contrary, its quite the opposite.
 
Having a longer program does not make it harder. .
Try telling that to someone who took from 7-10 years to finish thier PhD's. I serioulsy doubt they'd agree with you.
And to address some things you said to Oz: many grad students do set their own pace to a certain extent. It's a fact, so there is no use arguing about it. I've seen it done, and I've seen grad students sit around for months on end without doing much of anything trying to get data to work out or waiting on sample collections, etc. .
Fisrt question, why do you have so little respect for PhD students?? How can one "sit around" and yet stiil "try to get data to work out". Working on experiments is hardly sitting around.🙄 It's extremely hard to have a debate when respect isn't mutual.
So in reality, aren't YOU the one that hasn't ever been in a PhD program?.
Short answer, no but that's not the point. Not every MD/PhD program is the same and some folks start out in grad school FIRST. As for the acceptance to an MD/PhD program, that was years ago.
 
Ive never once heard of any dental nor vet student who says, "I'll just apply to medical school as backup if this dental or vet school thing doesn't pan out". On the contrary, its quite the opposite.

Then no offense, you don't know many vet students. My ugrad has a really amazing vet school and I knew tons of pre-vets. When you asked each and every one what they would do if they didn't get into vet school, the vast majority would say apply to medical school. The vet school there is way harder to get into than the medical school at the same university.
 
Then no offense, you don't know many vet students. My ugrad has a really amazing vet school and I knew tons of pre-vets. When you asked each and every one what they would do if they didn't get into vet school, the vast majority would say apply to medical school. The vet school there is way harder to get into than the medical school at the same university.
👍
The idea that vet school is easier than med school is one of the most common misconceptions out there. 🙄

This debate isn't about what program is easier. It's really about what program has the most egotistical students, so MD/DO "wins" hands down.👎
 
Try telling that to someone who took from 7-10 years to finish thier PhD's. I serioulsy doubt they'd agree with you.

Fisrt question, why do you have so little respect for PhD students?? How can one "sit around" and yet stiil "try to get data to work out". Working on experiments is hardly sitting around.🙄 It's extremely hard to have a debate when respect isn't mutual. Short answer, no but that's not the point. Not every MD/PhD program is the same and some folks start out in grad school FIRST. As for the acceptance to an MD/PhD program, that was years ago.

The length of the program does not make it more intense or hard. It makes it longer. 'Nough said.

And I am not disrespecting PhD's. Some of my best friends are getting PhD's. I think it is a wonderful thing to do. And when I say they are sitting around, I mean what they were doing was FAR less intense than what I am doing right now in medical school. How do I know this? B/c I was in the lab right there with them. It's not like I don't have some experience in this area. I know doing experiments is not trivial, but there are certainly times when grad students are on a pretty easy schedule. Other times, not so much.

I have no idea where you'll pulling all this from. I never said PhD programs were inferior, or easy for that matter. I was just responding to your claim that medical school is far easier than graduate school, b/c it isn't. They are both hard, they both have good and bad qualities about them, and I personally think they're both great paths to take. I don't see where I disrespected you, PhD programs, or anyone else. You're just trying to make medical school out to be easy compated to grad programs....neither are easy....so get over it.

I'm done here. Time for a long bike ride before studying again.
 
This debate isn't about what program is easier. It's really about what program has the most egotistical students, so MD/DO "wins" hands down.👎
I probably should have left DO's out of this since I can't of one egotistical DO.😉 👍
 
Then no offense, you don't know many vet students. My ugrad has a really amazing vet school and I knew tons of pre-vets. When you asked each and every one what they would do if they didn't get into vet school, the vast majority would say apply to medical school. The vet school there is way harder to get into than the medical school at the same university.

Wow, anecdotal evidence! That must be why the average GPA is lower for vet schools vs med schools at the same universities, and over all. I've been taught to carefully look at evidence before believing anything, and there just isn't any to support your point of view. The applicants:seats ratio is lower, the GPA is lower, etc...

"Anecdotal evidence is an informal account of evidence in the form of an anecdote, or hearsay. The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence, especially evidence-based medicine, which are types of formal accounts. Anecdotal evidence is often unscientific because it cannot be investigated using the scientific method. Misuse of anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy and is sometimes informally referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc. Compare with hasty generalization). The problem with arguing based on anecdotal evidence is that anecdotal evidence is not necessarily typical; only statistical evidence can determine how typical something is."
 
This post is VERY confusing. Are you saying that PhD programs are easier than med school for the reasons you outlined?

a) Definitely applies to most but not all grad schools.

b) Your answer here tells me that you've NEVER been to grad school.

c) This makes me think I should have qualified my answer with top graduate programs. There is definitely competition at top schools and in some classes, you're graded on a curve.

d) I can't think of ANY graduate/professional program where this is true.😕

Well no wonder some MDs don't respect PhD's.🙄

Actually I was just saying "less stressful," but now that you mention it, I'll say yeah it's easier if you are just talking about classroom exams. You probably have to be a little bit more intelligent to pass the orals and such, but as far as rote memory is concerned (i.e. study time), med school is tougher.

Yes I was enrolled in a PhD program at a division I (but not all exactly "top") school during the four years following undergrad. I have also worked in academic labs on another medical campus. Your grades do not matter in graduate school. Your grades do not matter. Your grades do not matter. There is no AOA or national board exam. Either you publish and can get grant funding or not. That's it. End of story.

There is certainly a firey competative student population, but if students are competing for top grades on their didactic classwork (which in every case represents only a small part of their training), then they are wasting their time. If they are at a "top" school, then they are already well off because they will have access to mucho research dollars, equipment, and address publications (publications granted based on the return address of the school it was mailed from).

In general, I would say that the reason my PhD program was much easier than med school was because of the nature of the students that each attracted (I believe that I also commented on this above with respect to vets and such). With my 3.5 GPA and 70th percentile GRE, I was offered PhD admissions at places like UNC and Baylor simply because of my publications and research experience (i.e. what is important to a PhD).

3.5 plus 90th percentile MCAT, however, gets me only into my state school for medicine. With that said, I'm only in the middle of the pack gradewise here. As a PhD student, I was top dog across the board in class.

By pace, I mean that it can take 3 years or 7 to do a Ph.D. You can get away with being slow if your experiments don't work. You may have a committee on your back, but I've never seen a place that requires you to finish in an exact time period.

Just about every PhD program pays your way. If they don't, then their students will almost certainly be of poor quality or low motivation.

I don't honestly think MD's in general give PhD's much thought. I've seen a lot more PhD's with an inferiority complex than MD's with a superiority complex specifically toward PhD's.
 
Oz, you just made my day. So it turns out you HAVE been in grad school....ha ha ha ha!!!!

Oz: 1
1Path: 0
 
Ive never once heard of any dental nor vet student who says, "I'll just apply to medical school as backup if this dental or vet school thing doesn't pan out". On the contrary, its quite the opposite.

Then no offense, you don't know many vet students. My ugrad has a really amazing vet school and I knew tons of pre-vets. When you asked each and every one what they would do if they didn't get into vet school, the vast majority would say apply to medical school. The vet school there is way harder to get into than the medical school at the same university.

Wow, anecdotal evidence! That must be why the average GPA is lower for vet schools vs med schools at the same universities, and over all. I've been taught to carefully look at evidence before believing anything, and there just isn't any to support your point of view. The applicants:seats ratio is lower, the GPA is lower, etc...

"Anecdotal evidence is an informal account of evidence in the form of an anecdote, or hearsay. The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence, especially evidence-based medicine, which are types of formal accounts. Anecdotal evidence is often unscientific because it cannot be investigated using the scientific method. Misuse of anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy and is sometimes informally referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc. Compare with hasty generalization). The problem with arguing based on anecdotal evidence is that anecdotal evidence is not necessarily typical; only statistical evidence can determine how typical something is."

You'll notice that I'm responding to his statement that he's never heard of any vet students saying their backup plan is medical school. Which for me, isn't true, most pre-vets I know say that med school is their back up (whether or not that's a wise thing is up for debate). So I'm just pointing out that just because his experience with pre-vets leads him to think one thing... that isn't true across the board.

Though I notice you didn't jump on his anecdotal evidence, just mine. Perhaps because he agrees with you... Hmmm....
 
Actually I was just saying "less stressful," but now that you mention it, I'll say yeah it's easier if you are just talking about classroom exams. You probably have to be a little bit more intelligent to pass the orals and such, but as far as rote memory is concerned (i.e. study time), med school is tougher..
Great debate!👍
I think there's a HUGE difference between depth and volume. Yes, the classes in med school involve a TON of volume, but I haven't found the depth nearly as close to what I experienced in grad school.
Yes I was enrolled in a PhD program at a division I (but not all exactly "top") school during the four years following undergrad. I have also worked in academic labs on another medical campus. Your grades do not matter in graduate school. Your grades do not matter. Your grades do not matter.
Please don't take offense to this, but top ranked schools don't operate this way. I've also attended a "lower ranked grad program" and it WAS a like extended undergrad.

When you say grades don't matter, what do you mean because at every school I've EVER attended, you HAVE to make a "B"of better to progress through the program. P=MD for a lot of med schools and that P range is huge! Grades may not matter as much as publishing but at top schools, they do matter form what I expereinced, espeically if you plan to apply to med school later!
There is no AOA or national board exam. Either you publish and can get grant funding or not. That's it. End of story..
Medical students obvioulsy don't have publish to graduate. OTOH, I can't count the number of grad students I've seen NOT graduate or have their program extended because they didn't publish and not just publish, but publish in a"timely" fashion.
In general, I would say that the reason my PhD program was much easier than med school was because of the nature of the students that each attracted (I believe that I also commented on this above with respect to vets and such). With my 3.5 GPA and 70th percentile GRE, I was offered PhD admissions at places like UNC and Baylor simply because of my publications and research experience (i.e. what is important to a PhD)..
Getting in is easier but getting out certainly isn't. Compare attrition rates for PhD programs to MD programs. Ever wonder why so many people drop out of PhD programs? I say it's the endless hoops you have to jump through while there which makes it HARD, but others may have different opinons.
3.5 plus 90th percentile MCAT, however, gets me only into my state school for medicine. With that said, I'm only in the middle of the pack gradewise here. As a PhD student, I was top dog across the board in class..
I'm not sure Top dog at State U really counts. "Top dog" grad students usually matriculate at "top dog" programs, from what I've seen because as you mentioned, the perks can be thousands of dollars in stipend/year, travel money, nobel prize winners for PI's, and other resources. OTOH, there are plenty fo "top dog" medical students attending state u.
By pace, I mean that it can take 3 years or 7 to do a Ph.D. You can get away with being slow if your experiments don't work. You may have a committee on your back, but I've never seen a place that requires you to finish in an exact time period..
People I know that took >5 years to finish, received some pretty crappy post docs and some not so great places, making very littel money. So I think you pay a price for whatever caused you to be in grad school for an extended period of time. Resident salaries don't seem to vary by nearly as much as Post-doc salaries. Also, 1 residency and maybe a fellowship and your golden. I know people who have had to take multiple post docs, as in 3 or more.
 
Actually I was just saying "less stressful," but now that you mention it, I'll say yeah it's easier if you are just talking about classroom exams. You probably have to be a little bit more intelligent to pass the orals and such, but as far as rote memory is concerned (i.e. study time), med school is tougher.

But the whole point is that classroom exams aren't the right metric for grad school. Yeah, sure, there's more memorization for med school. So what? Grad school is extremely competitive in terms of getting the credentials for the next step, which is usually trying to become a professor. Building a publication record seems a lot harder to me than memorizing a bunch of easy to understand crap for multiple choice and short answer tests. I don't know how you can possibly call what the PhD has to do "easier." That's just weird.

Yes I was enrolled in a PhD program at a division I (but not all exactly "top") school during the four years following undergrad. I have also worked in academic labs on another medical campus. Your grades do not matter in graduate school. Your grades do not matter. Your grades do not matter. There is no AOA or national board exam. Either you publish and can get grant funding or not. That's it. End of story.

Yes, the standard is research rather than grades on exams. So what? How does this relate to which is harder?

If they are at a "top" school, then they are already well off because they will have access to mucho research dollars, equipment, and address publications (publications granted based on the return address of the school it was mailed from).

Well, even from a top school, it's very difficutl to get a professor job if that's what you want.

In general, I would say that the reason my PhD program was much easier than med school was because of the nature of the students that each attracted (I believe that I also commented on this above with respect to vets and such). With my 3.5 GPA and 70th percentile GRE, I was offered PhD admissions at places like UNC and Baylor simply because of my publications and research experience (i.e. what is important to a PhD).

Well, yeah, the competitiveness for grad school has a different curve and drops off more quickly. But competition at top grad programs is fierce.

3.5 plus 90th percentile MCAT, however, gets me only into my state school for medicine. With that said, I'm only in the middle of the pack gradewise here. As a PhD student, I was top dog across the board in class.

Well, no offense, but a 3.5 + 90% MCAT is not exactly the height of human academic achievement. I mean, I'm not trying to insult you because there are far better measures of achievement and potential than GPA/MCAT and I don't judge people's ability based on that, but I don't know what your point is. Maybe you had a good publication record and so were statistically more above average for grad school. And since grad students don't care much about doing well in classes, because it doesn't matter, it's not surprising that the competition was less.

Your whole point reflects the view that time requiring to get high grades in classes is the appopriate measure of a program's difficulty. But classes aren't the main part of a PhD program, and memorizing isn't an important part of doing well.

By pace, I mean that it can take 3 years or 7 to do a Ph.D. You can get away with being slow if your experiments don't work. You may have a committee on your back, but I've never seen a place that requires you to finish in an exact time period.

Almost never less than 4. And the nonspecific time frame makes it easier because???
 
I work with grad students all the time in my lab. They work very hard, and often very long hours while experiments are running, but they don't work like the med school students. Its no contest. Not to mention the classes and the competitiveness--this is where the major difference comes in.

Oh, and who really cares again?
 
I have to learn to stop commenting whenever some ***** comes on here and say something like, "Med school is FAR easier than grad school...." It just leads nowhere and is a complete waste of life.
Then I imagine that half of the threads on SDN wouldn't exist!😉
 
Oh, and 1Path, I really wish you'd stop telling me how grad schools work. One of my best friends [we're talking groomsman at my wedding this summer] is in the #1 PhD program in the country [if not the world] for what he does. He received all the fancy research scholarships in undergrad, etc. etc. etc. He's funded out the a$$ in grad school, he's published, etc. etc. etc. I fully understand the whole process involved with top grad programs.
 
Oh, and 1Path, I really wish you'd stop telling me how grad schools work. One of my best friends [we're talking groomsman at my wedding this summer] is in the #1 PhD program in the country [if not the world] for what he does. He received all the fancy research scholarships in undergrad, etc. etc. etc. He's funded out the a$$ in grad school, he's published, etc. etc. etc. I fully understand the whole process involved with top grad programs.
Love the avatar 😀 Hilarious 😀
 
Love the avatar 😀 Hilarious 😀

Thanks! That's actually my dog. The costume was not my idea, though. I can thank my fiance for that one. The dog hates wearing it though...
 
Thanks! That's actually my dog. The costume was not my idea, though. I can thank my fiance for that one. The dog hates wearing it though...
I can imagine he hates it. Just think about the looks he gets from the big dogs in the neighborhood 😀
 
Top