- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 10,255
- Reaction score
- 13,584
Did you see the article out today, "HCA CEO donates salary to employees"?
People close to HCA please fact check me on this, but based on my research my opinion is it looks more like, "CEO keeps 99.2% of his $26.8 million income for himself."
According to the article he's donating his "salary." They go on to say it's only two months of his "salary." If you look up his base "salary" in HCA financials (which I found online) it appears to be $1,425,000. Divide that by 12 months, then multiply by 2 months, and you get $237,500. But keep in mind his total yearly compensation is not only his "salary" of $1.4 million, but actually $26,788,251 !!!! (HCA financial statement, here) mostly in stock awards, bonuses and increased pension benefits.
For the media to say, "CEO donates salary" leaves the impressing he's working for free and giving all his salary to his employees. Based on what I'm seeing, that's incredibly misleading. Two months of his base salary looks to me, to actually only 0.8% of his yearly income.
Which is more accurate?
A. "CEO Donates Salary to Employees!" or,
B. "CEO keeps 99.2% of his massive $26.8 million income for himself, donates tiny fraction to employees"
Aren't those incredibly misleading headlines from the news organizations printing them? In my opinion, the idea for the press attention likely went right from one of Hazen's assistants, to the press and was carefully planted as PR to calm the masses.
People close to HCA please fact check me on this, but based on my research my opinion is it looks more like, "CEO keeps 99.2% of his $26.8 million income for himself."
According to the article he's donating his "salary." They go on to say it's only two months of his "salary." If you look up his base "salary" in HCA financials (which I found online) it appears to be $1,425,000. Divide that by 12 months, then multiply by 2 months, and you get $237,500. But keep in mind his total yearly compensation is not only his "salary" of $1.4 million, but actually $26,788,251 !!!! (HCA financial statement, here) mostly in stock awards, bonuses and increased pension benefits.
For the media to say, "CEO donates salary" leaves the impressing he's working for free and giving all his salary to his employees. Based on what I'm seeing, that's incredibly misleading. Two months of his base salary looks to me, to actually only 0.8% of his yearly income.
Which is more accurate?
A. "CEO Donates Salary to Employees!" or,
B. "CEO keeps 99.2% of his massive $26.8 million income for himself, donates tiny fraction to employees"
Aren't those incredibly misleading headlines from the news organizations printing them? In my opinion, the idea for the press attention likely went right from one of Hazen's assistants, to the press and was carefully planted as PR to calm the masses.