

I think the holds are for two weeks.
MedPR needs to get a life outside of this website.

Here you go, creeps:
From his mdapps...
LOL...
Yeah we have plenty of time to "artificially fill" user in boxes.
Even if we did, it's not an available function on the VB version we're running.

Oh boy... I fell for the trap. And... 😱
🙁Oh boy... I fell for the trap. And... 😱
🙁
ThisOneDude said:lobo12 mine was for 2 weeks. It's set to expire on 1/4 around 9pm. (post 345)
But here's the latest from him:
Oh boy... I fell for the trap. And... 😱
🙁
This thread is getting weird....
Sent from my DROID RAZR using SDN Mobile
👍
I do miss MedPR's random comments.
I think he and NickNaylor are the posters I see most often, but I have a huge SDN crush on NickNaylor. 😍
Wow. You have just single-handedly denigrated your life. Good job. 😎

SDN is my life?
As long as I entertain myself, I'm good. 😎

Eh...you're not the only one.
This thread is full of fail.
Agreed Winged Scapula.. I'm not really sure where this thread is heading though... wish the discussion ended.
So... Eight pages, huh?
Its like 19 pages on the Mobile App.
Since the subject of this thread is monitoring it and posting comments on his MDApps (with the latest one directed at me), I thought I would clarify some things:
1) Post Holds are not made for isolated incidences of TOS violations;
2) to obtain a Post Hold, a user has to show an inability to stay within the confines of the TOS despite prior warnings;
3) it is the PATTERN of behavior that will get many users Banned or PH; you can't necessarily look at the last post and surmise that was the reason for the action; even minor infractions can lead to PH or Banning if there is a prior pattern of infractions;
4) the length of PH will vary;
5) the vast vast majority of SDN users are able to do so; you have to wonder what's going on when someone can't;
6) we don't discuss why someone has Administrative action against their account, so speculate away;
7) we don't artificially fill In Boxes or take PMs away; each user has a set number of allowed PMs in their In Boxes depending on status and if they are a Donor. Users put on PH automatically get a reduction in their In Box capacity; this is not done individually or to persecute someone.
I hope that helps clarify things.
I see physician and faculty in your badge area, does that mean you take part in academic medicine?
Yes.
Its like 19 pages on the Mobile App.
Since the subject of this thread is monitoring it and posting comments on his MDApps (with the latest one directed at me), I thought I would clarify some things:
I hope that helps clarify things.
Are you really cougariffic?

Sorry Winged Scapula. I didn't mean to provoke your actions. It's pretty clear as to why MedPR was on hold (even before your response), but I didn't expect the thread to run 8 pages discussing random things.
No worries.
I feel like there is a lot of misunderstanding about the Infraction system every time someone popular gets dinged with anguished cries of, "why oh why are these Mods so unfair", blah blah blah. I figured a little transparency (without revealing specific details) wouldn't hurt.
I also feel bad when I see so many naifs getting trolled.
I thought this page would work, guess not. Still, it's pretty much clear that no one is above the SDN TOS regardless of the popularity they have.I got a PM from MedPR last night. Speculate away.
I heard that he is typing up responses to each thread posted in his absence in a Microsoft Word document and he will come back and post in each thread as if he was never gone.
I thought this page would work, guess not. Still, it's pretty much clear that no one is above the SDN TOS regardless of the popularity they have.
Ah, see you are assuming that 1) people read these things and 2) think that any administrative action possibly applies to them.
I have heard all sorts of wild explanations for multiple accounts, racist comments, trolling, etc. to last me a lifetime.
👍 Also, I noticed that the TOS is in the bottom left corner, but I don't think anyone even looks at it. Compared to other forums' TOS, this one is pretty straightforward to read.
I discovered that a little while ago, the SPORKS part confused me a bit because I had no idea that people did that. I also didn't know you could single members out for doing that 😕
Not to get all inception-like, but isn't this thread a violation of the ToS? How is it open?
I don't know. Not intending to be rude here, but would it be ok if everyone just stop posting in this thread. We are doing medpr a disservice by violating his privacy and we are questioning the mod's actions. Winged Scapula took the time to post here. So I think it's better if we just let the thread die. Sorry for my harshness and I hope you understand. Thanks
because the mods have locked this thread and all, right?
Maybe not. But it's better to let the thread die. Take my advice if you want to.
👍It should have been locked a long time ago. Other threads mentioning specific users get locked very quickly; I don't really understand why this one is any different.
If MedPR really wanted his privacy, he wouldn't be leaving messages through his MDApps. 😕 It's just a silly thread, and it shouldn't be taken so seriously. 🙄
It gives me a good laugh though:thumbup:
Several other threads are accomplishing this for me at the moment. 😀
Several other threads are accomplishing this for me at the moment. 😀
If you would like to name them, I'm all ears! 👍
Are you talking about Mr. King Kong. If so, I strongly agree. St. James ftw!! 😎
"Let this thread die"
"Why isn't this thread locked?"
"Why is this thread still going?"
Everyone CHILL OUT. You guys take SDN too seriously.