Merging the Pre-allopathic and Pre-osteopathic Forums?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
How much of what is posted in the pre-allopathic forum really pertains purely to pre-allopathic students?

To be honest, a good deal of what I have seen posted in this forum doesn't even have to do with the pre-medical experience...

It's not even that the difference between DO and MD is significant. It's that the difference between the two paths of pre-medical is not even significant. For all intents and purposes, the difference between applying MD vs DO is only a little more different than applying to a Texas med school vs a Oklahoma med school. It's just a matter of paperwork, really.
 
If you want to go into plastic surgery, dermatology, or some other highly competitive field of medicine, there is a big difference between DO and MD schools. One will give you a much better chance of landing those residencies. I wouldn't say the only difference is paperwork.
 
sepereate theres no reason to merge. I personally have no interest in anything DO and would not want to read anything about it here. I think that speaks for many of the MD applicants on here. I think it would become too busy and overall just add a bunch of info that many of us would not be interested in.
 
sepereate theres no reason to merge. I personally have no interest in anything DO and would not want to read anything about it here. I think that speaks for many of the MD applicants on here. I think it would become too busy and overall just add a bunch of info that many of us would not be interested in.
Like the majority of threads already written? 😎
 
yea. didn't want to say anything, but it's kind of pointless. this whole section is under the "premedical" forums. so now it's premedical premedical allopathic 👎

So what? You guys are really anal.
 
If you want to go into plastic surgery, dermatology, or some other highly competitive field of medicine, there is a big difference between DO and MD schools. One will give you a much better chance of landing those residencies. I wouldn't say the only difference is paperwork.

Tell that to my dermatologist. He's a DO.
 
What does that mean?
it means exactly what i said. i thought it was kind of a self-evident statement

edit: to expand..

it is indeed possible to go from a 30 to a 27 with getting incorrect as little as 3 questions. it's also possible to go from a 30 to a 27 with as many as 25, or more, depending on the particular test's scale. while it certainly could happen, it's a bit disingenuous to argue that a difference between a 30 and a 27 is negligible.
 
Last edited:
good thing i confine myself to the pre-anal, i mean allo, forum.

lol bleargh you are too funny...

This thread is starting to become another MD vs DO debate. 🙄
More reason to keep them separate.
 
it means exactly what i said. i thought it was kind of a self-evident statement

edit: to expand..

it is indeed possible to go from a 30 to a 27 with getting incorrect as little as 3 questions. it's also possible to go from a 30 to a 27 with as many as 25, or more, depending on the particular test's scale. while it certainly could happen, it's a bit disingenuous to argue that a difference between a 30 and a 27 is negligible.

Uh, there's no way the difference between a 30 and a 27 could be 25+ questions unless the breakdown was something like 15/11/1 or 15/10/2. Either way, that's so rare that it doesn't even deserve a mention and you know it.
 
Uh, there's no way the difference between a 30 and a 27 could be 25+ questions unless the breakdown was something like 15/11/1 or 15/10/2. Either way, that's so rare that it doesn't even deserve a mention and you know it.

look up the conversion charts for the practice AAMC MCATs. it's in SDN somewhere. i'm speaking STRICTLY 10/10/10 going to 9/9/9. and you're right, it's rare, and it's bound to be just as rare as someone going from 30 to 27 over 3 questions, yet you don't have any qualms about mentioning the latter it seems.
 
nah, i think it's fine the way it is. merging would just make threads cycle through faster.
 
look up the conversion charts for the practice AAMC MCATs. it's in SDN somewhere. i'm speaking STRICTLY 10/10/10 going to 9/9/9. and you're right, it's rare, and it's bound to be just as rare as someone going from 30 to 27 over 3 questions, yet you don't have any qualms about mentioning the latter it seems.

I don't believe that the difference between 10/10/10 and 9/9/9 is 25 questions. That doesn't even begin to sound logical. I also think getting 9/9/9, each on the verge of 10 is a lot more common than 25 questions separating a 30 and a 27.
 
I don't believe that the difference between 10/10/10 and 9/9/9 is 25 questions. That doesn't even begin to sound logical. I also think getting 9/9/9, each on the verge of 10 is a lot more common than 25 questions separating a 30 and a 27.
it's not something for you to believe or not. it's a matter of fact derived directly from the AAMC practice MCAT conversion chart. I also don't understand how you can assert one extreme as more common than the other.
 
Way to overdramatize. The only difference is that for DO schools, math isn't counted and that you can retake classes. All other advice is virtually the same. Even stats aren't that different anymore. Average DO acceptance now is a 3.6 and a 27-28. For MD, it's 3.6 and a 30-31. It's not like it's worlds apart.

No, for MD schools the median is now 32. A 27 to a 32 is almost a standard deviation apart. And being able to retake classes and replace that D in orgo with an A- when applying to DO schools is a huge booster to DO GPAs.

Keep obfuscating all you want, but facts are clearly against you.
 
Last edited:
sepereate theres no reason to merge. I personally have no interest in anything DO and would not want to read anything about it here. I think that speaks for many of the MD applicants on here. I think it would become too busy and overall just add a bunch of info that many of us would not be interested in.

Like the majority of threads already written? 😎

No, no, Bacchus. The people making that argument are totally correct- it would just be absolutely overwhelming to read those additional threads. As we all know, it's written into the contract you sign when you become a SDN member that you are required to read every post every day. It was a struggle when I was applying to MD programs to keep up with every pre-allo thread about programs in California, Florida, and Texas that I didn't even apply to, but I did it, dammit, because that's what it means to be a part of this community and I honor my commitments. 👍
 
I vote to keep them separate. I often read both, but like knowing where the information I'll need for either pathway is located. I think if they are combined it will be more difficult to find necessary information.
 
No, no, Bacchus. The people making that argument are totally correct- it would just be absolutely overwhelming to read those additional threads. As we all know, it's written into the contract you sign when you become a SDN member that you are required to read every post every day. It was a struggle when I was applying to MD programs to keep up with every pre-allo thread about programs in California, Florida, and Texas that I didn't even apply to, but I did it, dammit, because that's what it means to be a part of this community and I honor my commitments. 👍
Don't tell anyone, but I'm not upholding the contract! 🙁
 
it's not something for you to believe or not. it's a matter of fact derived directly from the AAMC practice MCAT conversion chart. I also don't understand how you can assert one extreme as more common than the other.

I took every one of the AAMC practice tests. I never saw such a gross disparity between those scores. Please expand on this and tell us which chart precisely so that we can look up this information for ourselves.
 
No, for MD schools the median is now 32.

When did this happen? I attend an MD school and I never heard anything about the national average being 32. In fact, I think it would be next to impossible for that to be ascertained this early in the academic year if we're talking about the C/O 2013. The national average for the C/O 2012 was 30-31 and taking the upper scale for DO and lower for MD (as you did in your post), you get a 28/30.
 
No, for MD schools the median is now 32. A 27 to a 32 is almost a standard deviation apart. And being able to retake classes and replace that D in orgo with an A- when applying to DO schools is a huge booster to DO GPAs.

Keep obfuscating all you want, but facts are clearly against you.

I haven't looked at the stats, but if he said average that generally translates to mean not median. Is the median for DO a 27 too?

But yeah, I thought the mean accepted was now a 31.2 or something like that and the median like a 31.8, for MD programs.

I'm applying to both, and I don't find it particularly useful to have it separated. I originally applied to MD only.. I don't think the DO threads would have gotten in the way. I might have applied to DO if I had paid more attention to them.

But really, should there be a separate form for the schools that have averages 35 and higher on the MCAT? That's another jump up, and there quite a few of them. Probably the successful applicants there are a different group than the average MD applicant. 90% of premed overlaps (or doesn't at all, in school specific discussions), it just doesn't make much sense to have them separate from my standpoint.
 
I took every one of the AAMC practice tests. I never saw such a gross disparity between those scores. Please expand on this and tell us which chart precisely so that we can look up this information for ourselves.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=221456

i looked at a random test (6) for the sake of example:

The maximum raw score for each section to score a 10:
PS 60 VR 47 BS 58

The minimum raw score for each section to score 9s
PS 53 VR 41 BS 49

Maximum difference = 7+6+9 = 22

EDIT: a similar exercise with test 7 will yield a maximum difference of 25
 
Last edited:
You guys all realize that the "MD/DO" threads eventually merge anyway, right? There's only one clinical rotations forum, where MS3s and OMS3s post without distinction.

We also don't separate out the residency forums into MD/DO sub-forums either.

Even if you're applying only MD or only DO, how much more work is it to use tags anyway?

And for those of you making the argument that the forums should be kept separate because the "application processes are different" - does this mean that we should have a separate pre-allo TEXAS ONLY forum? TMDSAS is separate from AMCAS, and a totally separate process. And some allopathic med schools don't use AMCAS anyway (at least, they didn't when I applied - NYU, Baylor).

I vote to merge pre-allo and pre-osteo.

No, no, Bacchus. The people making that argument are totally correct- it would just be absolutely overwhelming to read those additional threads. As we all know, it's written into the contract you sign when you become a SDN member that you are required to read every post every day. It was a struggle when I was applying to MD programs to keep up with every pre-allo thread about programs in California, Florida, and Texas that I didn't even apply to, but I did it, dammit, because that's what it means to be a part of this community and I honor my commitments. 👍

:laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=221456

i looked at a random test (6) for the sake of example:

The maximum raw score for each section to score a 10:
PS 60 VR 47 BS 58

The minimum raw score for each section to score 9s
PS 53 VR 41 BS 49

Maximum difference = 7+6+9 = 22

EDIT: a similar exercise with test 7 will yield a maximum difference of 25


Let me toss this one out there for you... The CBT test has 52 questions in the sciences and 40 in verbal. You might want to post some recent numbers if you're going to argue your point.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to try to answer some of the questions that pop up in this thread. Mostly it will be my feelings and interpretations as there have been no official decisions made (and when they are made it will most likely be Lee sharing them). No, it wasn't my idea, but it should have been. It was the idea of somone attending an MD school though.

Hasn't history shown that separate is never equal?

I personally don't have a preference, but if they are kept separate, it would be nice if some threads could be accessed via both pre allo and pre osteo for discussions pertaining to both. Now the only way to do that is to make separate threads in each, which isn't allowed anyways. So maybe when someone wants to make a thread they can click pre-allo and pre-osteo and the same thread can be accessed by both forums.

In terms of 'what are my chances' threads, let's be honest, there are different standards. allo stats tend to be higher. Some osteo schools require a DO letter, no allo school does (to my knowledge anyway). So the advice people give will depend on the type of degree.

The access thing is an issue that I am not sure we can really have control over. I haven't seen any vbulletin mods that would work for that. Also I imagine it would further stress our already stressed servers.

In terms of WAMC it is feasible that the WAMC subforum would remain (I'd bet on it) and that tags could be added to it.

We already have FAQ's threads that exist in the forums. They answer most of those questions, and the ones that are School Specific can be found in the SSD subforum.

separate. i have no interest in DO and would just make the threads cycle that much quicker.. harder to catch up.

also, imagine the MD vs DO sh**storm that would descend upon this place. merge the two when they start giving out the same degrees.

MD v. DO threads aren't allowed in the first place. That isn't going to change with a merger. It will never change. Also, you may NOT have an interest but a large percentage of students apply to both schools.

Probably a Pre-DO student.:meanie:

MD student, as mentioned above.

This should be a poll, shouldn't it? I vote we keep it separate, it's more organized this way.

There really isn't a way to accurately poll the audience. Some people will miss the poll, some will make multiple accounts (and I don't think anyone on staff feels like hunting down every voter). Organization is something we are taking into consideration, but if you visit both forums you will see that there is a HUGE overlap of threads.

Until the day amcas and aacomas are merged I think these threads should stay separate. What is up with them having different applications anyway?

Both of these already have specific threads. Official AMCAS and AACOMAS threads will still exist for application specific questions.

Keep it separate, the majority of posters on the Pre-Allo and Pre-Osteo forums are there when they are right about to apply or in the process of applying. The application processes between MD and DO schools are distinct enough that it would create a lot of confusion if we merged the threads.

Again, the applications have their own specific threads. Furthermore, the secondaries have their own threads. I could argue that 90% of confusion could be eliminated if people just used the search function, but we haven't made that compulsory. We can't eliminate all confusion.

I didn't see any reasoning listed as to what sparked the consideration to merge these forums. In fact, the OP already contains a reason why these should not be merged. As far as tags go: the classified section looks too "busy." There are already long thread names in this forum. Now imagine adding a tag to many threads. It would look messy.

We will also have double the number of threads like "Class of XXX" or "USDO1 vs USDO2," etc, etc. Most of the advice given here is not applicable to DO and vice versa. Students are already confused enough about BCPM. Now add to that the DO "BCPM," which is completely different.

All you have to do is just go down the list of threads in each forum ask "Would the advice here be different for an MD path than a DO path?" Most of the advice would be different, except for those inane threads like "Can wearing braces make me more dumber?"

I hope that the forums will be kept separate. Just a few months ago Preallo was already overflowing and an entirely separate school-specific subforum had to be created to keep things organized. Now this seems to be a move in the opposite direction.

The real OP of this thread is Lee. He posted it first in PO. What sparked this is that the similarities between the two forums significantly out number the differences. From a logistical standpoint it makes more since to have them together with a larger pool of users to get advice from.

Official "Class of" threads are in the Allo forum, not PA and ALLO/OSTEO mergers are not what we are duscussing at this time. The social "Class of xxxx" thread is for PA and PO students, and anyone else really.

The labeling of threads would indicate which advice you should give so I am not sure how you are confused by that in terms of which advice to give. The answer is "the appropriate advice".

This is more organized in my opinion because all of the pre-med "stuff" is together instead of in two places.

yea. didn't want to say anything, but it's kind of pointless. this whole section is under the "premedical" forums. so now it's premedical premedical allopathic 👎

If it were pointless it wouldn't have been done.
 
LOL what a fail. my bad. haha

according to this thread http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=445309 the maximum difference on AAMC 10 will be ~16. not quite 25, but still a large range IMO

Honestly, even with the CBT test, your whole argument is riddled with irrelevancy. The fact is, there's not a whole lot of difference between a 9/9/9 and a 10/10/10. Can it mean the difference between an acceptance to one particular school vs. a rejection? Of course, but so could a difference of one or two points. The point is, a 9/9/9, while not ideal, isn't that much different than a 10/10/10 in general. Now a 27 and a 35, there's a huge difference.
 
I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up sooner.

Keeping MD vs. DO forums separate is like starting two separate forums for people with a B.A. in Biology vs. a B.S. in Biology.
 
If it were pointless it wouldn't have been done.
that's essentially arguing that it's not pointless because it was done which is why it's not pointless.

Honestly, even with the CBT test, your whole argument is riddled with irrelevancy. The fact is, there's not a whole lot of difference between a 9/9/9 and a 10/10/10. Can it mean the difference between an acceptance to one particular school vs. a rejection? Of course, but so could a difference of one or two points. The point is, a 9/9/9, while not ideal, isn't that much different than a 10/10/10 in general. Now a 27 and a 35, there's a huge difference.

the AAMC, and adcoms across the country certainly disagree
 
I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up sooner.

Keeping MD vs. DO forums separate is like starting two separate forums for people with a B.A. in Biology vs. a B.S. in Biology.

not quite.
 
that's essentially arguing that it's not pointless because it was done which is why it's not pointless.

It was done to increase search engine visibility for SDN. Some people type in pre-med, some type in allopathic, etc. By adding more key words, we move up in the ranks, thereby adding more users and a larger community to post things like "Asian Girls and White Guys" threads.
 
It was done to increase search engine visibility for SDN. Some people type in pre-med, some type in allopathic, etc. By adding more key words, we move up in the ranks, thereby adding more users and a larger community to post things like "Asian Girls and White Guys" threads.

:laugh: now that's what i'm talking about
 
Here is a suggestion:


  1. If the staff really wants to merge the forums regardless of what users think, then it just should be done. There is not purpose to having this thread.
  2. If user opinion is indeed valued, then create a poll and follow the results. This way we avoid all the subjective quarrels.

This thread seems to be on to a path of an argument and unraveling. I guess that very notion says that merging is probably not going to be a good idea. Personally, if merging does take place, I hope there will be an open mind when the need arises to create one or several subforums.

Finally, for merging to happen, you would need both pre-allo and pre-osteo students to agree. Maybe I am wrong, but so far it seems that most people favor separate forums, at least here. There is no way to tell until a poll is added.

In the end, it will all work out likely. SDN staff has been very good at cleaning up the forums and keeping everything very organized. I am sure that if merging does happen and that it turns out to not be a good idea, we will go back. Sometimes there is just no way to predict what will happen a priori.

(Having said that, there seems to be a problem with the posting function on SDN. My copy button does not work. Nor does it take an apsotrphe. Maybe it"s just me?)
 
My 2 cents: they are different and should be kept different. It will only muddy the waters of SDN to merge the two.
 
Here is a suggestion:
  1. If the staff really wants to merge the forums regardless of what users think, then it just should be done. There is not purpose to having this thread.
  2. If user opinion is indeed valued, then create a poll and follow the results. This way we avoid all the subjective quarrels.

seriously. it is very clear to me after reading the mods' posts in this thread that they already have a collective opinion about it. and that's totally fine; i am not of the "nodontmergecrapwillhitthefan" mindset. i think the merge won't matter too much, just a few more thread to keep up with which might be mildly annoying at first, but no biggie.

but mods, why start the thread if you've already decided to do it? don't bother asking us. people will just adapt if they need to.
 
I support merging them. This way everybody could get the insight of all visitors to the pre-med forums, rather than cordoning them off. Also, the two are very similar.

And traffic wouldn't become a problem either. Currently, there are only 10 threads in pre-DO that have been posted in today, versus 63 in pre-MD (not counting year specific/WAMC)... and I'm sure a good portion of the posters in pre-DO already frequent pre-MD.
 
We have not really made any official decision.

The purpose of this thread was to gather input from normal users. Many of us on staff have been here long enough and often enough that we don't see the forums in the same way normal users do.

As pointed out, the admins can do it whether 95% of you want to or not, at the end of the day it is the call of staff. Polls only tell you how many people came into a thread and clicked yes or no. There is not much to be gained in terms of what aspects we may need to consider and haven't yet. Even adding a poll would only reach Registered members who chose to see it. We have some users that log in irregularly and could miss it. There is no way to poll all of the posters. Also to whom should it be open to? Should pre-dents have a say? In an open poll they would.

Just look at the "online now" box at the bottom of the forums. In PA now there are 255 people viewing (60 members & 195 guests).
76% of people using this forum aren't logged in or registered.

Sure, they can't post input now either but a poll when only 24% of the "population" CAN vote isn't very legit.
 
Also, I will add that you have heard the opinion of about 5 staff members. We have well over 50 active staff members. You are hearing those who want to be heard. 🙂
 
And, I might add, our opinions are open for change depending on what we hear. Caesar is right - we sometimes don't see the forums the same as the "normal" users. We do try and keep an open mind, however. I know my original opinion has definitely changed based on what I've read.

So now you've heard from about 6 staff members. 😉
 
If you want to go into plastic surgery, dermatology, or some other highly competitive field of medicine, there is a big difference between DO and MD schools. One will give you a much better chance of landing those residencies. I wouldn't say the only difference is paperwork.

I wasn't talking about med school itself. I was talking about the pre-med gauntlet.

In the end, a pre-med is a pre-med. The differences between applying to an MD school vs. a DO school are negligible, at least enough so that it doesn't require two different forums.

That was my only point. It makes sense to have a separate MD and DO forum. It does not make sense to have a separate pre-med forum for each discipline, since the pre-med courses and requirements are the same (save for a small and still dwindling difference in GPA and MCAT requirements, which certainly doesn't merit the maintenance of a separate forum).
 
Top