- Joined
- Jun 12, 2002
- Messages
- 5,332
- Reaction score
- 138
Anybody have 2012 MGMA data on anesth./pain compensation ?
No they don't. It's W-2 income.These numbers have to be total compensation package and not just take home.
I'm looking at the IM subspecialist numbers and there's no way the median heme onc guy is pulling 530k and the pulm/CC guy is pulling 400k. GI at 530k is possible though.No they don't. It's W-2 income.
I'm looking at the IM subspecialist numbers and there's no way the median heme onc guy is pulling 530k and the pulm/CC guy is pulling 400k. GI at 530k is possible though.
http://www.vmghealth.com/Downloads/PhysicianCompensationSurveyData.pdf
Sorry but the heme/oncology guys do very well. I know a few pulling in $600 W-2. Gi is well over $530 for private practice. If you aren't making $650 doing Gi you are part time or suck.
Pulmonary/CC is $400k W-2.
"http://www.vmghealth.com/Downloads/PhysicianCompensationSurveyData.pdf
Sorry but the heme/oncology guys do very well. I know a few pulling in $600 W-2. Gi is well over $530 for private practice. If you aren't making $650 doing Gi you are part time or suck.
Pulmonary/CC is $400k W-2.
the docs working 35 hours make more because they are monopolists.There are some holes in the MGMA data that make it difficult to analyze. It would be helpful if MGMA also broke down compensation per hour. There are undoubtedly anesthesia group practices with docs working 35hours per week and twelve weeks vacation and practices with docs working 60 hours per week and six weeks vacation. With both practices being in the same MGMA percentile for income.
the docs working 35 hours make more because they are monopolists.
Soon we will all be working for the capitalists.
There are some holes in the MGMA data that make it difficult to analyze. It would be helpful if MGMA also broke down compensation per hour. There are undoubtedly anesthesia group practices with docs working 35hours per week and twelve weeks vacation and practices with docs working 60 hours per week and six weeks vacation. With both practices being in the same MGMA percentile for income.
It isn't capitalism vs socialism. It's capitalism with or without an unnecessary middle man between you and your billing.Didn't realize so many anesthesiologists were socialists.🙂
People love capitalism when they are owners. Hate it when they are employees. Myself included.
Didn't realize so many anesthesiologists were socialists.🙂
People love capitalism when they are owners. Hate it when they are employees. Myself included.
I am completely pro-capitalism. Just saying the nature of anesthesia business is changing. Wall Street backed outfits such as Sheridan who can put up capital will own the business. The doctors will be lowly peons working for the man. You need capital to be a capitalist.
Shhh! It's important to believe everyone else has it better! I wonder why so many pulmonologists look at cc to increase their income, while anesthesiologists avoided cc because it drops theirs.Not in California, I can guarantee you that. Most not even close actually.
What will happen when CMS decides that it will cut scope reimbursements? No, of course the whole world is aimed solely against anesthesiologists. The general public does nothing but loathe this one profession that it needs to keep it alive during surgery and laboring women and patients in pain from suffering.http://www.vmghealth.com/Downloads/PhysicianCompensationSurveyData.pdf
Sorry but the heme/oncology guys do very well. I know a few pulling in $600 W-2. Gi is well over $530 for private practice. If you aren't making $650 doing Gi you are part time or suck.
Pulmonary/CC is $400k W-2.
Shhh! It's important to believe everyone else has it better! I wonder why so many pulmonologists look at cc to increase their income, while anesthesiologists avoided cc because it drops theirs.
What will happen when CMS decides that it will cut scope reimbursements? No, of course the whole world is aimed solely against anesthesiologists. The general public does nothing but loathe this one profession that it needs to keep it alive during surgery and laboring women and patients in pain from suffering.
Stop obsessing about money, it's becoming quite nauseating to read SDN ever since I started following the Anesthesiology threads. Maybe it's because anesthesia attracts OCD-types and therefore the people are more likely to be obsessive about things like money all... the... time.
Anesthesiologists avoid CCM because of the WORK and the SICK Patients. Money is SECONDARY in the decision to avoid the ICU. Money makes the world go round and many med students choose their specialty based on income. If you are one the few idealists looking to save the world then Family practice or Infectious disease or Public Health makes a lot more sense than Anesthesiology.
The fact is that many med students choose Anesthesiology for the lifestyle and perceived high income. Unfortunately, by the time you graduate residency 80% of your fellow CA-3/CA-4 graduates won't get either.
What if you picked anesthesiology for the sick patients?Anesthesiologists avoid CCM because of the WORK and the SICK Patients. Money is SECONDARY in the decision to avoid the ICU. Money makes the world go round and many med students choose their specialty based on income. If you are one the few idealists looking to save the world then Family practice or Infectious disease or Public Health makes a lot more sense than Anesthesiology.
The fact is that many med students choose Anesthesiology for the lifestyle and perceived high income. Unfortunately, by the time you graduate residency 80% of your fellow CA-3/CA-4 graduates won't get either.
I avoid ICU because I don't want to spend all my time prolonging death, taking care of people who should have comfort measures only.What if you picked anesthesiology for the sick patients?
Sounds like your typical MICU gomer pt. Different pt demographic in the SICU. More preventing death, not infrequently due to mismanagement in the ORI avoid ICU because I don't want to spend all my time prolonging death, taking care of people who should have comfort measures only.
Serious? Sometimes **** happens. If you are critiquing your general anesthesiologist colleagues you probably need to look in the mirror and do some self reflection. The ICU trained faculty at my place leave plenty to be desired in regards to their in OR skills. I'd rather have some of our 70 year old faculty taking care of my loved one in crunch time in the OR.Sounds like your typical MICU gomer pt. Different pt demographic in the SICU. More preventing death, not infrequently due to mismanagement in the OR
Take it easy tiger...not criticizing, just making an honest statement. We all know there are some anesthesiologists better than others, I don't care if they did a fellowship or not. Was just making the point that CCM isn't all taking care of hopeless pts.Serious? Sometimes **** happens. If you are critiquing your general anesthesiologist colleagues you probably need to look in the mirror and do some self reflection. The ICU trained faculty at my place leave plenty to be desired in regards to their in OR skills. I'd rather have some of our 70 year old faculty taking care of my loved one in crunch time in the OR.
For me, the major downsides to the ICU are the social work, families, and having to trust a nurse to take care of my patient. Despite that I've always liked my ICU time.Anesthesiologists avoid CCM because of the WORK and the SICK Patients.
Most people work for money, just fyi.Stop obsessing about money, it's becoming quite nauseating to read SDN ever since I started following the Anesthesiology threads. Maybe it's because anesthesia attracts OCD-types and therefore the people are more likely to be obsessive about things like money all... the... time.
Most people work for money, just fyi.
Someone please post the starting salary of a freshly minted anesthesiologist and fellowship trained anesthesiologist in 'the golden years' compared to now. Per the forum, the sky has been falling and ground has been lost. I'd like to know how much.
Thanks.
Someone please post the starting salary of a freshly minted anesthesiologist and fellowship trained anesthesiologist in 'the golden years' compared to now. Per the forum, the sky has been falling and ground has been lost. I'd like to know how much.
Thanks.
Wow, the socal area has always been tough?My offers in 1996......no fellowship.....$108k SoCal academic..$200k SoCal pp...$500k in Vegas n Tahoe pp.
In real dollars....compensation has declined.
Wow, the socal area has always been tough?
My offers in 1996......no fellowship.....$108k SoCal academic..$200k SoCal pp...$500k in Vegas n Tahoe pp.
In real dollars....compensation has declined.
I'm so glad there are people who want to live in NYC, Chicago, DC, and LA ... just as I'm so glad there are people who want to do primary care and slog away in clinic all day! 😀So i think that is where I would start if I were a new grad, how bad do i want the extra 100-200k? bad enough to live in BFE? good then go for it, want to be near family/civilization? suck up the paycut but realize you are getting a priceless advantage. So comparing these jobs is a little like comparing apples to oranges. And just for frame of reference I would consider anything outside of NYC area, Chicago area, DC area, LA area, to be BFE. I think lots of people are in BFE but do not realize it 😉 and are under the impression they got a great deal, but in reality its just because no one wants to live there
Id blow my brains out if I lived in any of those. Already lived on NYC for a while....**** that. Earn less and pay more to live in that rat race? No thanksI think this post nails it: LOCATION is the main variable.
Most new grads are going to take call and be on board with partnership track. So your talking 250k to start in desirable areas, 150k in crazy places like MGH where they thing its a privilege to work there, and 350-450k to start in BFE (with more vacation and ridiculous benefits).
I personally would rather take 250k working my way up to 400k in a desireable area where family is happy and relatives close by, than to work in BFE and have high income and low cost of living. Sure your rich, but your in BFE.
So i think that is where I would start if I were a new grad, how bad do i want the extra 100-200k? bad enough to live in BFE? good then go for it, want to be near family/civilization? suck up the paycut but realize you are getting a priceless advantage. So comparing these jobs is a little like comparing apples to oranges. And just for frame of reference I would consider anything outside of NYC area, Chicago area, DC area, LA area, to be BFE. I think lots of people are in BFE but do not realize it 😉 and are under the impression they got a great deal, but in reality its just because no one wants to live there