- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 679
- Reaction score
- 88
Military Medicine: Fire. Aim. Ready.
TL;DR: The Pentagon is finishing tomorrow a six-month review of how to reverse course and bring dependents and retirees back to the military health system (MHS). Of course, they plan to start moving physicians and other "providers" to implement this plan no later than the next day.
Here's the List of Military Clinics That Will No Longer Serve Retirees, Families
Since 2017, the Department of Health Affairs (DHA) which now runs what used to be military "health care" under the Department of Defense (no longer "military medicine" since physicians were demoted to "providers" in the 1990s) has been implementing their carefully thought-out Slash Treatment/Undermine Physicians/Infuriate Dependents (S.T.U.P.I.D) Plan to restrict care at military treatment facilities (MTFs) to active duty only.
155,000 Military Health System Patients to Be Pushed to Civilian Care Starting This Year
Surprisingly, they got pushback from whiny, intelligent people, so they revised the plan to exclude 29 sites that were allowed to continue to see dependents and retirees to maintain the clinical skills of "providers" if they wanted to. Or not, whatever.
In Reversal, Defense Department Now Wants to Bring Tricare Beneficiaries Back to Military Health System
Then, in December 2023, the M0rons In Charge (MIC) of "military health care" gathered around a huge wooden table at the Pentagon with ancient coffee stains and eructated the following wisdom:
"Oops, this isn't working. People are getting burned out from having inadequate staff, infrastructure, and morale to do their jobs. They are also losing clinical skills from no longer providing health care to actual sick and/or pregnant people and their kids. Because of these problems, mistakes are being made by the stressed and undereducated 'clinicians' we have left that can injure or kill the few active duty troops we are still malpracticing on. Our retention rate of smart 'providers' who have finished their active duty service commitment (ADSC) is about zero.
We need to hire good doctors to help us out, but no competent civilian physician wants to work at our sad facilities for bad pay under the command of snooty nurses with shiny things on their shoulders, and, even more sadly, unlike our active duty docs, we can't force them to.
We have a great idea. Instead of chasing away dependents and retirees from our now-downsized clinics the size of cardboard refrigerator boxes, we need to increase the number of military dependents and retirees we are seeing. We should also pay civilian 'providers' more money to work at our trashy military dumps built in the 1950s, because we have been too ignorant and shortsighted to train and retain enough uniformed providers to succeed at our mission without expensive non-military medical help since around 2000.
Owing to our brains that bacteria would be ashamed of, instead of planning wisely and funding our workforce correctly over the past 30-odd years, we forced out the competent doctors and other 'clinicians' and downsized or demolished major military hospitals. We use that money for cushy fact-finding trips every February to warm places with beaches or shiny convention centers in Colorado. There, we can sip umbrella drinks or après-ski while we bemoan the decomposing state of what used to be the healthy body of military medicine. In retrospect, oops squared."
Military Health System Stabilization: Rebuilding Health Care Access is ‘Critical to the Wellbeing of our Patients’
So, for the past six months, the same idiots who came up with the S.T.U.P.I.D Plan have been racking their primitive cnidarian nerve nets to figure out how to reverse their gutting of military health care. Now they intend to make a 180 degree turn to re-attract military dependents and retirees who they had intentionally forced out to the civilian world over the past seven years. Instead of admitting that no one at any level can plan their way out of a wet paper bag because they are dumb, they call this public admission of failure "stabilization". The deadline for this "comprehensive review" is tomorrow, 30 June 2024.
Naturally, they plan to start moving people no later than the next day, 1 July 2024, to implement this 20:15 vision. DHA only requires 24 hours to analyze the information in this "review" in order to make excellent decisions regarding where to move the few remaining active duty health professionals; how to attract civilian "providers" with better pay and working conditions; and how to restore the trust of all the dismayed humans who were excreted from the Military Health System like the noisome waste products DHA treats them as. That's some AI-level brilliance right there.
I for one have deep and abiding faith that the MIC will get it right this time after three decades of soiling the bed when it comes to planning and implementing anything that promotes the provision of competent, compassionate, prompt, local, and free health care to our active duty military members, their dependents, and our honored retirees. Don't you?
PS I guess my invitation to their fancy conference on the future of military medicine got lost in the mail:
“Rebuild, Reattract, Restore”: Military Health System Leaders Convene to Forge a New Way Forward
PPS I had to write the first word of MIC that way because the system censored it when written correctly. Go figure.
PPPS I have no connection to military.com. Please feel free to DuckDuckGo other links to equivalent content and post them below. Thanks.
Final postscript: for those who don't know me and my former web site, I gave 16 suggestions to on how to fix military medicine (especially anesthesiology, since that's my specialty) back in 2006 and kept them online for almost a decade:
Rob's Opinion Editorials submitted for publication
Of course, the MIC then, as now, only listen to their inbred clique of ring-knockers that get promoted for continuing to breathe without making waves until they reach O-6 or above, at which time they undergo their customary frontal lobotomies so as not to stick out from the crowd of "leaders", so my suggestions were tossed into the circular file reserved for all good ideas.
TL;DR: The Pentagon is finishing tomorrow a six-month review of how to reverse course and bring dependents and retirees back to the military health system (MHS). Of course, they plan to start moving physicians and other "providers" to implement this plan no later than the next day.
Here's the List of Military Clinics That Will No Longer Serve Retirees, Families
Since 2017, the Department of Health Affairs (DHA) which now runs what used to be military "health care" under the Department of Defense (no longer "military medicine" since physicians were demoted to "providers" in the 1990s) has been implementing their carefully thought-out Slash Treatment/Undermine Physicians/Infuriate Dependents (S.T.U.P.I.D) Plan to restrict care at military treatment facilities (MTFs) to active duty only.
155,000 Military Health System Patients to Be Pushed to Civilian Care Starting This Year
Surprisingly, they got pushback from whiny, intelligent people, so they revised the plan to exclude 29 sites that were allowed to continue to see dependents and retirees to maintain the clinical skills of "providers" if they wanted to. Or not, whatever.
In Reversal, Defense Department Now Wants to Bring Tricare Beneficiaries Back to Military Health System
Then, in December 2023, the M0rons In Charge (MIC) of "military health care" gathered around a huge wooden table at the Pentagon with ancient coffee stains and eructated the following wisdom:
"Oops, this isn't working. People are getting burned out from having inadequate staff, infrastructure, and morale to do their jobs. They are also losing clinical skills from no longer providing health care to actual sick and/or pregnant people and their kids. Because of these problems, mistakes are being made by the stressed and undereducated 'clinicians' we have left that can injure or kill the few active duty troops we are still malpracticing on. Our retention rate of smart 'providers' who have finished their active duty service commitment (ADSC) is about zero.
We need to hire good doctors to help us out, but no competent civilian physician wants to work at our sad facilities for bad pay under the command of snooty nurses with shiny things on their shoulders, and, even more sadly, unlike our active duty docs, we can't force them to.
We have a great idea. Instead of chasing away dependents and retirees from our now-downsized clinics the size of cardboard refrigerator boxes, we need to increase the number of military dependents and retirees we are seeing. We should also pay civilian 'providers' more money to work at our trashy military dumps built in the 1950s, because we have been too ignorant and shortsighted to train and retain enough uniformed providers to succeed at our mission without expensive non-military medical help since around 2000.
Owing to our brains that bacteria would be ashamed of, instead of planning wisely and funding our workforce correctly over the past 30-odd years, we forced out the competent doctors and other 'clinicians' and downsized or demolished major military hospitals. We use that money for cushy fact-finding trips every February to warm places with beaches or shiny convention centers in Colorado. There, we can sip umbrella drinks or après-ski while we bemoan the decomposing state of what used to be the healthy body of military medicine. In retrospect, oops squared."
Military Health System Stabilization: Rebuilding Health Care Access is ‘Critical to the Wellbeing of our Patients’
So, for the past six months, the same idiots who came up with the S.T.U.P.I.D Plan have been racking their primitive cnidarian nerve nets to figure out how to reverse their gutting of military health care. Now they intend to make a 180 degree turn to re-attract military dependents and retirees who they had intentionally forced out to the civilian world over the past seven years. Instead of admitting that no one at any level can plan their way out of a wet paper bag because they are dumb, they call this public admission of failure "stabilization". The deadline for this "comprehensive review" is tomorrow, 30 June 2024.
Naturally, they plan to start moving people no later than the next day, 1 July 2024, to implement this 20:15 vision. DHA only requires 24 hours to analyze the information in this "review" in order to make excellent decisions regarding where to move the few remaining active duty health professionals; how to attract civilian "providers" with better pay and working conditions; and how to restore the trust of all the dismayed humans who were excreted from the Military Health System like the noisome waste products DHA treats them as. That's some AI-level brilliance right there.
I for one have deep and abiding faith that the MIC will get it right this time after three decades of soiling the bed when it comes to planning and implementing anything that promotes the provision of competent, compassionate, prompt, local, and free health care to our active duty military members, their dependents, and our honored retirees. Don't you?
PS I guess my invitation to their fancy conference on the future of military medicine got lost in the mail:
“Rebuild, Reattract, Restore”: Military Health System Leaders Convene to Forge a New Way Forward
PPS I had to write the first word of MIC that way because the system censored it when written correctly. Go figure.
PPPS I have no connection to military.com. Please feel free to DuckDuckGo other links to equivalent content and post them below. Thanks.
Final postscript: for those who don't know me and my former web site, I gave 16 suggestions to on how to fix military medicine (especially anesthesiology, since that's my specialty) back in 2006 and kept them online for almost a decade:
Rob's Opinion Editorials submitted for publication
Of course, the MIC then, as now, only listen to their inbred clique of ring-knockers that get promoted for continuing to breathe without making waves until they reach O-6 or above, at which time they undergo their customary frontal lobotomies so as not to stick out from the crowd of "leaders", so my suggestions were tossed into the circular file reserved for all good ideas.
Last edited: