More Patients Flocking to ERs Under Obamacare

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted128562
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted128562

When asked for comment, every American with half a brain replied, "Well duuhhhhhhhh"....

http://www.courier-journal.com/stor...-flocking-emergency-rooms-obamacare/10181349/


More Patients Flocking to ERs Under Obamacare

Laura Ungar

"It wasn't supposed to work this way, but since the Affordable Care Act took effect in January, Norton Hospital has seen its packed emergency room become even more crowded, with about 100 more patients a month."">That 12 percent spike in the number of patients — many of whom aren't actually facing true emergencies — is spurring the hospital to convert a waiting room into more exam rooms."We're seeing patients who probably should be seen at our (immediate-care centers)," said Lewis Perkins, the hospital's vice president of patient care and chief nursing officer. "And we're seeing this across the system."That's just the opposite of what many people expected under Obamacare, particularly because one of the goals of health reform was to reduce pressure on emergency rooms by expanding Medicaid and giving poor people better access to primary care.Instead, many hospitals in Kentucky and across the nation are seeing a surge of those newly insured Medicaid patients walking into emergency rooms.

Nationally, nearly half of ER doctors responding to a recent poll by the American College of Emergency Physicians said they've seen more visits since Jan. 1, and nearly nine in 10 expect those visits to rise in the next three years. Mike Rust, president of the Kentucky Hospital Association, said members statewide describe the same trend.Experts cite many reasons: A longstanding shortage of primary-care doctors leaves too few to handle all the newly insured patients. Some doctors won't accept Medicaid. And poor people often can't take time from work when most primary care offices are open, while ERs operate round-the-clock and by law must at least stabilize patients.Plus, some patients who have been uninsured for years don't have regular doctors and are accustomed to using ERs, even though it is much more expensive. Others have let illnesses and injuries fester so long they have become emergencies.

"It's a perfect storm here," said Dr. Ryan Stanton of Lexington, president of the Kentucky chapter of the ER physician group."We've given people an ATM card in a town with no ATMs."Richard Roberts, a 58-year-old Louisville resident who received expanded Medicaid through the ACA a couple of months ago, spent about 31/2 hours in Norton's ER this week, where he got a brace for a dislocated knee. The unemployed former highway worker said he was uninsured for about three years, has no regular doctor and went to the ER because it has the X-rays and scanning equipment to diagnose him.Roberts said he's also gone to the ER for pneumonia and heat stroke, and would go again if needed. But he also plans to begin looking for a primary-care doctor for regular checkups and routine care. "That's what I'm pushing for," he said.

Hospital officials said they are helping patients find primary-care physicians and hope that helps eventually lessen ER visits.But in the meantime, they said, crowding and wait times may increase for everyone, and Medicaid costs will be harder to control. A report from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said the average ER visit costs $580 more than a trip to the doctor's office."We really aren't sure what the impact is going to be," Perkins said. "But right now, it's really putting pressure on us."Medicaid up, and so is ER useFor many who research health care, the ER crunch is no surprise.Studies have shown that Medicaid patients were among the most frequent ER users before health reform, and becoming newly insured only increases ER use by giving an avenue to get treatment to patients who had been forgoing care because they couldn't afford it.A 2007 issue brief from the Kaiser Family Foundation said Medicaid patients made up 9 percent of the general population at the time but accounted for 15 percent of emergency visits. Researchers concluded that the most frequent users weren't substituting ERs for primary care, but rather suffered from chronic conditions and required more health care in general.

A January study in the journal Science found that getting covered under Oregon's 2008 expansion of a Medicaid program for uninsured adults increased ER use by 0.41 visits per person, or 40 percent relative to visits among a control group. All sorts of visits went up — those for serious problems, as well as "for conditions that may be most readily treatable in primary-care settings."Enter Obamacare, which in Kentucky added 330,615 people to the Medicaid rolls by expanding the program to cover residents earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level — $15,856 for an individual in 2013.State officials said newly signed-up recipients are reflected in the number of overall Medicaid patients seen in ERs in March, which is up 9 percent compared with the same month last year.Claims data from Passport Health Plan, a Louisville-based Medicaid managed-care organization, separates out the newly insured, and suggests they are slightly more likely to use emergency rooms than traditional Medicaid patients.Rust said the KHA doesn't yet have firm numbers on ER volumes for all hospitals this year. But he added: "They are seeing an increasing volume; that seems to be the trend statewide. ... And this is more than just the ER. There have been spikes in outpatient care and in inpatient admissions."

At University of Louisville Hospital, officials said emergency visits are up 18 percent from last year. In Lexington, Stanton said ER volumes and emergency medical services runs were up 7.5 percent for January through April compared with last year. And ER cases at Baptist Health Louisville are up 2.7 percent this January and February, compared with those months last year.Not all hospitals have rising ER volumes. For example, they've been about the same at KentuckyOne Health overall.

Bill Wagner, executive director of Family Health Centers, a Louisville-based network of clinics serving the poor, echoed many others about why people are flocking to ERs: "More than anything, this highlights the shortage of primary-care physicians."Overall, University of Kentucky figures show the state had 9,273 practicing physicians in 2012. The federal government categorizes 48 of Kentucky's 120 counties as areas with too few primary-care physicians, and lists 188 other shortage areas within counties, including several areas within Jefferson County."We still turn some patients away," Wagner said, adding that his organization is relocating and expanding Family Health Center-East Broadway to keep up with the growing need. "Overall in the community, there's still a shortage. ... The demand may get out ahead of the supply for a while."A workforce capacity study conducted for the state by Deloitte Consulting last year found that Kentucky needed 3,790 more doctors, including 183 more primary-care physicians, to meet pre-ACA demand. Under the law, it said the state may need to add an additional 284 primary-care physicians by 2017.

Complicating matters, a quarter of Kentucky's primary-care doctors could be ready to retire within five years, the report said.The report also said roughly 56 percent of the state's primary-care physicians, and 22 percent of all physicians, accepted a Medicaid payment in 2011, which Deloitte said was its best estimate for figuring out how many physicians accept Medicaid.While primary care may be difficult to find, emergency rooms cannot turn anyone away. Stanton said every patient who comes in must have a medical screening, and most doctors do more; "the vast majority ... do treatment to decrease medical and legal risk."And sometimes, experts said, primary-care providers refer patients to ERs for problems not everyone agrees are true emergencies.Kenneth Catlett, a 54-year-old Louisville man whose Medicaid coverage took effect in April, said he went to Family Health Centers last month for back and heart problems and was told to go to the ER because his problems were too serious for the clinic.Catlett went to U of L Hospital's ER, was admitted and eventually had stents placed in his heart by a Norton specialist. But he believes he should have been referred to specialists instead of the ER."All the ER did was give me the necessary tests," Catlett said. "My condition is not good, but it wasn't life-threatening at that point, and I didn't feel I should be in the ER."

Another reason the newly insured go to emergency rooms, experts say, it's what they're accustomed to doing."If people aren't used to the (health care) system, they may have problems accessing primary-care providers," said Diana Mason, who is president of the Washington, D.C.-based American Academy of Nursing and has researched the issue.Dr. Stephen Houghland, Passport's chief medical officer, said his company tries to connect new members with primary care and let them know how to use it. But addresses and phone numbers frequently change, so the staff works with advocacy groups to help spread the word.Personal factors also come into play. Mason said many people need timely care on evenings or weekends for problems such as strep throat, and don't always know where to find an urgent-care center."A lot of times, anecdotically, we hear that people don't want to wait," Houghland said. But he added: "Emergency departments are built and staffed for an emergency population. Getting people to become more aware of that takes time and education."Doctors and hospital officials said ER staff members try to let people know when it's appropriate to use the department, when they should use immediate care centers and when they should seek care at a doctor's office. They also refer patients to providers such as Family Health Centers for follow-up.Mason said another promising solution is "care coordination," in which primary-care doctors work with high-risk patients to help them control illnesses and navigate the health care system. She pointed to a study showing care coordination helped reduce ER visits by 9 percent from 2011 to the first half of 2013 among Oregonians in the pre-ACA expanded Medicaid program.Mason said letting nurse practitioners practice and prescribe on their own also may help by giving people another treatment alternative. A Kentucky law enacted this year, set to go into effect in mid-July, will allow advanced-practice nurse practitioners to prescribe non-scheduled drugs without a collaborative agreement with a physician after four years of prescribing under a collaboration.But Mason and others said such efforts may not immediately alleviate the crunch on ERs."It will continue to go up if we don't build our primary-care capacity," she said. "It will continue to go up if we don't support alternatives such as retail clinics. And it won't get better if we don't educate the public about the correct use of emergency departments."

By the numbers. 12% - The per-month increase in ER visits at Norton Hospital since the ACA went into effect. 9% - The increase of Ky. Medicaid patients seen in ERs in March, compared with last March. 3,790 - The number of doctors needed in Ky. to meet pre-ACA demand, as of last year. 284 - The projected number of new primary-care doctors needed in Ky. by 2017. Sources: Norton Hospital, Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Deloitte Consulting
 
Once again, if you give a bunch of people insurance, without increasing the number of primary care providers to see those patients, they will flock to the only place required by law to take them: the crowded Primary-Care/non-"Emergency" Department.

Maybe policy makers should read SDN EM, or four thousand other blogs/newspapers/journals that predicted this, or consult some non-politically motivated doctors next time before they try once again to reinvent the wheel with a square block of wood.
 
Well the answer is "more PCPs", not "Obamacare is dumb and should be eliminated."

Oh don't worry, the article addresses that. By giving NPs independent practice privileges.

BUT - if you think more PCPs will fix this problem, you're crazy. It looks like you're a premed so I don't expect you to understand, but people abuse the ED for convenience like you wouldn't believe. And when they are given "insurance" with little to no copay, it becomes all that much easier to abuse the system.
 
I understand that people abuse the ED. Got to see plenty of that when volunteering and doing research there. But the reality is that there isn't really any other option besides making it easier/quicker to access a PCP or urgent care center and educate people. Increasing ED copays won't do much besides punish people if they can't actually find a PCP to go to.
 
That's all fine and good but let's back up and examine two simple facts:

1) The proponents of Obamacare said giving people insurance would decrease ED visits

2) They were wrong, which came as no surprise to most of us

Argue anything else you like, but you cannot get around the fact that the "benefits" of Obamacare were misrepresented to the American people.
 
That's all fine and good but let's back up and examine two simple facts:

1) The proponents of Obamacare said giving people insurance would decrease ED visits

2) They were wrong, which came as no surprise to most of us

Argue anything else you like, but you cannot get around the fact that the "benefits" of Obamacare were misrepresented to the American people.

1) It probably will. Eventually. No one said all of this stuff will get better overnight.

1a) "The proponents of Obamacare" is a nebulous and vague term. Who specifically are you referring to? Talking heads on TV? Obama himself? Members of Congress?
 
They referenced getting these ED patients to more appropriate places like PCPs and urgent cares. I can tell you that most (almost all) urgent cares don't accept Medicaid. If you show up with Medicaid at most urgent cares you're considered self-pay and pay an up front fee to be seen.
 
Increasing ED copays won't do much besides punish people if they can't actually find a PCP to go to.

I disagree. I'm not aware of any state that has a higher ED copay than they do for a PCP visit for Medicaid patients, if they charge one at all. Why make an appointment for a week or two later with a PCP who will actually accept the Medicaid pittance, in a best case scenario, when you can go to the ED now for the same price or less and have every diagnostic modality immediately available to you? And now that we're in an era of billboards that post the current ED wait time and guaranteed door-to-doctor times of an hour or less, you might not even spend as much time waiting in the ED than in your PCP's waiting room.

Your family doctor probably won't accommodate your request for a sandwich and Sierra Mist, either.

If you don't create incentives for people to do what you want them to do, they'll do what they perceive as best for them. That's just human nature, and it's absurd to expect anything else. If you tack on the fact that those who are raised in poverty are conditioned to be poor long-term planners, it's beyond belief that the people who were given the responsibility to try to change the system didn't see this coming.
 
I disagree. I'm not aware of any state that has a higher ED copay than they do for a PCP visit for Medicaid patients, if they charge one at all. Why make an appointment for a week or two later with a PCP who will actually accept the Medicaid pittance, in a best case scenario, when you can go to the ED now for the same price or less and have every diagnostic modality immediately available to you? And now that we're in an era of billboards that post the current ED wait time and guaranteed door-to-doctor times of an hour or less, you might not even spend as much time waiting in the ED than in your PCP's waiting room.

Your family doctor probably won't accommodate your request for a sandwich and Sierra Mist, either.

If you don't create incentives for people to do what you want them to do, they'll do what they perceive as best for them. That's just human nature, and it's absurd to expect anything else. If you tack on the fact that those who are raised in poverty are conditioned to be poor long-term planners, it's beyond belief that the people who were given the responsibility to try to change the system didn't see this coming.

Exactly.

If you have a stomach ache, why would you sign up for a PCP, fill out all the paperwork, schedule an appointment, wait 3-4 days (best case scenario), attend the initial appointment, wait for labs and testing, then attend a follow-up appointment a few days later to get the results, when you can have everything done at your local ED right now at 3am?

Until people aren't allowed to use the ED for primary care, they always will as long as its the faster and more convenient option.

In addition, as long as hospitals can make money off of people using the ED as primary care, they'll continue to post billboards encouraging everyone to abuse the ED for all their primary care needs.
 
1) It probably will. Eventually. No one said all of this stuff will get better overnight.

1a) "The proponents of Obamacare" is a nebulous and vague term. Who specifically are you referring to? Talking heads on TV? Obama himself? Members of Congress?

1) No. They said "We have to pass the bill to find out what is in the bill". Now we are finding out what is in the bill, and the effects of what is in the bill....and the sycophants are saying "It will get better!!". No, it won't.

1a) Yes, yes, and yes.
 
Obamacare is crap.

Everyone knows there are major problems with our healthcare system. Obamacare - instead of addressing these, just added more patients to the party.

If your current system is unsustainable and collapsing, how do you fix it by adding more patients????

Typical political move. Patch up a little bit and leave a huge mess for the next guy (both parties do this).
 
"Giving more coverage has resulted in more ED visits for non-urgent medical needs"



And this surprises absolutely NO ONE...
 
"In a time when everybody feels entitled, Why can't I feel entitled too? Somebody took away my god given right, I guess God must have gave it to you, Yeah, I guess God must have slipped it to you."

- Jack White, Entitlement
 
Last edited:
"In a time when everybody feels entitled, Why can't I feel entitled too? Somebody took away my god given right, I guess God must have gave it to you, Yeah, I guess God must have slipped it to you."

- Jack White, Entitlement

Yeah, there's a distinct "entitlement" attitude these days.... but more and more - I'm finding that there's also a real need for medical care as well. People are sicker and more comorbid in general "these days" (I type that in quotes because I haven't been on the planet.... or in medicine... for that long when compared to others) but I don't remember YOUNG people being SO sick SO commonly when I was a young-er man.

Outstandingly obese diabetics in their twenties with foot amputations.... early thirtysomethings with CABG scars.... its crazy.
 
Top