MS4 Dismissed - Please Help

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
That last paragraph scenario by aProgDirector would make total sense as to why both OP and his friend were dismissed. There is a high chance his friend had the bad track record and felt this was the last nail in the coffin. In the end, an appeal would not work in OPs favor. It would mean his friend would have to be let back into the program also, due to favoritism of OP for the same situation.
 
Goro is exactly right. Everyone always says "it was my first time," and everyone is always full of it.

Everybody lies. I find this story implausible, at best.
Even if it wasn't the OP's first time cheating, you can't treat every first time offense (first time they're caught, anyway) as if there's a documented record of cheating just because you assume it's a patterned behavior. If you're caught for the first time, it's a first time offense unless you can prove otherwise. If you deviate from that and start punishing based on assumed previous behavior, you end up with a ridiculous no-tolerance (for anything) society that delivers maximum punishment for sincere one-time only mistakes. Considering we all mess up something at some point, I wouldn't want to live in that kind of society. Better to give the opportunity to learn from a mistake a move on, but fool me twice and it's over.

Edit: whether the school should have a no tolerance policy for cheating is a different story. My point is that it doesn't do well to assume guilt beyond what you have evidence for.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate the "innocent until proven guilty" thinking, but med schools do everything in their power to see students to graduation, especially the further along they are in the process. At my school, a first time cheating offence would lead to:

A trip to the Student Professionalism Committee
A note about the incident in the Dean Letter
A probable year long suspension
A remediation in some type of self-designed ethics course

So to reiterate, to dismiss an MS4 for cheating on an online quiz is a punishment that vastly exceeds the crime (think about this: it's the academic version of the death penalty), and as such, there has to be something else going on. It might be possible that OP was failing multiple clerkships, and this was the breaking point.


Even if it wasn't the OP's first time cheating, you can't treat every first time offense (first time they're caught, anyway) as if there's a documented record of cheating just because you assume it's a patterned behavior. If you're caught for the first time, it's a first time offense unless you can prove otherwise. If you deviate from that and start punishing based on assumed previous behavior, you end up with a ridiculous no-tolerance (for anything) society that delivers maximum punishment for sincere one-time only mistakes. Considering we all mess up something at some point, I wouldn't want to live in that kind of society. Better to give the opportunity to learn from a mistake a move on, but fool me twice and it's over.

Edit: whether the school should have a no tolerance policy for cheating is a different story. My point is that it doesn't do well to assume guilt beyond what you have evidence for.
 
I just graduated medical school and this whole situation is weird. Was the online test being proctored or was it taken at home? I feel that as 3rd and 4th year students our schools sometimes give us "busy work" in the form of irrelevant online quizzes and tests that we are allowed to take at home. I feel like if you were caught sharing answers with a classmate on something you were allowed to be taking at home with no supervision than the test was obviously not that important in the minds of the school or you would have been required to take it at school or in a proctored environment. Now if you were caught cheating on a proctored online exam (that is how we took our shelf exams) that is a different story. Best of luck with everything!
 
It's the grey area between third and fourth year between different med schools' schedules. Based on the info provided OP most likely done messed-up 3rd year.

Aaaannnd just to join the bandwagon, based on my experience this is probably just the tip of the iceberg for OP's story. I have classmates who were busted for what was essentially cheating on a test in pre-clinical years that got off with a slap on the wrist.

Since OP is lacking in details, what's the story?
 
Even if it wasn't the OP's first time cheating, you can't treat every first time offense (first time they're caught, anyway) as if there's a documented record of cheating just because you assume it's a patterned behavior. If you're caught for the first time, it's a first time offense unless you can prove otherwise. If you deviate from that and start punishing based on assumed previous behavior, you end up with a ridiculous no-tolerance (for anything) society that delivers maximum punishment for sincere one-time only mistakes. Considering we all mess up something at some point, I wouldn't want to live in that kind of society. Better to give the opportunity to learn from a mistake a move on, but fool me twice and it's over.

Edit: whether the school should have a no tolerance policy for cheating is a different story. My point is that it doesn't do well to assume guilt beyond what you have evidence for.

Yes it is a ridiculous notion. Disturbs me that so many faculty members on this board support it.
 
I have to reiterate gyngyn's from above:

It is very uncommon for a 4th year student to be dismissed (no matter how egregious their offense(s)).
I can only offer that dismissals after this many years in school is more likely to be predicated upon a pattern of misdeeds, not a single offense.


The only reason my school has dismissed people in the clinical years was due to repeated Board failures. Even multiple clerkship failures hasn't triggered the boot.

There's a lot of this attitude in this thread, and I think the problem people have with it is that it gives a ridiculous amount of deference to academic administration based on literally no information.

What you talk about may be your experience but at the same time:

A) We know almost nothing about the poster or his school. We don't know where he goes to school or how they handle things. We have no idea whether students are on the promotions committee/honor court/whatever organization deals with these issues.

B) We have no idea whether people in power might have something against OP for reasons irrelevant to his offense. I've seen instances where certain professors have been bitter towards certain students because they were on the admissions committee and didn't want them in the school but were overruled. Mostly I've seen this with students who had "connections." It's rare but it happens. We just don't know anything about his situation.

C) It's possible that the school has been having a string of suspected cheating events unrelated to OP and is trying to make an example of him.

I just think we don't know anything about this situation. It seems weird that you're giving deference to the administration when you don't even know who these people are.
 
There's a lot of this attitude in this thread, and I think the problem people have with it is that it gives a ridiculous amount of deference to academic administration based on literally no information.

What you talk about may be your experience but at the same time:

A) We know almost nothing about the poster or his school. We don't know where he goes to school or how they handle things. We have no idea whether students are on the promotions committee/honor court/whatever organization deals with these issues.

B) We have no idea whether people in power might have something against OP for reasons irrelevant to his offense. I've seen instances where certain professors have been bitter towards certain students because they were on the admissions committee and didn't want them in the school but were overruled. Mostly I've seen this with students who had "connections." It's rare but it happens. We just don't know anything about his situation.

C) It's possible that the school has been having a string of suspected cheating events unrelated to OP and is trying to make an example of him.

I just think we don't know anything about this situation. It seems weird that you're giving deference to the administration when you don't even know who these people are.

I think this stems from a deeper problem. There seems to be something about physicians/students that makes us adverse to supporting each other, in fact we almost get off on hating on each other (how many times have you heard that XYZ specialty is full of idiots).

Probably why we lack any sense of political unity too.
 
I think this stems from a deeper problem. There seems to be something about physicians/students that makes us adverse to supporting each other, in fact we almost get off on hating on each other (how many times have you heard that XYZ specialty is full of idiots).

Probably why we lack any sense of political unity too.
I don't think so. Most of us care about our profession and don't want people with a history of lying, cheating, stealing, and disrespect as a part of it. If you have any experience with dismissals you should know that they're not taken lightly at US MD/DO schools. There's no benefit to the school when dismissing a student -- each one of us is a big investment for the school. I feel bad for the OP if they were indeed dismissed for a small thing, but that would indicate that reinstatement could be argued due to a single slip of discretion.

Sent from my SM-G900T using SDN mobile
 
I don't think so. Most of us care about our profession and don't want people with a history of lying, cheating, stealing, and disrespect as a part of it. If you have any experience with dismissals you should know that they're not taken lightly at US MD/DO schools. There's no benefit to the school when dismissing a student -- each one of us is a big investment for the school. I feel bad for the OP if they were indeed dismissed for a small thing, but that would indicate that reinstatement could be argued due to a single slip of discretion.

Sent from my SM-G900T using SDN mobile

So you don't think that the attitude of assumption of widespread guilt from a single infraction indicates our tendency to not look out for one another? I personally think it is one good example of many.
 
We're trying to make the argument from experience. The notion that a faculty member would be out to "get" a student who was admitted over their objection is laughable at best and paranoid at worst. The liability issue for the school alone staggers the imagination.

So you don't think that the attitude of assumption of widespread guilt from a single infraction indicates our tendency to not look out for one another? I personally think it is one good example of many.
 
We're trying to make the argument from experience. The notion that a faculty member would be out to "get" a student who was admitted over their objection is laughable at best and paranoid at worst. The liability issue for the school alone staggers the imagination.

Assuming guilt from nothing but "experience" is wrong. It's wrong when the LA pd do it with african americans and it's wrong when school administrators do it with students.

I'm not saying we are out to get one another, but that we do not look out for one another. It's part of why this career has been heading in the toilet.
 
Medical school is not a court of law and the rules of evidence aren't quite the same.

Do a search in SDN on "dismissed from medical school" and you'll see why I say this.


Assuming guilt from nothing but "experience" is wrong. It's wrong when the LA pd do it with african americans and it's wrong when school administrators do it with students.

I'm not saying we are out to get one another, but that we do not look out for one another. It's part of why this career has been heading in the toilet.
 
Assuming guilt from nothing but "experience" is wrong. It's wrong when the LA pd do it with african americans and it's wrong when school administrators do it with students.

I'm not saying we are out to get one another, but that we do not look out for one another. It's part of why this career has been heading in the toilet.
Or maybe its because the cases we hear about here are outliers. In my years in medical school, no one got kicked out for conduct at my school. A few on grades, but that's a different area. I bet there are countless people here who could tell the same story - 4 years and no one kicked out for conduct. It just isn't that common.

As people have said, med schools try their best to NOT lose students. Looks bad on them.

As for assumptions - 99% of the people who come here with stories of woe end up leaving out lots of important details that, when finally revealed, make it quite clear why they're in trouble.
 
Even if it wasn't the OP's first time cheating, you can't treat every first time offense (first time they're caught, anyway) as if there's a documented record of cheating just because you assume it's a patterned behavior. If you're caught for the first time, it's a first time offense unless you can prove otherwise. If you deviate from that and start punishing based on assumed previous behavior, you end up with a ridiculous no-tolerance (for anything) society that delivers maximum punishment for sincere one-time only mistakes. Considering we all mess up something at some point, I wouldn't want to live in that kind of society. Better to give the opportunity to learn from a mistake a move on, but fool me twice and it's over.

Edit: whether the school should have a no tolerance policy for cheating is a different story. My point is that it doesn't do well to assume guilt beyond what you have evidence for.

The world is not puppies and kittens. How many times have you been lied to a patient? Based on the information provided here, the only logical conclusion is that there is some kind of established track record of bad behavior. I'm a firm believer that cheating warrants dismissal. However most schools see that in a softer light, so again...something else is going on.
There's a lot of this attitude in this thread, and I think the problem people have with it is that it gives a ridiculous amount of deference to academic administration based on literally no information.

What you talk about may be your experience but at the same time:

A) We know almost nothing about the poster or his school. We don't know where he goes to school or how they handle things. We have no idea whether students are on the promotions committee/honor court/whatever organization deals with these issues.

B) We have no idea whether people in power might have something against OP for reasons irrelevant to his offense. I've seen instances where certain professors have been bitter towards certain students because they were on the admissions committee and didn't want them in the school but were overruled. Mostly I've seen this with students who had "connections." It's rare but it happens. We just don't know anything about his situation.

C) It's possible that the school has been having a string of suspected cheating events unrelated to OP and is trying to make an example of him.

I just think we don't know anything about this situation. It seems weird that you're giving deference to the administration when you don't even know who these people are.
Probably because he cheated?

I mean...I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but by OP's own admission...he's guilty. There's not a grey area to cheating. It's blatantly wrong. It's concerning to me that there are this many future medical professionals that have significant trouble grasping that concept.
 
The world is not puppies and kittens. How many times have you been lied to a patient? Based on the information provided here, the only logical conclusion is that there is some kind of established track record of bad behavior. I'm a firm believer that cheating warrants dismissal. However most schools see that in a softer light, so again...something else is going on.

Probably because he cheated?

I mean...I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but by OP's own admission...he's guilty. There's not a grey area to cheating. It's blatantly wrong. It's concerning to me that there are this many future medical professionals that have significant trouble grasping that concept.

Dude, I get it. He cheated and that's wrong. The question here is whether the punishment is fitting the crime. Of course cheating on an online quiz shouldn't be condoned, but is it something that warrants kicking someone out of medical school with hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt and ruining the career they've been working for almost a decade towards?

I don't get it, man. People are so emotional about this **** that they can't seem to understand how draconian this punishment is. You're saying that we should be ruining somebody's life because they tried to save time or grub a few points on an online quiz by cheating. Do you also advocate 10 years in prison and occupational blacklisting for people who run stop signs because "it probably represents a pattern of disregard for traffic laws and endangerment of pedestrians?"
 
Last edited:
Agree 100% that this was a draconian punishment. No argument there.

IF this is a first time offence, I surmise that there are schools out there that have honor codes as stringent as the service academies:"A cadet will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those that do".


Dude, I get it. He cheated and that's wrong. The question here is whether the punishment is fitting the crime. Of course cheating on an online quiz shouldn't be condoned, but is it something that warrants kicking someone out of medical school with thousands of dollars of debt and ruining the career they've been working for almost a decade towards?

I don't get it, man. People are so emotional about this **** that they can't seem to understand how draconian this punishment is. You're saying that we should be ruining somebody's life because they tried to save time or grub a few points on an online quiz by cheating. Do you also advocate 10 years in prison and occupational blacklisting for people who run stop signs because "it probably represents a pattern of disregard for traffic laws and endangerment of pedestrians?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: GUH
Agree 100% that this was a draconian punishment. No argument there.

IF this is a first time offence, I surmise that there are schools out there that have honor codes as stringent as the service academies:"A cadet will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those that do".
As far as we know, it IS a first time offense. My first post was in response to people justifying the extreme punishment for cheating on a quiz by assuming there was previous cheating, even though OP stated that his/her record was otherwise clean. You don't get to assume guilt beyond what there is evidence for.
 
1. Getting caught cheating online is academic darwin-award material. I'm trying to think of how this happens and nothing is even coming to me unless its through a proctored testing service.

2. The odds of a lawsuit are slim and none. If its a private organization, forget it - all they have to do is show a reason other than a protected reason for severing ties with you. Go to people's office and break down and cry - literally turn on the waterworks - for months before getting an attorney.
 
Last edited:
We are doing this based upon years of teaching experience at medical schools, and being a member of SDN for years, and having read tons of ""I was dismissed from medical school. Now what?" posts.

And, if you become a mom, you'll quickly learn that there are always two sides to every story.


You don't get to assume guilt beyond what there is evidence for.
 
We are doing this based upon years of teaching experience at medical schools, and being a member of SDN for years, and having read tons of ""I was dismissed from medical school. Now what?" posts.

And, if you become a mom, you'll quickly learn that there are always two sides to every story.

You know, I can't think of a single time when someone posted about something here and the real story didn't come out. Maybe it's recall bias though
 
We are doing this based upon years of teaching experience at medical schools, and being a member of SDN for years, and having read tons of ""I was dismissed from medical school. Now what?" posts.

And, if you become a mom, you'll quickly learn that there are always two sides to every story.
If you want to assume guilt on SDN then okay, because you can't act on your assumptions here. But to advocate that medical schools should punish students based on assumed guilt which they have no evidence for is ridiculous. It's one thing to doubt the OP's story (which you have done) but it's something else entirely to assume the OP's story is true and justify expulsion over cheating on a quiz because ''cheating is a patterned behavior'' (which another poster did, and that's who I responded to).
 
I never once said that. I have agreed that the med school's action is overkill for such an offense. You are also making the assumption that the school is acting without proof.

As I have posted numerous times, no medical school has ever been successfully sued when it was shown that its actions were not arbitrary or capricious.



If you want to assume guilt on SDN then okay, because you can't act on your assumptions here. But to advocate that medical schools should punish students based on assumed guilt which they have no evidence for is ridiculous. It's one thing to doubt the OP's story (which you have done) but it's something else entirely to assume the OP's story is true and justify expulsion over cheating on a quiz because ''cheating is a patterned behavior'' (which another poster did, and that's who I responded to).
 
I never once said that. I have agreed that the med school's action is overkill for such an offense. You are also making the assumption that the school is acting without proof.

As I have posted numerous times, no medical school has ever been successfully sued when it was shown that its actions were not arbitrary or capricious.

You frequently and proudly flaunt your "tip of the iceberg" bs which is nothing but acting without proof.
 
And that makes baseless assumptions right why exactly?

Most of the time I'm all about the bleeding heart "let's give them another chance" deal, but I have literally never read one of these "I was dismissed for sneezing" threads without at some point having it turn into "I was dismissed for breaking and entering, substance abuse and a pattern of disrespectful behavior, oh and I sneezed at the second hearing during my defense and I think that's why they dismissed me."

That's an exageration (barely) of what these usually turn into. Each one ends up with a pattern of crappy behavior, horrible insight, and a justifiable desire to not share embarrassing personal information.

It's cynical, but it's justified.
 
You frequently and proudly flaunt your "tip of the iceberg" bs which is nothing but acting without proof.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you... but there is usually a long, documented trail (or deep, dark iceberg, if you prefer) of misdeeds that come up in dismissal cases. I've seen some cases where there are pages of independent notes and evaluations from standardized patients, professors, staff, preceptors, DMEs, and even community members that have been involved in dismissals... people do some ridiculous things and get away with it. The school always has ample, documented evidence of multiple infractions with actions they took to help the student. "One strike" dismissals are saved for pretty egregious offenses. Of course, I can only speak to my school, and I only hope other schools are so thorough and understanding.
 
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you... but there is usually a long, documented trail (or deep, dark iceberg, if you prefer) of misdeeds that come up in dismissal cases. I've seen some cases where there are pages of independent notes and evaluations from standardized patients, professors, staff, preceptors, DMEs, and even community members that have been involved in dismissals... people do some ridiculous things and get away with it. The school always has ample, documented evidence of multiple infractions with actions they took to help the student. "One strike" dismissals are saved for pretty egregious offenses. Of course, I can only speak to my school, and I only hope other schools are so thorough and understanding.

Yes you are misunderstanding me. I am referring the attitude where you assume that due to one infraction there must be more. If it is a proven pattern then yes action should be taken.
 
Or maybe its because the cases we hear about here are outliers. In my years in medical school, no one got kicked out for conduct at my school. A few on grades, but that's a different area. I bet there are countless people here who could tell the same story - 4 years and no one kicked out for conduct. It just isn't that common.

As people have said, med schools try their best to NOT lose students. Looks bad on them.

As for assumptions - 99% of the people who come here with stories of woe end up leaving out lots of important details that, when finally revealed, make it quite clear why they're in trouble.

I think that depends on both the school and how aware of the rest of the class students are. I know the class under me has had 3 or 4 students dismissed due to integrity issues, and there are a bunch of people in my class that didn't and I'm sure still don't have a clue.
 
You frequently and proudly flaunt your "tip of the iceberg" bs which is nothing but acting without proof.

We don't have all the info the op's school had, so all we can do is make an educated guess. Based on past experience on here and with @Goro at his school, that's why we assume what we do. But that's been explained to you before...
 
We don't have all the info the op's school had, so all we can do is make an educated guess. Based on past experience on here and with @Goro at his school, that's why we assume what we do. But that's been explained to you before...

You can explain to me until you are blue in the face, I still won't support assuming guilt whether on a forum or in real life.
 
You can explain to me until you are blue in the face, I still won't support assuming guilt whether on a forum or in real life.

Ok... You do it your way...

035ostrich_468x538.jpg
 
20 people in my medical school were going to be forced to repeat a year and 2 were to be kicked out entirely during our 2nd year after they got caught cheating on a stupid quiz that was worth 2% of our final grade. To give some background, we had small groups for microbiology where we took quizzes at the beginning. We were shown slides on a projector, given multiple choice answers, and we bubbled in our answers on our scantron. We used the exact same scantron for each quiz, meaning that on day 1 of micro quiz, we bubbled in the answers for questions 1-4, day 2 was 5-8, day 3 was 9-12, and so on. These scantrons were supposedly not graded until the end of the course, so you could potentially change your answers that you got wrong on the previous quiz then next time you took it. Well, apparently admin got wind of a facebook group started by 2 people that gave the answers for each days quiz so that people could correct their answers the next time they took the quiz. They started secretly grading these scantrons after they were turned in and caught the people that were changing their answers. In total, 20 were caught and 2 people were held responsible for helping everyone cheat. These students all lawyered up. Apparently the 2 that were to be kicked out had to remediate the year and had the event placed on their dean's letter. As for the 20, they were given a 0% on the quiz and had the event placed on their dean's letter. I only found out about the dean's letter part after interviewing during 4th year when one the program director's I interviewed with asked me why there were several people from my school that were caught cheating on an exam.
 
I never once said that. I have agreed that the med school's action is overkill for such an offense. You are also making the assumption that the school is acting without proof.

As I have posted numerous times, no medical school has ever been successfully sued when it was shown that its actions were not arbitrary or capricious.
You're misunderstanding me. My first post here was a direct reply to another poster (who I quoted) who was stating that if the school did expel someone over this, it was justified because cheating is always a patterned behavior. My stance has always been that you can't punish based on assumed guilt that you lack evidence for.

You replied to my first post assuming it was encompassing your stance as well, but I could care less what anyone believes actually happened on SDN because we're not in charge of administering punishment. My only disagreement here is with someone who says that medical schools are justified in punishing based on assuming patterned behavior, even if they don't have proof.

I hope that clears that up 🙂
 
But #realtalk most of SDN (faculty and pre-meds, anyway) would be fine with chopping off someone's right hand for suspected cheating on a non-graded homework assignment. We'll always be in the minority here lol.

Probably better to go one finger at a time since cheaters "tend to be repeat offenders" and if you went one hand at a time, you'd run out of hands to cutoff pretty quickly...

But in all seriousness, any opinion offered here is no more than speculation. I'd say the only advice that is worth anything, at least on this thread, comes from @Goro and the other admin that commented a few pages back.
 
We're animals. We draw conclusions based on the culmination of all of our past experiences, because thats what animals do. There are exceptions to the rule, but those are few and far between. There are dozens of these stories online, and having sat on a conduct review committee, I've seen half a dozen of them in person. This is not the full story. It's phenomenally hard to be dismissed from an academic institution, and I have seen Deans consistently over rule the committee's decision to remove a student. OP is not telling the complete story.

IF he is, then it's a fantastic lesson to all of the knuckleheads on here (premed, med, or otherwise) that the risks of cheating far outweigh the rewards.
 
Yup, we're in agreement here. All is well!
You're misunderstanding me. My first post here was a direct reply to another poster (who I quoted) who was stating that if the school did expel someone over this, it was justified because cheating is always a patterned behavior. My stance has always been that you can't punish based on assumed guilt that you lack evidence for.

I hope that clears that up 🙂


Agreed. Unfortunately, there's decent data that dishonest doctors start out as dishonest students, so that's why we take professionalism so seriously. Now, the story Zebra relayed above is an interesting one. 18/20 students received a severe sanction but weren't dismissed. I would surmise that the ringleaders were the ones who got the boot.

But what really surprised me was the backstory. Allowing the students access to the same scantrons? Was this school so poor they couldn't use fresh scantrons each assessment???

I'm reminded that there's a legal term called the "attractive nuisance" which is something like if you have a pool, it's your responsibility to keep kids out of it with a fence. Because otherwise, kids being kids, they're going to want to go into the pool, even if they know they're not supposed to. So the faculty at Zebra's school bear a good deal of responsibility for setting up the temptation for cheating.



But #realtalk most of SDN (faculty and pre-meds, anyway) would be fine with chopping off someone's right hand for suspected cheating on a non-graded homework assignment.
 
Last edited:
Yup, we're in agreement here. All is well!



Agreed. Unfortunately, there's decent data that dishonest doctors start out as dishonest students, so that's why we take professionalism so seriously. Now, the story Zebra relayed above is an interesting one. 18/20 students received a severe sanction but weren't dismissed. I would surmise that the ringleaders were the ones who got the boot.

But what really surprised me was the backstory. Allowing the students access to the same scantrons? Was this school so poor they couldn't use fresh scantrons each assessment???

I'm reminded that there's a legal term called the "attractive nuisance" which is something like if you have a pool, it's your responsibility to keep kids out of it with a fence. Because otherwise, kids being kids, they're going to want to go into the pool, even if they know they're not supposed to. So the faculty at Zebra's school bear a good deal of responsibility for setting up the temptation for cheating.



But #realtalk most of SDN (faculty and pre-meds, anyway) would be fine with chopping off someone's right hand for suspected cheating on a non-graded homework assignment.
But not all dishonest students (and there's a spectrum here, which is important) become dishonest doctors. Assuming otherwise is a slippery slope.
 
But not all dishonest students (and there's a spectrum here, which is important) become dishonest doctors. Assuming otherwise is a slippery slope.
Last time I'll weigh in here, I'm not entirely sure how any of these nitpicky comments help the OP. Let's all remember that this is an advice thread, not a thread to discuss the morality of students and faculty or what we perceive as inherent flaws in the way students are adjudicated following transgressions...
 
We're animals. We draw conclusions based on the culmination of all of our past experiences, because thats what animals do. There are exceptions to the rule, but those are few and far between. There are dozens of these stories online, and having sat on a conduct review committee, I've seen half a dozen of them in person. This is not the full story. It's phenomenally hard to be dismissed from an academic institution, and I have seen Deans consistently over rule the committee's decision to remove a student. OP is not telling the complete story.

IF he is, then it's a fantastic lesson to all of the knuckleheads on here (premed, med, or otherwise) that the risks of cheating far outweigh the rewards.

So since I'm an "animal" and draw conclusions from "past experiences" can I go ahead and say that all Jewish people are cheap? Or all black people are crooks? How about Muslims being terrorists?

On a serious note you should probably try and avoid bias more in your decision making.
 
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you... but there is usually a long, documented trail (or deep, dark iceberg, if you prefer) of misdeeds that come up in dismissal cases. I've seen some cases where there are pages of independent notes and evaluations from standardized patients, professors, staff, preceptors, DMEs, and even community members that have been involved in dismissals... people do some ridiculous things and get away with it. The school always has ample, documented evidence of multiple infractions with actions they took to help the student. "One strike" dismissals are saved for pretty egregious offenses. Of course, I can only speak to my school, and I only hope other schools are so thorough and understanding.
maybe because i went to a pretty big med school, but this was not my experience at all. I was a middle of the road, average student and I doubt any of the faculty at my school could pick me out of a lineup, let alone come up with pages and pages of documented misdeeds if I was caught cheating on an exam for the first time as an MS4.
 
maybe because i went to a pretty big med school, but this was not my experience at all. I was a middle of the road, average student and I doubt any of the faculty at my school could pick me out of a lineup, let alone come up with pages and pages of documented misdeeds if I was caught cheating on an exam for the first time as an MS4.
That's because you were a middle of the road, average student. Our dean likes to say he hopes to only see us twice -- convocation and graduation. The vast majority of students will not have any issues and, likely, will hardly be known to faculty. My point is that the kind of students who get dismissed are often throwing off red flags from the beginning of their time in medical school and make themselves known in a bad way.
 
Top