neuro_phd said:
everyone is entitled to have their own paranoid ideas however STUPID they may be
So let me get this straight . . . you come to this forum, soliciting advice. And, after it is given, insult it.
RRRRRRRRight . . .
Oh, I guess I didn't write what you want to read. OK, please allow me to re-phrase.
neuro_phD, your idea is an absolutely wonderful one. I mean, getting a PhD in neuroscience AFTER getting one in neurophysiology is so earth-shatteringly profound, that I can barely contain myself. Of course you absolutely NEED the PhD to do "clinical neuroscience" as you so brilliantly put it. But please don't tell that to practicing academic neurologists and neurosurgeons, (whispers) they think they can do research, even basic research
without a PhD.
But you and I know better right?
I know you must be independently wealthy, meaning that you could easily pay the ~$50,000 it requires to attend and live near a private medical school. But you want the AMERICAN taxpayers to pick up the tab for your education because it's such a tremendous investment. I mean,
, come on, it's not like you would (oh, I don't know) finish a PhD and decide to do something else?
Good luck!