- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
Out of curiosity, are there any other rebellious students out there doing graduate work in something "non-traditional" for mstps? I am doing my work in chemistry, which i guess is a little unusual. 🙂
I am doing my degrees separately, but my PhD is in organic chem, so I'll be a nontraditional MD/PhD when I finish, I suppose. 👍 What are you doing for your research?Out of curiosity, are there any other rebellious students out there doing graduate work in something "non-traditional" for mstps? I am doing my work in chemistry, which i guess is a little unusual. 🙂
I'm not sure yet, but I'd like to do something that uses my chem background. Maybe pain or addiction.I think that it is interesting to see that people are doing their PhDs in non-traditional fields.
What clinical specialties and what areas of research do you see yourself doing in the future?
I'm working on developing targeted MRI contrast agents
Most people will have no idea what you're talking about on your poster. T1 or T2 relaxation? What's that?😉
Don't most med students also take a radiology class? We talked about T1 and T2 in radiology and neuroscience.I hear ya on that...if I start talking about relaxations, I just get blank stares. You would think grad students would know something about T1 and T2, though...most of them have used NMR at some point.
For QofQuimica: Most mstp programs (as far as I know) have retreats for their students/faculty where there are poster presentations and talks by students. There's also a national MD/PhD conference in Colorado, I think.
I just want to say, for the record, that even *I* know what T1 and T2 are. And I'm only an M1. 😉 I mixed them up once when the anatomy prof was pimping a few of us during lab, but on the bright side, now I'll never forget which is which.Don't most med students also take a radiology class? We talked about T1 and T2 in radiology and neuroscience.
Don't most med students also take a radiology class? We talked about T1 and T2 in radiology and neuroscience.
I haven't officially been accepted into the program yet, but if all goes well (and it looks like it will) mine will be in philosophy (esp. bioethics)
Yes it is, if it's not biochem/biophysics. Chill.To the OP, give me a break. Chemistry is not a non-traditional field.
As you can see from the replies here there is a not a lot of love from the traditional MD/PhD's, but believe me there are funds.
I'm not sure why you think this - I respect non-traditional paths and careers because they can offer fresh perspective.
However, the mission of Medical Scientist Training Programs is to train physician-scientists. That doesn't mean that a PhD in philosophy or bioethics could not be beneficial, but it doesn't fit the scope of these training programs.
I actually do very similar work, except the contrast agent is already developed (it's a naturally occuring element) and I'm working on delivery, kinetics, and measurement in vivo in large animals. I'm a biophysics grad student, though I could probably easily be a bioengineering graduate student and do the same work. After doing my rotations in several things including my old interests in Neurology and IM, I decided on Radiology, which makes this type of work so much easier to do as a grad student.
The heck with the MSTP retreats. 95% of my program does cell and molecular biology work. You can call it Neuroscience or Immunology all you want, it all looks the same to me. With a few exceptions, it's the same techniques. Who wants to be just like everyone else? That being said I actually take it as something of an insult to be put in the "imaging" catagory at the retreat, though I am nowadays the only guy there with a poster. I work on devices, some of which have nothing to do with the imaging, I do biochemical assays, I get histology sometimes... What, should we call the CAMB guys "Blotters" (with subspecializations in western, northern, and southern)? Or maybe we should call the guys who have alot of fluoroscopy "imagers" also? Oh well, nobody can call you much of an idiot really. Most people will have no idea what you're talking about on your poster. T1 or T2 relaxation? What's that?😉
It depends on the school. Some universities that are essentially specialized medical campuses do not have chemistry departments. Some universities organize any chemistry related to biology into a "chemical biology" program, but it's still really chemistry. Sometimes parts of biochemistry are really "biological chemistry" or "chemical biology". That's semantics.
That said, I do not think its very strange for someone to do chemistry for their PhD. Many people do organic synthesis and testing of small molecules for their PhD in combination with a MD.
What you're describing (biochemistry or biological chemistry or chemical biology) is not organic synthesis. Even someone having a biochemical project that involves running a few simple reactions is not really doing similar work to a hardcore organic synthesis PhD. Actually, the only MD/PhD organic chemists I've met or heard of are people like me who did their degrees separately. There are three other organic chem PhDs-to-MDs that I have come across in the past three years on SDN, plus one DDS-to-PhD in organic. And now possibly peanut. 😉It depends on the school. Some universities that are essentially specialized medical campuses do not have chemistry departments. Some universities organize any chemistry related to biology into a "chemical biology" program, but it's still really chemistry. Sometimes parts of biochemistry are really "biological chemistry" or "chemical biology". That's semantics.
That said, I do not think its very strange for someone to do chemistry for their PhD. Many people do organic synthesis and testing of small molecules for their PhD in combination with a MD.
i'm doing my phd in organic synthesis, too! 😀 where are you now, QofQuimica? and peanut?What you're describing (biochemistry or biological chemistry or chemical biology) is not organic synthesis. Even someone having a biochemical project that involves running a few simple reactions is not really doing similar work to a hardcore organic synthesis PhD. Actually, the only MD/PhD organic chemists I've met or heard of are people like me who did their degrees separately. There are three other organic chem PhDs-to-MDs that I have come across in the past three years on SDN, plus one DDS-to-PhD in organic. And now possibly peanut. 😉
I'm in an MD program; I did my PhD separately. You're sitting on quite a nice pile of awesome interviews and acceptances there. Any thoughts about where you want to end up?i'm doing my phd in organic synthesis, too! 😀 where are you now, QofQuimica? and peanut?
You could do clinical chemistry (subspecialty of path). I've thought about that myself. 🙂I didn't think that Chemistry was a non-traditional area to go into for an MD/PhD until I started the application process. Many programs think you're kinda weird for wanting to do it, especially if your not wanting to become a biochemist. I have an environmental chem back ground, I think I want to go into the more analytical side of things (diagnostics-ish area maybe). I have an extensive research background, but I wonder if I didn't get interviews at some schools because of my reserach interests.... guess I'll never know. Anyone else have a similar thing happen?