- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 7
Does any one have any idea when this report will be available to schools this cycle? I know it's sometime in February.
tomorrow.
You bet.Is this even useful to schools this early?
You bet.
If most of our candidates are holding nowhere better, we had better slow our jets on acceptances.Can you elaborate? Is this used primarily to determine the size of the WL? Like if historically people accepted to X medical school choose to withdraw from Y medical school.
At this point only schools that have accepted you will see where you are holding an acceptance.AAMC says that schools that haven't taken an action on you/have rejected you won't see this, but will WL schools see where you are currently holding?
If most of our candidates are holding nowhere better, we had better slow our jets on acceptances.
If they are all holding at top 5's, there is more room for acceptances.
It's a calibration tool.
Sometimes.Does holding multiple acceptances also play into scholarship consideration?
Shot-in-the-dark guess here: but most likely.do schools wait until the report comes out to make decisions on recent interviews?
I think what he means is: because schools know the multiple acceptance status of their accepted students, they might accept more people in order to account for those students who got into high tier schools. His question is whether this will "accepting more people" will extend to "interviewing more people"Schools can't see the report unless they already accepted you (or waitlisted later on). So until they've made a decision on your application, they wouldn't see the report, and therefore couldn't factor your other acceptances into the decision.
I think what he means is: because schools know the multiple acceptance status of their accepted students, they might accept more people in order to account for those students who got into high tier schools. His question is whether this will "accepting more people" will extend to "interviewing more people"
Oops, now that I've read over it again, you guys sound more correct. The misunderstanding was probably because I was curious whether they will invite more people for interview based on the report. lolI'm not sure; I interpreted it as if he had already been interviewed, and wants to know whether the committee is waiting to see how others faired in multiple acceptances to determine whether he would be waitlisted/accepted/rejected. I didn't interpret it as him asking if more interviews would be extended.
Oops, now that I've read over it again, you guys sound more correct. The misunderstanding was probably because I was curious whether they will invite more people for interview based on the report. lol