- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
I appreciate your thoughts. I suppose the question is "do people really feel that the surveys are actually anonymous"?
it may already be that wayI Or better still, warn applicants to the severity of the situation. Let the program match 80% fmgs for a year and see how that goes for the pd and chair.
.
I have no pity for people unwilling to stand up for their education. If it's that bad, transfer. But complaining on here won't lead to real change. Or better still, warn applicants to the severity of the situation. Let the program match 80% fmgs for a year and see how that goes for the pd and chair.
Medicine is not meant to be self taught. The system exists as it does for good reason, as both book knowledge and skills are necessary.
Well, that's not helpful. If you're stuck in a malignant program, it's easy to feel like there are no choices. From reading SDN, you get the impression that most people's careers are essentially over if they get fired, and that an angry PD could fire you (by not renewing your contract) pretty easily. IMO, worrying about retaliation is pretty valid, and I can understand the op and his fellow residents for not reporting this stuff.
It's not always possible to involve the gme office without fear of retaliation from my program director/chair. This issue is not germaine to my program alone. I am simply trying to make a bad situation better. I want to understand how to learn in this environment. I also want to hear from more experienced residents who have had to create their own curriculum to learn.
You and your fellow residents needs to contact the ACGME together - [email protected]
As a coordinator I can tell you that ACGME resident surveys really are anonymous and you need to be honest on them.
I call bull**** on this.
Sure the ACGME may try to preserve confidentiality on their end, but the programs aren't stupid. A program can tell which residents are dissatisfied and through that make the inference as to who blew the whistle.
If the ACGME wanted to gain credibility, they would interview not current residents but recently graduated residents from a particular program. It's hard for residents to be unabashedly honest about a program's shortcomings when that program has those residents' professional futures by their throats.
How do I learn?
1. open book
2. read book
3. close book
repeat PRN
As snide as this comes off, I think it's the right idea. OP, you gain nothing fighting with a PD who isn't interested in change. You can't fight City Hall. You probably get yourself on your PDs $$&@ list without accomplishing anything. But there's no reason you can't find ways to learn in spite of him. There are plenty of lectures and podcasts on a multitude of subjects in every specialty out there you can watch, often by the big name people in the field. Check out your subspecialty organizations/journals. There are very good books written in every specialty. While medicine shouldn't ideally be self taught, passing boards certainly can be accomplished this way. If others in your residency are of like mind, there's no reason you guys can't divide up topics and find a time to give each other some version of didactics, or a journal club of good teaching board relevant articles. While I agree with dragonfly that resident lectures are a poor excuse for attending run didactics, beggars can't be choosers.
I otherwise agree with the notion that residency is really just a few short years you put in to get to a goal, and you are often best advised to keep your head down and plow through, with as little antagonizing the higher ups as possible. But there's really no reason you can't accomplish learning outside of the confines of the program if so inclined. Nothing is stopping you from outside reading, podcasts, study groups and other self learning. And honestly a lot of folks who have good didactics don't get as much out of them as you might think. A great lecture given after a hard night of call is often a wasted hour that could have been better spent sleeping. I'd say even with good didactics most of what residents learn comes from other avenues.
Keep in mind that if the ACGME finds reason to make a program unaccredited, then you would not be board eligible; certainly you want things fixed, but you don't want to screw yourself over by getting the program in so much trouble it affects your ability to find a job or be boarded in your specialty. A program can only have so many things to fix and still remain accredited. Certainly a lone resident does not want to be the "person held responsible" for a negative review. Be honest in answering RRC/ACGME questions, but don't intentionally try to send your program under the bus; you could also get run over in the process. There's a big difference between just being honest and intentionally trying to cause trouble.I did my internship in a medicine program that was previously given a "1 year renewal", which basically is the last step before probation. During the review process interviewers from the RRC interviewed every single resident in groups of 3-4 people and asked very specific questions about things like work hours and quality / quantity of education. They also had a stack of complaints submitted by residents which they asked us about. I'm talking even the most inane things like "indians get special treatment" were brought up during the interview.
If you have legitimate complaints about the quality of YOUR FEDERALLY FUNDED EDUCATION by all means write the ACGME. Even if you do so anonymously, your complaint will land on somebody's desk and eventually in a folder that will be used to beat the program director over the head when it comes to their next site review.
Things I would suggest:
1. Don't discuss your concerns with anyone in the hospital administration. The GME director may be golfing buddies with your PD and you may suffer all kinds of retaliation.
2. Do not inform anyone in the hospital of your intent to complain. These types of programs instill a culture of ruthless backstabbing among residents and your shoulder to cry on may burn you the first chance they get.
3. Show up on time, work hard and stay below the radar. I don't know where you went to med school but chances are you had to do quite a bit of self study. Residency is unfortunately more of the same.
So I am now told that we are not meeting our surgical numbers on a daily basis by senior residents (we simply do not have the volume). Yet when the ACGME case logs were reviewed, magically, everything was OK. Senior residents say that all programs "fudge numbers". Additionally, we are constantly encouraged to log in as attendings to confirm billing and export files. At my level of training, I am not on par surgically with any of my friends in the same field.
Residents take advantage of the system, leaving for hours at a time and hazing junior residents there is no leadership- only one full time faculty member in the entire department.
I expressed my concerns about these issues and am not alone, however reporting at this point would directly target me (as it is a very small program).
I would be willing to start my residency in this field over completely if given the opportunity and sacrifice the time I spent here. I just don't have that option, given the competitiveness of the field. What else can I do to survive this on a daily basis?
Looking for constructive feedback - already pretty upset and really would appreciate no hammering over the head. I know I am complaining, I am just trying to see the silver lining here. Is there hope?
Looking for constructive feedback - already pretty upset and really would appreciate no hammering over the head. I know I am complaining, I am just trying to see the silver lining here. Is there hope?
Probation sounds like a disastrous scenario and also unlikely, since I do care about my coresidents (and my own) future. We have reaccreditation for a few more years before another site visit.
It's incredible. After reviewing the ACGME guidelines, we meet very few of the criteria. We have a very low patient census (3-4 patients per resident most days, all day), in house lectures are scarce, no M&M, one grand rounds the entire year, no conferences, residents double logging as primary surgeons. Some of our attendings are not board certified and are operating (seniors are logging in as primary surgeon under different attendings). We are forced to purchase all of our own equipment (there is very little functional equipment). Last minute our director throws together mid year evaluation forms, has us all retroactively sign them, and puts up a song and dance about resources and numbers. I wonder how they allow this program to exist. It almost seems like someone is clearly not telling the truth or there has been a sloppy review of the program.
This is the time for me to learn and make mistakes. Right now, I feel like I have no clinical or surgical exposure and I have no idea if any change can be made. I am reading, is there anything else?
TO reply to a previous post: Yes, I have gone on one away week (during my vacation), unfortunately I am unable to assist in procedures at other institutions.
Probation sounds like a disastrous scenario and also unlikely, since I do care about my coresidents (and my own) future. We have reaccreditation for a few more years before another site visit.
It's incredible. After reviewing the ACGME guidelines, we meet very few of the criteria. We have a very low patient census (3-4 patients per resident most days, all day), in house lectures are scarce, no M&M, one grand rounds the entire year, no conferences, residents double logging as primary surgeons. Some of our attendings are not board certified and are operating (seniors are logging in as primary surgeon under different attendings). We are forced to purchase all of our own equipment (there is very little functional equipment). Last minute our director throws together mid year evaluation forms, has us all retroactively sign them, and puts up a song and dance about resources and numbers. I wonder how they allow this program to exist. It almost seems like someone is clearly not telling the truth or there has been a sloppy review of the program.
This is the time for me to learn and make mistakes. Right now, I feel like I have no clinical or surgical exposure and I have no idea if any change can be made. I am reading, is there anything else?
TO reply to a previous post: Yes, I have gone on one away week (during my vacation), unfortunately I am unable to assist in procedures at other institutions.
I wholeheartedly agree on the fellowship aspect. Unfortunately, we do not have many seniors match into fellowship. Of the four, one matched at a private clinic.
I can deal with the malignancy of the program, hazing by senior residents, and program director. I just hate that I may not be competent (as many seniors feel is the case when they graduate). Even our board pass rate is 25% by graduates (I am told).
The program went through a lot of changes when I arrived. We lost two surgical sites and gained one where residents were unable to do surgery as primary surgeons.
In addition to this, my program director is incredibly inappropriate with residents and is constantly threatening and making personal comments. This person isolates people and calls them names in front of other residents (even in front of the GME people). No one does anything.
A part of me wants to report everything to the ACGME, but if I am wrong about anything, I will lose my job and my career will be put into jeopardy. Or if I am right andwe are put on probation, I will be targeted. I wish that there was a way to have someone investigate the issues with my program without it affecting me or other residents.
To make matters worse, I think I am academic person who was targeted the moment I entered the door. Two nights ago my program director stopped me in the hall to ask if I had billed for an attending. When I told the pd that I did, they forcibly grabbed me by the wrist and told me not to tell them I had done something when I didn't. I calmly repeated that I had done it and left. I received an email yesterday saying that I needed to visit the hospital psychologist. Is this the process where they fire me?
I am so disheartened. I have no idea what I could even transfer into, I spent so much time and money on this field, if I could have matched somewhere else I would have been there already. This is the specialty that has usually already matched someone internally by the time that they post a vacancy.
This is scattered, but I am scared and amazed at how things have progressed.
Things you need to do:
1) STOP POSTING HERE. It is possible (probable) that you could be identified by people within your program based on the information you have saved here.
2) RECORD/SAVE EVERYTHING. If you have anything in writing (emails from PD, etc) to corroborate what you are posting, save it. Back it up outside the medical center's emails.
3) BURY YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND. Work your butt off and be the quiet soldier. Don't let your displeasure/thoughts show through.
4) FIND ALLIES. Within the program, or outside it. You need to identify some people who understand your situation and can help.
To make matters worse, I think I am academic person who was targeted the moment I entered the door. Two nights ago my program director stopped me in the hall to ask if I had billed for an attending. When I told the pd that I did, they forcibly grabbed me by the wrist and told me not to tell them I had done something when I didn't. I calmly repeated that I had done it and left. I received an email yesterday saying that I needed to visit the hospital psychologist. Is this the process where they fire me?
I am so disheartened. I have no idea what I could even transfer into, I spent so much time and money on this field, if I could have matched somewhere else I would have been there already. This is the specialty that has usually already matched someone internally by the time that they post a vacancy.
It could be that OP because of his high standards acts anxious around other people or has been too vocal in his criticism. This, in addition to the program wanting to threaten him, is enough to cause them to send him to a psychologist.