Probably. But honestly you don’t have to have a great differential. You just have to see that its bad…and get him out. There were quite a few times that with my limited knowledge about medicine that I was uncertain about someone’s diagnosis, but I’m surprised any GMO couldn’t determine that this was a dangerous situation. It makes me think that there were command structural problems at play.
I don't disagree entirely.
It really boils down to whether we think the GMOs phenomenon is good or bad. And I settle on the bad side.
There isn't a July PGY2 resident anywhere in the USA practicing unsupervised, without immediate support available from a senior resident and/or attending. Anyone who has been or has worked with an intern knows that there are gaps in knowledge, experience, and judgment (which necessarily comes from experience). And those gaps are often surprising.
Internships are highly variable in content and autonomy. Transitionals get a very different experience than categorical OB or medicine or surgery. Yet we put GMOs out there and expect the gaps that we KNOW are there to magically not be there.
It's mostly OK in garrison when help is (mostly) accessible. But I couldn't have been the only GMO at Camp Lejeune that was passively discouraged from leaning on the sports med clinic or attendings at the hospital.
And then they deploy, and are in remote locations.
I did some dumb things as a GMO but I don't think I hurt anyone.
But who knows? One of many examples: I was doing the mental health briefings coming home from an Iraq deployment that saw some intense combat, with multiple Marines KIA, 68 wounded badly enough to be CASEVAC'd home, and many more wounded but returned to duty. Me, a GMO who'd done a grand total of a few weeks of psych as an intern and a few more weeks as a MS3. I was grossly unqualified to be counseling and screening 1000 Marines after all that.
I mean, it's not like PTSD, substance abuse, and suicide are problems, right? It's a "low risk, young, healthy, pre-screened" population, right?
GMOs shouldn't exist. That we mostly get away with it and don't see a lot of overt M&M isn't a good defense. Most states won't even license a physician without 2+ years of GME.
So yeah - I agree and I don't think the differential in this case was especially complicated. I also would expect a non-trivial number of interns and July PGY2s to **** it up if pimped about it during morning report at the ol' teaching hospital. I am completely unsurprised when a servicemember who was evaluated by a GMO has a serious issue missed. And I contend those inevitable errors are mostly the service's fault for continuing to use the last millenium's GMO model a quarter of the way through this century.
Do you think any malpractice carrier would agree to insure these glorified interns, at any rate? I don't.