- Joined
- Jul 12, 2015
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 231
I'm well through the application cycle and I'm holding onto a DO acceptance and waiting on two post-II MD's (from my state schools). Pretty much rejected from the rest of the 20 or so MD programs I applied to. I've also been working in a bioinformatics lab my gap year.
I met a physician (MD) in my lab, we hit it off pretty well because we both studied physics as undergrads. He told me multiple times that if I want to be a leader in a field of research in medicine that I should get my PhD. He told me he's had multiple opportunities lost because he didn't have the particular skill set needed to lead a project. I don't doubt him and I'm sure he's right.
He advised me however to put off medical school and enter into a regular PhD program first, and then apply to MD's afterwards. This would mean I would have to apply to graduate school, finish the degree, retake the MCAT (mine will expire by then), and reapply.
I would consider it, but I just feel it would be a pretty big risk: My research background is pretty strong, but my GPA is low (3.25 science, after a 3.9 in a career changer postbac) and with over 120 credits under my belt there's no way it's getting near a competitive level. I managed to get 519 on the MCAT, but I seriously doubt I could pull it off again in 5 years. I consider myself lucky enough to have had those two MD II's to begin with, and re-applying MSTP is obviously a moonshot. He thinks I would be a more competitive candidate for MD programs after I get my PhD and I would have no problem retaking the MCAT.
So my question to you: Has my ship sailed? I prefer an honest answer, I've come to terms with my situation. I like research, I could see myself loving being a physician scientist, but I just feel getting an MD/PhD in either route is beyond a realistic possibility.
Thanks!
PS: WAMC thread I posted last year in case you wanted more info on my app https://www-forums.studentdoctor.ne...school-list-3-3-ugpa-3-9-postbac-519.1206770/
I met a physician (MD) in my lab, we hit it off pretty well because we both studied physics as undergrads. He told me multiple times that if I want to be a leader in a field of research in medicine that I should get my PhD. He told me he's had multiple opportunities lost because he didn't have the particular skill set needed to lead a project. I don't doubt him and I'm sure he's right.
He advised me however to put off medical school and enter into a regular PhD program first, and then apply to MD's afterwards. This would mean I would have to apply to graduate school, finish the degree, retake the MCAT (mine will expire by then), and reapply.
I would consider it, but I just feel it would be a pretty big risk: My research background is pretty strong, but my GPA is low (3.25 science, after a 3.9 in a career changer postbac) and with over 120 credits under my belt there's no way it's getting near a competitive level. I managed to get 519 on the MCAT, but I seriously doubt I could pull it off again in 5 years. I consider myself lucky enough to have had those two MD II's to begin with, and re-applying MSTP is obviously a moonshot. He thinks I would be a more competitive candidate for MD programs after I get my PhD and I would have no problem retaking the MCAT.
So my question to you: Has my ship sailed? I prefer an honest answer, I've come to terms with my situation. I like research, I could see myself loving being a physician scientist, but I just feel getting an MD/PhD in either route is beyond a realistic possibility.
Thanks!
PS: WAMC thread I posted last year in case you wanted more info on my app https://www-forums.studentdoctor.ne...school-list-3-3-ugpa-3-9-postbac-519.1206770/
Last edited: