Need Advice From You All for a Friend (Turn down acceptance?)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

freaker

Senior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
853
Reaction score
22
I'm in med school this year, but I have a buddy who is having a rough time getting in. He may, however, have just been accepted to a Midwest state school (he's an out-of-state California resident).

Here's the thing, this guy has a 4.0 GPA from a top school in a difficult science major. He scored in the 99% on the MCAT. He had clinical experience, research experience, some interesting work and life experience, not asocial by any means. The one thing that held him back was a lack of volunteer participation, which he is currently involved in now but wasn't when he applied.

Yield: 0 interviews at California schools.

So if he got into this school, I'd normally tell him that he's freaking nuts not to go. But he is gay and a little concerned that this particular city doesn't have a gay community. I have more trouble relating to that, so I felt a little bad showering his pity party with enthusiasm and congratulations.

In any case, how would his rejecting this acceptance and reapplying affect his admissions chances? Am I correct in thinking that you have to submit on your AMCAS whether you've been accepted to another med school before?

My gut instinct is to tell him to go, but that's not my decision.
 
Take it. There are closed-minded individuals in any city, but you can't let them stop you from living. Tell him to go. *Every* city has a gay community - whether it's an obvious one or not. I'm sure he'll be able to find friends and form relationships, etc, whether with straight or with gay people. But of course, it's up to him. But I wouldn't turn down an acceptance. His stats suggest he's definitely fit enough to get in to more schools next year, but if this is what he wants to do (medicine), and he doesn't mind putting himself in a new situation, I say go for it.

By the way, which city are we talking about?
 
Personally, in his situation, I'd take it. However, that said, I have a friend now in med school who did exactly what he's contemplating on doing but for different reasons.

Like your friend, my friend was a stellar candidate with all the right things on her application. Yet, her first time she didn't get into anywhere but the same place her dad did residency at which was out in the boonies and nowhere near her top choice. She'd gone to Northwestern for undergrad, did summer classes at Harvard, had research which was presented in Japan, had plenty of clinical work, and a 4.0 GPA. She even had a mid 30's MCAT score. But didn't get in anywhere including low tier schools. So she went and spoke with the school she was interested in and kept in constant contact with them and did what they suggested. She had an interview in january of the year she applied and is now in med school at her top choice. She also had interviews at other schools the second time around.

I'd talk with the adcoms at those schools where she's accepted and see what they say. Many times, admissions directors or other admissions personell might be helpful.

The moral of my story is that it is possible to get in elsewhere if you reapply.

However, it really is a matter of whether or not you are willing to spend another year of your life reapplying, or whether you are ready to just move on because this process is arduous and nerve wrecking.
 
I forgot to say:

this is why you shouldn't apply to schools you have no intention of attending.

I can't remember how many times I've made this post since joining SDN - it's like the gift that keeps on giving (or the good advice applicants keep ignoring/never consider).
 
Rafa said:
I forgot to say:

this is why you shouldn't apply to schools you have no intention of attending.

I can't remember how many times I've made this post since joining SDN - it's like the gift that keeps on giving (or the good advice applicants keep ignoring/never consider).


Very true. In my friend's case, I think she did it because of her father doing residency there. It was a poor backup decision. Nonetheless, I agree with you.
 
freaker said:
I'm in med school this year, but I have a buddy who is having a rough time getting in. He may, however, have just been accepted to a Midwest state school (he's an out-of-state California resident).

Here's the thing, this guy has a 4.0 GPA from a top school in a difficult science major. He scored in the 99% on the MCAT. He had clinical experience, research experience, some interesting work and life experience, not asocial by any means. The one thing that held him back was a lack of volunteer participation, which he is currently involved in now but wasn't when he applied.

Yield: 0 interviews at California schools.

So if he got into this school, I'd normally tell him that he's freaking nuts not to go. But he is gay and a little concerned that this particular city doesn't have a gay community. I have more trouble relating to that, so I felt a little bad showering his pity party with enthusiasm and congratulations.

In any case, how would his rejecting this acceptance and reapplying affect his admissions chances? Am I correct in thinking that you have to submit on your AMCAS whether you've been accepted to another med school before?

My gut instinct is to tell him to go, but that's not my decision.
Something sounds fishy as to why more schools didn't express interest. Was his application submitted late? Perhaps one of his LORs sold him up the river?

The only thing that I could find on the AMCAS Application Instructions that comes close to indicating an acceptance are as follows:

Have you applied to this medical school in previous years?
You must indicate if you have ever previously applied to this medical school, even if a secondary application from the school was not completed. Indicate previous application activity by clicking the radio button labeled "yes" below the question. Submission of an AMCAS application is tantamount to filing an initial application. Failure to acknowledge previous application activity will result in an investigation.

It makes no reference to previous acceptances. I suspect that this school may not be interested in him the next time around after spurning them, so I'd weigh heavily whether or not there is a chance to get in elsewhere next year. I severely doubt that his lack of volunteering played that much of a part in his not being invited for an interview.
 
MedicineNutt said:
Tell your friend to check himself for the Courage Program and apply next year if hes desperate of cali schools!!! this program will change his mind on a few things he's overlooking in his life...i dont think hes ever sat down to think about his life lately...this program works wonders for converting homosexuals!!

http://couragerc.net/PIPErroneousAssumptions.html (do some browsing here)

Tell him to call a Catholic Church to see the schedule for this program...all faiths are welcomed...they dont discriminate---trust me on this
Hmm... as a future scientist, I would hope that the evidence that these programs not only fail, but that they do more harm would convince you of their danger. No medical organization endorses conversion therapies of any type because the evidence proves again and again that conversion just doesn't work.
 
Flopotomist said:
Hmm... as a future scientist, I would hope that the evidence that these programs not only fail, but that they do more harm would convince you of their danger. No medical organization endorses conversion therapies of any type because the evidence proves again and again that conversion just doesn't work.
Flop,

You're wasting your breath, man. Either this guy really believes this stuff, in which case he's not going to listen to you anyway, or else he's trying to be funny. But either way, you aren't going to get anywhere by arguing with him. 🙄

OP: Yes, he does have to indicate that he's applied before, and the school will certainly remember him from last year. Some of the places I applied to a decade ago still had their old files on me. 😛 I think that he might find that most of his classmates don't care about his sexuality and even that many are accepting of it. Can he go second-look at the school? And can he ask the admissions office there to give him the name of a student there who is "out" that he can talk with to give him a better idea about what gay life is like there? It seems that most schools have an active GLBT group, so he should be able to find some current students to give him the inside story. I'd have to be really, really, REALLY convinced that the school was going to ruin my whole life and happiness before I'd be willing to endure this entire app process again....it's definitely not a decision to take lightly.
 
I would definitely give the school/area another shot before reapplying. It won't look good if he has turned down an acceptance and "it wasn't good enough for him" or however the school's want to perceive it. It sucks, but making the best out of the situation is what I would advise him to do. What city in the midwest is it?
 
freaker said:
I'm in med school this year, but I have a buddy who is having a rough time getting in. He may, however, have just been accepted to a Midwest state school (he's an out-of-state California resident).

<SNIP>
Yield: 0 interviews at California schools.

So if he got into this school, I'd normally tell him that he's freaking nuts not to go. But he is gay and a little concerned that this particular city doesn't have a gay community. I have more trouble relating to that, so I felt a little bad showering his pity party with enthusiasm and congratulations.

In any case, how would his rejecting this acceptance and reapplying affect his admissions chances? Am I correct in thinking that you have to submit on your AMCAS whether you've been accepted to another med school before?

My gut instinct is to tell him to go, but that's not my decision.

Hi there,
It looks like your friend must have wanted to go to the midwest medical school or else he would not have applied to the school in the first place. If he wants to be a physician, he will take his acceptance and go from there.

Four years of medical school go by very quickly and if your friend does well, he can do his residency in California. In fact, most of your fourth year can be spend doing away electives (in California) so that it's really more like three years if you count the summers off.

Also, as you probably know, most of your time is spent with the books and not in social circles. The books do not know if you are gay or straight and certainly those little scantron bubble could care less.

A bird in hand is always worth two in the bush and there are certainly no guarantees in the medical school acceptance business. If your friend wants to practice medicine, he will matriculate at the medical school that accepted him, fly home on holidays and vacations along with doing plenty of away electives in California. Who knows? He may find that his midwest medical school is more enlightened that he thinks.

njbmd 🙂
 
I really don't think he's worried about discrimination or not being accepted there. I'm a pretty darn conservative Christian, and while we have our different opinions and beliefs, we're still very good friends and get along well and feel fine even discussing those differences. No big deal. He seems fine with me; I'm fine with him.

I think he's more worried about just not having a community to feel a part of more than he's worried about discrimination. He's not a flamer out to draw attention to himself, anyway.

As for the Midwestern city, I rather not say because I didn't ask him for permission before I posted this. I'll just say that it's not one of the 5 largest.

I do tend to think that it's going to be seen as a negative for him to say that a school wasn't a good fit at this point, but I agree that talking to other schools that rejected him might be a very good idea.
 
Having a support group in med school is really important...and if your friend honestly feels that is not possible and there's no way to be happy at the school he was accepted to, he needs to figure out everything that was weak in his application this year to make it really stand out next year. Including applying really early (and only to schools he would consider going to), having a killer personal statement and LOR, and lots of meaningful volunteer experience to talk about (with passion). Did he get alot of interviews this cycle and just not acceptances? If so, he needs honest friends to sit down and interview him and give him constructive feedback.

Turning down an acceptance isn't smart, but if that's his choice he better make himself one heck of a good applicant this next cycle.
 
the premed advisor at my undergrad once said that if you only get in at a school you don't really want to attend, and then you decline your position, you may end up being blackballed at more than that one school the second time around -- indicates that you care more about what school you go to than entering the profession. i wouldn't take that risk. maybe he can talk to the advisor at his undergrad and confirm this?
 
freaker said:
So if he got into this school, I'd normally tell him that he's freaking nuts not to go. But he is gay and a little concerned that this particular city doesn't have a gay community. I have more trouble relating to that, so I felt a little bad showering his pity party with enthusiasm and congratulations.

Is the med school attached to an undergraduate/graduate institution? If so I guarantee that regardless of the city's size there will be a gay community.
 
Flopotomist said:
Hmm... as a future scientist, I would hope that the evidence that these programs not only fail, but that they do more harm would convince you of their danger. No medical organization endorses conversion therapies of any type because the evidence proves again and again that conversion just doesn't work.

yea, i was reading nutt's post too and had to read it again just to check if i was processing it right. seriously? conversion? i'm not a freakin cyclohexane ring. it doesn't really work that way.

as for advice for your friend? i would take the acceptance. although i find it odd that with a 4.0 and 99% mcat, he didn't get any interviews. was it the PS or did he just apply really late?
 
To the OP - I also wanted to say KUDOS to you for being able to have a difference of opinion with your friend, and yet still be able to be as supportive as you are. You rock.
 
Hari Kari said:
Something sounds fishy as to why more schools didn't express interest. Was his application submitted late? Perhaps one of his LORs sold him up the river?

The only thing that I could find on the AMCAS Application Instructions that comes close to indicating an acceptance are as follows:

Have you applied to this medical school in previous years?
You must indicate if you have ever previously applied to this medical school, even if a secondary application from the school was not completed. Indicate previous application activity by clicking the radio button labeled "yes" below the question. Submission of an AMCAS application is tantamount to filing an initial application. Failure to acknowledge previous application activity will result in an investigation.

It makes no reference to previous acceptances. I suspect that this school may not be interested in him the next time around after spurning them, so I'd weigh heavily whether or not there is a chance to get in elsewhere next year. I severely doubt that his lack of volunteering played that much of a part in his not being invited for an interview.


I believe he said it had to do with lack of volunteerism. Believe it or not, I know a few people who were rejected from almost every school for lack of volunteerism or some other EC related issues.
 
kirexhana said:
yea, i was reading nutt's post too and had to read it again just to check if i was processing it right. seriously? conversion? i'm not a freakin cyclohexane ring. it doesn't really work that way.

(live, at conversion camp)

Now what you need is a change in conformation. Too much steric strain and all that. Have you considered holding fewer substituents?

:laugh:
 
abc(123) said:
the premed advisor at my undergrad once said that if you only get in at a school you don't really want to attend, and then you decline your position, you may end up being blackballed at more than that one school the second time around -- indicates that you care more about what school you go to than entering the profession. i wouldn't take that risk. maybe he can talk to the advisor at his undergrad and confirm this?


Not necessarily always the case. I know quite a few students, including some here on SDN that reapplied to get in a school they felt more comfortable at. I know at USF, for instance, they don't discriminate based on the fact that you didn't go to another school. If you listen to them and improve your app, you've got a high chance with them. Other state schools where I live are like that too.
 
Rafa said:
(live, at conversion camp)

Now what you need is a change in conformation. Too much steric strain and all that. Have you considered holding fewer substituents?

:laugh:
:laugh: :laugh:
 
flippa7 said:
Is the med school attached to an undergraduate/graduate institution? If so I guarantee that regardless of the city's size there will be a gay community.

Nope. It's not really in a university town. Just kind of a larger town with just a health center there.

Thanks for the posts, guys!

I think I'll forward on some of this. He's till waiting on WashU and a few other places where he interviewed. It seemed like he felt better in St. Louis than this particular city, but we'll see.
 
At least the midwest school isn't Yeshiva/Einstein (See "Gay and thinking of Yeshiva/Einstein" thread)...Hehe :laugh: ...Sorry that was a bad joke, but I couldn't resist.

My advice- take the acceptance because another one may never come around. At least go visit the school and talk to gay students there to see if they have had okay experiences.
 
kirexhana said:
i'm not a freakin cyclohexane ring.

:laugh: you rock, kirexhana
 
freaker said:
Nope. It's not really in a university town. Just kind of a larger town with just a health center there.

Thanks for the posts, guys!

I think I'll forward on some of this. He's till waiting on WashU and a few other places where he interviewed. It seemed like he felt better in St. Louis than this particular city, but we'll see.

hey, i might be at wash u... he should go there! what's his name? is he cute? what's his sign? 😛
 
Rafa said:
(live, at conversion camp)

Now what you need is a change in conformation. Too much steric strain and all that. Have you considered holding fewer substituents?

:laugh:
well, i'd be happiest with a well endowed alkyl group that i could jack some electrons from. 😉

omg, i'm such a nerd, kill me now!
 
kirexhana said:
hey, i might be at wash u... he should go there! what's his name? is he cute? what's his sign? 😛

omg wtf just stop, just stop...this is absolutely outta hand!!!! you really exposed yourself...im not even practicing ignorance...it's just that homos are misguided b/c they think they're born with their behaivor/orientation---abs. not true!!! they choose that path themselves...it's really a struggle than genetic or whatever they call it
 
MedicineNutt said:
omg wtf just stop, just stop...this is absolutely outta hand!!!! you really exposed yourself...im not even practicing ignorance...it's just that homos are misguided b/c they think they're born with their behaivor/orientation---abs. not true!!! they choose that path themselves...it's really a struggle than genetic or whatever they call it

right, you would know, because you're such an expert on human sexuality. i was kidding, jerk, get over yourself.
 
MedicineNutt said:
omg wtf just stop, just stop...

If you'd followed 'wtf' with bbq, I'd have given you some sort of an award. That said, how do you know homos choose to be gay? I mean, if you're not gay, how do you know someone else - someone other than you - 'chose' to be gay?

For that matter, if you're straight, did you 'choose' to be straight, or were you born that way?

:late night sdn philosophy smiley:
 
Rafa said:
If you'd followed 'wtf' with bbq, I'd have given you some sort of an award. That said, how do you know homos choose to be gay? I mean, if you're not gay, how do you know someone else - someone other than you - 'chose' to be gay?

For that matter, if you're straight, did you 'choose' to be straight, or were you born that way?

:late night sdn philosophy smiley:

LOOOOOOOOOOL ok...here's my insight along with some research...afterall, there is nothing wrong with having homosexual thoughts, but acting upon them call for psycological disorders...this is what i believe in so take it or leave it!!

This article brings forward evidence to support the idea that some people can through therapy find to varying degrees success in moving to overcome the homosexual condition.

Surprise Results
In 1997, a large and history-making psychological study was released establishing clinically the effectiveness of psychotherapy for people desiring to overcome homosexuality. The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) conducted this study of 860 individuals who sought treatment because of unwanted homosexual feelings.

Two Years of Treatment
NARTH surveyed these clients before and alter two years of treatment in traditional therapy with more than two hundred psychologists and therapists. Two thirds of the clients were addressing exclusively homosexual attractions, and the other one third were addressing both homosexual and heterosexual attractions. 63% of these clients opted to continue in therapy at the end of two years, so the following results should be read as an interim report. (The language of the study avoids the labels ‘gay ‘ lesbian " and "bisexual " and simply describes feelings and behavior ‘)

treatmentdiagram9qf.jpg


Analysis of the Data

The number of study participants who were "exclusively or almost entirely homosexual" was reduced by 80% (from 584 at the beginning to 112 after two years). Thus, they experienced a marked increase of heterosexual feelings as a result of their therapy.
The number of people starting the study who were "exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual" was zero, and that number increased to 287 after two years of therapy. That’s an increase of 33%, which is the conventional success rate for all psychotherapy. Not everyone made this complete turnaround, but that number is enough to prove that many can make this change.
A survey after just two years of psychotherapy for any kind of deep-seated problem should be regarded just an interim progress report on the journey, and in fact 63% of participants did continue treatment.
854 participants (that’s 99%, or all but nine) called therapy "valuable" and "effective" even though not all had become fully heterosexual. Conventional therapy addresses the life problems which lie behind unwanted emotional conditions. The data suggest that the unwanted sexual feelings of these clients change at varying rates; however, what made therapy valuable to almost everyone is progress in addressing their underlying life problems.
Comments From Clients in the Study

A female participant stated:

"I never expected this much recovery. My relationships with men have greatly improved. I am able to relate sexually to my husband in a way I was never able to before. I’m learning to leave the familiar protective emotions of contempt, arrogance, pseudo-self-sufficiency, anger, and self-indulgence behind and practice the emotions of love instead."

A male participant stated:

"Change is extremely difficult and requires total commitment. But I have broken the terrible power that homosexuality had over me for so long. I haven’t been this light and happy since I was a child. People can and do change and become free."

Comment from the Director of the Study

The following statement by Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, Executive Director of NARTH, was included with the press release which announced the findings of the study:

"We should stop telling young people and others struggling with homosexuality that they’re stuck with it. Instead we should say, If you want to change, you can, like so many others who have."



Four Implications of the Results
These findings contradict what most Americans believe is possible for people with homosexual feelings. The data reported above contain four distinct surprises for all who view homosexuality with an open mind:

There exists a population of men and women who struggle with homosexual desires and persist in their desire to change even in the face of society’s message that they should give up that hope and accept their condition.

A significant minority of psychologists and therapists still offers, very much against the prevailing theory, treatment to assist people who want to be free of homosexuality.

Homosexuality has emotional and psychological causes which can be addressed in the context of traditional therapeutic counseling. In a majority of cases, such treatment gradually reduces same-sex attractions by addressing them as a symptom of other problems.

Such treatment can be effective for a large percentage of people who seek it. Furthermore, sexuality is not rigidly fixed, but very fluid and open to change. We didn’t know that because we had never heard about such successes.


Hope, But No Easy Answers
The Roman Catholic Church has always taught that same-sex attractions are objectively disordered. The NARTH report provides a clinical endorsement of that view as being hopeful, rather than self-condemning, for people who for reasons of faith or philosophy do not accept their own homosexual feelings as normal. This study does offer hope, but with important limitations:

Not everyone can afford psychotherapy or find a therapist who has the training, the experience, and the values to assist with this journey.
The deep emotional work entailed may not be an important enough priority to warrant the commitment required.
Not everyone who makes the effort succeeds if one defines success as eliminating homosexual feelings. If, however, success is defined as significant personal growth, then the great majority of people will find therapy effective,
Not everyone wants to overcome homosexuality. Treatment is only effective for people who value the discovery of their heterosexuality. To urge therapy on the unwilling is pointless


A Third Segment
One very vocal segment of people with homosexual feelings holds the dominant view that homosexuality is healthy and permanent. A second (and largely silenced) population vigorously disagrees and approaches homosexual attractions as a call to some unfinished growth. The NARTH study affirms that viewpoint. The third -- and perhaps biggest -- set of people remains undecided about whether to embrace or resist their homosexuality. This pamphlet is designed mostly for that population. It is intended simply to open up for them the option of a journey out of homosexuality. Another pamphlet in this series, "Six Areas of Personal Growth," maps out that journey.

Source : http://couragerc.net/PIPPsychTreatmentStudy.html
 
NapeSpikes said:
"NARTH"? :laugh:

You're kidding, right? (I hope?)

🙂 you read the study !!! yes, it's NARTH...btw i didnt write this
 
MollyMalone said:
👎

Bad form. Don't hijack this thread with this stuff. Take it to the Everyone forum, where it belongs.

it's whatever...just gave me 2 cents on it man !!! im not discriminating...
 
Was it something your grandparents recieved in the mail perhaps? The extreme right wing loves to prey upon the elderly while their mental faculties are in decline, always soliciting a donation. Most of the stuff that I've come across like that could be printed in the Weekly World News. Stop reading Grammy's mail.
 
MollyMalone said:
👎

Bad form. Don't hijack this thread with this stuff. Take it to the Everyone forum, where it belongs.

yea, back to the more important issue at hand...
 
one question for you K...Is it normal to be homosexual ??? (seriously)
 
freaker said:
Nope. It's not really in a university town. Just kind of a larger town with just a health center there.

Thanks for the posts, guys!

I think I'll forward on some of this. He's till waiting on WashU and a few other places where he interviewed. It seemed like he felt better in St. Louis than this particular city, but we'll see.

If it's MCW, tell him not to worry.
 
NapeSpikes said:
"NARTH"? :laugh:

You're kidding, right? (I hope?)
I think NARTH is the same league with NAMBLA.
Also, if it's WashU, don't worry. The Central West End (ie. the area around the med school) is filled with gays. The undergrad school also has lots of gays. The botanical gardens: they grow gay people there. I joke, but even as a straight guy I noticed St. Louis was pretty accommodating to gays. It's a city of 2.5 million people. There are plenty of queers.
 
If it has not been suggested already, check the COM website that he has been accepted in the Midwest and see what is available. I can tell you that Iowa (if he has been accepted at University of Iowa) has a pretty good support group for anyone who is GLBT.
 
jebus said:
I think NARTH is the same league with NAMBLA.

I just googled nambla to find out what it was.

Now, I will never be able to run for office. Damn you, google.
 
jebus said:
The botanical gardens: they grow gay people there.

hahaha, :laugh: even though this line was almost borderline offensive, it was still really funny to me. nice one.
 
freaker said:
I'm in med school this year, but I have a buddy who is having a rough time getting in. He may, however, have just been accepted to a Midwest state school (he's an out-of-state California resident).

Here's the thing, this guy has a 4.0 GPA from a top school in a difficult science major. He scored in the 99% on the MCAT. He had clinical experience, research experience, some interesting work and life experience, not asocial by any means. The one thing that held him back was a lack of volunteer participation, which he is currently involved in now but wasn't when he applied.

Yield: 0 interviews at California schools.

So if he got into this school, I'd normally tell him that he's freaking nuts not to go. But he is gay and a little concerned that this particular city doesn't have a gay community. I have more trouble relating to that, so I felt a little bad showering his pity party with enthusiasm and congratulations.

In any case, how would his rejecting this acceptance and reapplying affect his admissions chances? Am I correct in thinking that you have to submit on your AMCAS whether you've been accepted to another med school before?

My gut instinct is to tell him to go, but that's not my decision.
Besides contacting the school, he can try out various online people-hookup places like Craigslist. Use a familiar city as a standard, and compare the absorption patterns.

I am in a similar situation--waitlisted at all CA schools interviewed at AND current top acceptances are public midwest schools. Waiting on WashU as well. :laugh: [Hey K: Duke is a great school!]

Yes, one of my worries is the city's atmosphere. While the "gay community" issue doesn't apply here, I do worry that I won't fit well in the city's attitude. True anecdote: the cashier at a Burger King there laughed hysterically at me because I was wearing a pink band-aid on my finger. And when an admissions office lady mentioned how a certain neighborhood was "liberal" (I was looking for areas with cafes and bookshops), I checked it out for myself. It had nothing on Telegraph Avenue. The area didn't have much in cafes and bookshops either. The place does have a reputation as being less than accepting. Unknowledgeable people have called me a "***" or "gay" for being, well, rather "metrosexual" or enthusiastic. I don't need more of that where I end up.


And I just gotta throw out something for a second (dunt interpret as an attack on homosexual lifestyle): how do homosexuals feel about being likely genetic dead ends? Lets ignore surrogates/invitro/other relationships, mmkay. Without children, one's fitness is practically 0 (their siblings would need to reproduce like crazy to comphensate and that's unlikely in today's society). I cite wikipedia and my memories from evolutionary bio.
 
someperson said:
And I just gotta throw out something for a second (dunt interpret as an attack on homosexual lifestyle): how do homosexuals feel about being likely genetic dead ends? Lets ignore surrogates/invitro/other relationships, mmkay. Without children, one's fitness is practically 0 (their siblings would need to reproduce like crazy to comphensate and that's unlikely in today's society). I cite wikipedia and my memories from evolutionary bio.

I'm not gay, but I couldn't help jumping in :^) Some people just don't care about the evolutionary aspects of life. For example, if you adopt a kid, your genes aren't going to be passed down to future gens. But people do that anyway - straight or gay (predominantly straight, but that's a discussion for another thread). Point is, if you approach life from a sociobio perspective, then everything you do, consciously or unconsciously, will be for the sole purpose of increasing your genetic fitness. But most people don't approach it - life - that way. Of course, many folks settle down and have kids and whatnot, but to a lot of people, passing down the family name (and genes) ranks about as high as...the number 0. The knowledge that "even when I'm dead, copies of my genetic material will live on..." isn't something folks who just want to raise kids (via adoption), take care of others, be happy, etc. will necessarily consider.
 
"This is the first report of a full genome scan of sexual orientation in men. A sample of 456 individuals from 146 families with two or more gay brothers was genotyped with 403 microsatellite markers at 10-cM intervals. Given that previously reported evidence of maternal loading of transmission of sexual orientation could indicate epigenetic factors acting on autosomal genes, maximum likelihood estimations (mlod) scores were calculated separated for maternal, paternal, and combined transmission. The highest mlod score was 3.45 at a position near D7S798 in 7q36 with approximately equivalent maternal and paternal contributions. The second highest mlod score of 1.96 was located near D8S505 in 8p12, again with equal maternal and paternal contributions. A maternal origin effect was found near marker D10S217 in 10q26, with a mlod score of 1.81 for maternal meioses and no paternal contribution. We did not find linkage to Xq28 in the full sample, but given the previously reported evidence of linkage in this region, we conducted supplemental analyses to clarify these findings. First, we re-analyzed our previously reported data and found a mlod of 6.47. We then re-analyzed our current data, after limiting the sample to those families previously reported, and found a mlod of 1.99. These Xq28 findings are discussed in detail. The results of this first genome screen for normal variation in the behavioral trait of sexual orientation in males should encourage efforts to replicate these findings in new samples with denser linkage maps in the suggested regions."

http://www.springerlink.com/media/7ped06p2ym0jwve9dr02/contributions/3/x/c/x/3xcxqtb6x36aaap1.pdf

In other words - the search was decidedly inconclusive but there is evidence of a hereditary factor in homosexuality. However, all "candidate" genes that have been examined thus far and to which linkage was prior established (ex: androgen receptor gene, and part of Xq28) have been subsequently shown to not be linked at all to male homosexuality.

Take from this what you will.
 
The main real argument here with homosexuality is: psycological versus genetic...i dont plan to battle this b/c it will just end up being a logical war LOL
 
MedicineNutt said:
The main real argument here with homosexuality is: psycological versus genetic...i dont plan to battle this b/c it will just end up being a logical war LOL

Troll fodder. Please don't feed.
 
someperson said:
Hey K: Duke is a great school!

yea, i know it is and am considering them very seriously. it's just, it's durham, NC. with nothing around except empty plantation land for 30 miles. great school. very eh location, maybe second look will change my mind?
 
MollyMalone said:
👎

Bad form. Don't hijack this thread with this stuff. Take it to the Everyone forum, where it belongs.
Agreed.

MedicineNutt:

You're derailing the thread topic. Respect your fellow guests. You're welcome to take your discussion to the Everyone forum, but your posts are not appropriate here.
 
NapeSpikes said:
I just googled nambla to find out what it was.

Now, I will never be able to run for office. Damn you, google.

This just made me literally laugh out loud. Nice one, NapeSpikes!
 
freaker said:
...this guy has a 4.0 GPA from a top school in a difficult science major. He scored in the 99% on the MCAT. He had clinical experience, research experience, some interesting work and life experience, not asocial by any means. The one thing that held him back was a lack of volunteer participation, which he is currently involved in now but wasn't when he applied.

I would tell him to take a year off.

I make that statement assuming, however, that volunteering is the ONLY thing that is keeping him from getting in. If there is something else, then maybe just take what he can get now that he is in.

About the gay community thing... Unfortunately he is going to have to meet a lot of patients, collegues, nurses, superiors, professors, etc etc etc, in his lifetime that may be discriminatory toward him. Maybe 4 years in a place out of his comfort zone would be good for him. On the other hand, everyone needs a support system.
 
Top