Need Advice: SMP or Research MS

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

TeenCroissant08

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My the time I graduate in May 2025, I will have a cGPA of around 3.25 and an sGPA of 3.1. I should an upward trend in my grades over my last two semesters as well. I have already decided to pursue a Master's program after graduation but can't fully decide on whether to go for an SMP or a traditional research MS. My main reason for completing a master's is GPA repair. Post-bacc won't help much because I've already taken so many credits that my undergrad GPA largely won't move at all anymore.

My top choice for a research MS is UCLA's MS in Physiological Science. I've already spoken to a potential research mentor from there and she was really helpful/informative about all the questions I had. A benefit for a research MS is that it will allow me to gain research experience since I currently don't have any. This program specifically is one of the only ones I found that will allow me to conduct research in the field of Cardiology. This is my main interest and is also what the faculty member I spoke to focuses on. The program is in a hard science so while not an SMP, I think adcoms might still look upon it favorably if I do well. The biggest point of concern I have for this program, and other research MSs, is that it may not be the most beneficial for GPA repair due to potential grade inflation.

For SMP programs, the ones currently on my list are UMich MS in Physiology, BU MAMS, Tufts, and Georgetown. Biggest upside here is the potential for good GPA repair since the curriculum closely follows that of their respective M1s. Biggest downside is that I might go into my application cycle (apply in 2026) with zero research experience. This could hurt my app since my stats are already low. Side question: is the UMich program considered an SMP? It doesn't list SMP anywhere on the website but seems structured in that way. It is tied to the medical school.

Which type of program would be the best option for me to pursue? Medical school is the ultimate goal but a research MS could also provide good skills for a backup plan. Though, I do not want to settle for a back up plan. The SMP is what I've seen most people recommend especially over on SDN (including Goro). But, I've also seen a lot of people talk about how a traditional MS was very helpful to them if it's in a hard science. I like the UCLA program a lot and the faculty member is also willing to write me a letter of support if I apply there. She also said there is a good chance I can secure a TA or GRA position and get tuition waived along with a stipend. UCLA's program seems great it's just the lack of being an SMP which is what I'm scared about. Don't want to invest all this time for it to not help me in my end goal.

ECs:
Over 1,000 hours of clinical experience (as an ophthalmic tech). Don't have anything else really at this time, but have a plan to build upon this with volunteering etc. by the time I apply in 2026.

Have not taken MCAT yet. Just started content review. Planning to test summer 2025.

Any insight you can provide is appreciated.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Given your GPA, you are not a candidate for a top tier research focused medical school. They want to see research but all the research in the world would not mitigate your GPA and that's not movable at this point so I can't recommend putting any focus at this point on a research degree.

What you need is evidence that you can handle the academic portion of medical school and the solution is the SMP. You are essentially betting the cost of attendance that you can out-perform the average medical student. Be sure you have repaired any poor study habits, issues around time management, mental health issues, etc before embarking on this high stakes grad program. You either do well and get the golden ticket to med school or GAME OVER as you have demonstrated that you don't have what it takes to succeed academically in medical school.

It is likely as a MS -1 you won't have time for non-clinical community service so build up that side of your portfolio before launching into the SMP.
 
Given your GPA, you are not a candidate for a top tier research focused medical school. They want to see research but all the research in the world would not mitigate your GPA and that's not movable at this point so I can't recommend putting any focus at this point on a research degree.

What you need is evidence that you can handle the academic portion of medical school and the solution is the SMP. You are essentially betting the cost of attendance that you can out-perform the average medical student. Be sure you have repaired any poor study habits, issues around time management, mental health issues, etc before embarking on this high stakes grad program. You either do well and get the golden ticket to med school or GAME OVER as you have demonstrated that you don't have what it takes to succeed academically in medical school.

It is likely as a MS -1 you won't have time for non-clinical community service so build up that side of your portfolio before launching into the SMP.
If I were to perform well in a master's program (say an SMP for this instance) and get a GPA of 3.7+ along with a competitive MCAT score, are top tier schools still out of the question? Is my ceiling at this point mid to low tier MDs and DOs regardless of how well I perform in an SMP and on the MCAT? Secondly, I've seen that there are some SMPs that incorporate research/a thesis into the curriculum. Should I look at these programs at all or only coursework based ones?
 
SMP.

MD schools want to see that ypu can handle medical school courses, not Electrophysiology Techniques or Research Seminars
Even if the curriculum for the traditional MS program includes lecture style hard science courses? Like the UCLA one offers many different physiology courses about the various systems in the body. Or do adcoms not give these any substance due to potential grade inflation?
 
Don't have any at the moment but this is something I plan to work on. Any advice on how exactly to address this? Should I just look at volunteering at local organization?
Did you read the guide?

If I were to perform well in a master's program (say an SMP for this instance) and get a GPA of 3.7+ along with a competitive MCAT score, are top tier schools still out of the question? Is my ceiling at this point mid to low tier MDs and DOs regardless of how well I perform in an SMP and on the MCAT? Secondly, I've seen that there are some SMPs that incorporate research/a thesis into the curriculum. Should I look at these programs at all or only coursework based ones?
Many top tier schools have plenty of applicants who don't need an SMP to boost their undergrad GPA's, so while they may say they welcome non-traditional applicants, their matriculating class demographics may be much different. Some schools reward reinvention better than others, but the brand schools don't necessarily need to do it unless you show a strong mission fit, which may include impact with research or with community. If you feel you want to take the extra research year to boost your profile for the brand-name schools, that's your choice and your budget (time and money).

Your expectations should be to get into the right school that supports you, not for the brand name on the diploma. Your patients don't care where you went to school.

Even if the curriculum for the traditional MS program includes lecture style hard science courses? Like the UCLA one offers many different physiology courses about the various systems in the body. Or do adcoms not give these any substance due to potential grade inflation?
How many students are in these lectures? Do you get to discuss cases? Do you get SHELF exams to test your physiology content? Do the faculty have experience to write committee/program letters?

The more important question is whether there are articulation agreements that can fast-track you to an interview and hopefully an acceptance with satisfactory performance.
 
Even if the curriculum for the traditional MS program includes lecture style hard science courses? Like the UCLA one offers many different physiology courses about the various systems in the body. Or do adcoms not give these any substance due to potential grade inflation?
Read my post on reinvention for premeds
 
If I were to perform well in a master's program (say an SMP for this instance) and get a GPA of 3.7+ along with a competitive MCAT score, are top tier schools still out of the question? Is my ceiling at this point mid to low tier MDs and DOs regardless of how well I perform in an SMP and on the MCAT?
The stereotypical top tier matriculant will have a cGPA of 3.8-4.0, an MCAT >520, a productive research trail with publication, and hundreds to thousands of hours of service. Not infrequently they have some additional noteworthy accomplishment(s), like Fulbright, D1 athlete, Peace Corp, etc.

Right now you have a cGPA of 3.25 and the equivalent 6 months of full-time employment. I'm not trying to sound harsh on this day of thanks, but the gulf between your current app and that of a successful top tier app is vast. Also, applying in 2026 is an extremely aggressive timeline to fix everything that needs to be fixed.

1. If you have not already done so, determine why your GPA suffered early in undergrad and address those issues.
2. Forget applying in a specific cycle. You will apply when your application is competitive.
3. SMP all the way (a MS will not help you at all).
4. Start a quality non-clincial volunteering experience (homeless shelter, soup kitchen, etc.) yesterday and start builidng up hours.

The MCAT is going to be very important for you, but it's not a right-now problem. Worry about it when you get the SMP figured out.
 
The stereotypical top tier matriculant will have a cGPA of 3.8-4.0, an MCAT >520, a productive research trail with publication, and hundreds to thousands of hours of service. Not infrequently they have some additional noteworthy accomplishment(s), like Fulbright, D1 athlete, Peace Corp, etc.

Right now you have a cGPA of 3.25 and the equivalent 6 months of full-time employment. I'm not trying to sound harsh on this day of thanks, but the gulf between your current app and that of a successful top tier app is vast. Also, applying in 2026 is an extremely aggressive timeline to fix everything that needs to be fixed.

1. If you have not already done so, determine why your GPA suffered early in undergrad and address those issues.
2. Forget applying in a specific cycle. You will apply when your application is competitive.
3. SMP all the way (a MS will not help you at all).
4. Start a quality non-clincial volunteering experience (homeless shelter, soup kitchen, etc.) yesterday and start builidng up hours.

The MCAT is going to be very important for you, but it's not a right-now problem. Worry about it when you get the SMP figured out.
I have already taken the steps to address why I did poorly in courses in the past and seemed to have largely fixed the issues. I expect to end this semester with 3 A's, 2 A-'s, and a B+. I am going to continue to build upon this and hopefully in my final semester I can end with a 4.0 for that term.

Now that I know an SMP is the way to help my app, I'm going to finalize my list of programs and hopefully start working on those applications during the winter break.

I'll start researching volunteering opportunities as well.

Lastly, in regards to the MCAT, do you recommend stopping the content review I just started doing? Did you mean I should worry about the MCAT after I figure out which SMP I'm going to attend or after I finish whichever program I end up choosing?

Thank you again and Happy Holidays.
 
Last edited:
Lastly, in regards to the MCAT, do you recommend stopping the content review I just started doing? Did you mean I should worry about the MCAT after I figure out which SMP I'm going to attend or after I finish whichever program I end up choosing?
The latter. There are many SMPs, and they are all structured somewhat differently. Some are much more intentional about MCAT prep than others. Either way a decent SMP will have solid advising about when and how you should take the exam.

Good luck.
 
Top