People of SDN, I need some candid opinions on MSN degrees from top brick and mortar programs. Give it to me straight.
I'm 32, with an objectively good job outside of healthcare that I do not enjoy. I bailed on preparing to apply to medical school in college because I was lazy back then and found a much less time-consuming route to a high paying career. But unfortunately, I realized a little late that money doesn't a happy person make if you spend 6-7 days a week, 51 weeks a year doing work you find boring. I thus want to go back to school to develop a career in healthcare. I have considered NP/PA, as well as just biting the bullet and working on DO/MD prerequisites and taking that MCAT.
Having crunched the numbers and calculated the extent of the spectacular financial implosion that would result if I pursued MD/DO, I've settled on pursuing a mid-level position - NP or PA.
I was originally leaning toward NP school because it would be less of a financial hit for various reasons and would be easier to begin (no prior HCE required for an ABSN degree), but then I compared the curricula of some of the top five MSN programs in the country (per USNWR, for what that's worth) to the PA schools at the same universities. The MSN programs had a few classes that sounded concrete - like pathophysiology. But then they also had a lot of very vague sounding classes that seemed to be of dubious value. The PA programs, on the other hand, had the types of classes I expected - like cardiology, pulmonology, etc.
I thought it was weird and concerning, and then I read all of the criticism of the NP profession on this website, which I am trying to evaluate. And my question is this: Is the criticism the result of the fact that there seem to be tons of crappy MSN programs out there where you can pay $15k and get an online "master's" degree? Is this where the incompetent NPs are coming from? Or is the criticism geared toward the NP profession as a whole?
In other words, if I went to one of the top five MSN programs - like Duke, Penn, or Emory and worked full-time as an RN while doing the MSN part time over threeish years, could I be comfortable that I would, with the requisite on-the-job training, be one of the "good" NPs that are competent and trusted by physicians? Or are even the top brick and mortar MSN programs churning out some duds?
If there's serious doubt that I would get good training at even the best brick and mortar MSN programs, I will bite the bullet and work as a phlebotomist or something to get HCE for PA school.
Your thoughts are much appreciated.
I'm 32, with an objectively good job outside of healthcare that I do not enjoy. I bailed on preparing to apply to medical school in college because I was lazy back then and found a much less time-consuming route to a high paying career. But unfortunately, I realized a little late that money doesn't a happy person make if you spend 6-7 days a week, 51 weeks a year doing work you find boring. I thus want to go back to school to develop a career in healthcare. I have considered NP/PA, as well as just biting the bullet and working on DO/MD prerequisites and taking that MCAT.
Having crunched the numbers and calculated the extent of the spectacular financial implosion that would result if I pursued MD/DO, I've settled on pursuing a mid-level position - NP or PA.
I was originally leaning toward NP school because it would be less of a financial hit for various reasons and would be easier to begin (no prior HCE required for an ABSN degree), but then I compared the curricula of some of the top five MSN programs in the country (per USNWR, for what that's worth) to the PA schools at the same universities. The MSN programs had a few classes that sounded concrete - like pathophysiology. But then they also had a lot of very vague sounding classes that seemed to be of dubious value. The PA programs, on the other hand, had the types of classes I expected - like cardiology, pulmonology, etc.
I thought it was weird and concerning, and then I read all of the criticism of the NP profession on this website, which I am trying to evaluate. And my question is this: Is the criticism the result of the fact that there seem to be tons of crappy MSN programs out there where you can pay $15k and get an online "master's" degree? Is this where the incompetent NPs are coming from? Or is the criticism geared toward the NP profession as a whole?
In other words, if I went to one of the top five MSN programs - like Duke, Penn, or Emory and worked full-time as an RN while doing the MSN part time over threeish years, could I be comfortable that I would, with the requisite on-the-job training, be one of the "good" NPs that are competent and trusted by physicians? Or are even the top brick and mortar MSN programs churning out some duds?
If there's serious doubt that I would get good training at even the best brick and mortar MSN programs, I will bite the bullet and work as a phlebotomist or something to get HCE for PA school.
Your thoughts are much appreciated.