I don't know about that. There's always an attending on the record in theory, but as a resident, you are often writing orders unsupervised, and are the one making the decision as to whether there is something you need to wake up the attending about. Don't underestimate your ability to injure a patient as a resident. You are OFTEN the only one to see a patient on overnights...A better argument is always going to be that a lot of patient care, and most of the codes, happen after hours.
dragonfly99 said:
Residents and interns on overnight call are the ones providing the care. In general there is no attending or fellow present, unless you are in the ER or something. YOU are the one writing the orders and doing procedures so being tired definitely can affect patient care. However, so could having a doc who doesn't know the patients. Doing 30 hour call is just something you have to get used to if you are doing surgery or IM or maybe peds at a hospital that still has a traditional call system. But I agree it is definitely malignant to complain about residents leaving at 30 hours. In hindsight I think that 24ish hour calls would have been much better...we always had to stay 30 and even at times had clinci postcall, which was definitely brutal. Sometimes patients would remark that I seemed tired (I would think "NO ****!").
You are confusing arguments. My point was that important decisions are made by the attending during daytime hours. I claimed that the pilot analogy was false, as the resident is not making important decisions after having been on for 27 hours, because that should be about 9am, a time when the attending is in house, the day team is back, etc... and that resident shouldn't be in the position to have to make those big decisions. Overnight, if something bad is about to happen or happens, it is the resident on call's duty to go up the chain of command to inform the true decision makers for the patient's care. Any mistakes made in medication dosing should be caught either by the nurse or the pharmacist. Furthermore, decisions made overnight occur within the first 24 hours of the shift, not the last six (of a 30 hour shift). The argument being made here (this thread) is against a 30-hour shift, not a 24-hour shift. If errors were to occur overnight, they would occur anyway in the 24-hour shift supported by dragonfly.
Law2Doc said:
I do agree that med school call makes overnights seem more doable. But I'm not sure that's the real justification for call.
It may not be the justification, but it helps in the adjustment to long working days. On my surgery rotation, I was Q3; on OB/Gyn, medicine and pediatrics, I was Q4. On surgery, we didn't go home post-call until around 4 pm most days (our educational conference was in the afternoon and we were expected to stay for it). On medicine and peds, we went home around 1 (after lunch conference). On OB/Gyn, we went home after morning rounds (~25 hours). After that "conditioning," I've never really had any trouble as a resident working the 24-30 hour shifts when I have to (my hours as a resident are actually much less due to the 80-hour work week implementation and being at a program that has a night float system for the residents).
I agree that, with the exception of the ICU, a 30-hour day really isn't necessary (at least in surgery, when our rounds are over by 7am except in the ICU, which is why I make that the exception). I do think the post-call resident should be present for rounds, as they are the ones most familiar with the current status of each patient, but I don't think they really need to be present to do anything following rounds.
exPCM said:
If physicians were truly caring about their colleagues then the IOM recommendations for 5 hours protected sleep time each night should have been implemented yesterday. Instead residency programs are dragging their feet on this. I remember reading that interns/residents have an increased rate of MVAs post call which is likely fatigue related.
All the talk here about using drugs to try and get through this is sad.
I agree that talk about people using drugs to try and get through this is sad. However, that is the American way. We all complain about how are patients would rather have a pill to do something for them (lose weight, control diabetes, etc...) than modify themselves to get something accomplished. Residents before us were working 36 hours on Q2 call without many of the drugs mentioned (as they didn't exist). I'm not saying the system was right, I'm simply saying generations of physicians did it before us without that crutch.
As addressed by Law2Doc, there are several reasons the IOM recommendations haven't been implemented. The feasibility of implementation of such a plan is quite difficult, especially for some smaller sub-specialties or small programs with few residents. What you would end up with is an already overburdened cross-covering resident responsible for twice the number of patients they currently cover to allow for the protected sleep time, leading to an arguably worse patient care environment.