new do school in washington state

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

murph

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
it was announced yesterday that a new DO school would be opened in 2007 in Yakima, Wa. it will be named pacific northwest university of health sciences school of Osteopathic medicine. I went to the news conference. It will be a private school, and they will be starting a neuro-surgery residency for Do's. For more info look up the Yakima herald republic

Murph 🙂
 
"New medical school planned
By JAMES JOYCE III
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC


A new four-year medical school plans to make Yakima its home.

And Dr. Gregory Mick wants to see that happen by the fall of 2007, he said in a news conference Thursday morning.

Mick, a Yakima neurosurgeon, serves as the president of the newly formed Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, a private, nonprofit institution that plans to teach osteopathic medicine to about 100 new medical students a year.

University officials anticipate luring students from Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Alaska.

First, though, the university must be accredited by the American Osteopathic Association. Mick said that process is already under way, but a spokesperson from the medical association said no correspondence had come in from the school as of Thursday.

The accreditation process includes an on-site visit and a feasibility study that must be approved by the AOA at least 14 months before the intended opening date.

University officials would not say where the school will be located because they are still in negotiations to purchase property. But Mick did say they were considering the location where Thursday's press conference was held, in the Iron Horse Lodge Building, 111 S. 33rd St. in Terrace Heights, and hope to have a site solidified within a week.

Once up and running, the local medical school will be the only institution of its kind in the Northwest and one of about 20 nationwide. Three others are currently seeking accreditation, but for now the closest existing osteopathic medical school is in Vallejo, Calif.

Osteopathic medicine emphasizes a holistic approach that incorporates preventive health care. It's one of the fastest growing health-care disciplines in the country, according to the AOA, which represents more than 54,000 osteopathic physicians.

Dr. Lloyd Butler, a retired family practitioner from Sunnyside and vice president of the university, said the school's major focus now is fund-raising. Initial plans involve building an 80,000-square-foot facility that will support instruction and administration with hopes of eventually growing into a 30-acre campus that could include other colleges under health sciences. School sponsors are raising $20 million to support the new facilities and operating costs and claim they have already secured $3 million in commitments.

University officials did not rule out the possibility of joint ventures with other universities, but they are not linked to any other institutions yet.

Mick said the school plans to conduct nationwide searches to fill the approximately 40 faculty positions, though he hopes to fill some of those positions with local practicing physicians.

"We hope to bring some stellar people into the community," he said, adding that the school would bring an additional 40 to 50 jobs for support staff.

Along with fund-raising, the board of directors will be working on establishing a curriculum that Mick said will be "old school," emphasizing the holistic approach to medicine. "


http://www.yakima-herald.com/
 
They shouldn't worry about AOA approval as Dr. Thomas was pleased to make this announcement earlier this week at PCOM.
 
SWeeet Thats about when I will be applying! Im from Seattle and this sounds great!
 
cool! more opportunity for people to stay in-state 👍
 
cheapdate said:
cool! more opportunity for people to stay in-state 👍

That is actually really good location. Only 2hrs from Seatle and 4.5 hours from Vancouver, BC. My Home.

So the first class will not start till Aug.2007. 2 Years from now.
Maybe it is too late to go there.. but maybe do 4th year rotations close by.
 
This is fantastic - pretty soon we will have a DO program in every strip mall in America.
 
I just complained about not having DO schools up in the pacific northwest on another post. This is great!! Hopefully, I'll be in med school by then.

👍
 
DEFINITELY GOOD! Finally more DO programs in northwest. About friggin time. I think it will be hard first 10 years to really establish in that area though.
Also, they better create residency programs. One thing i dont like about new schools, is if they dont create residency programs!! 👎
 
unk_fxn said:
This is fantastic - pretty soon we will have a DO program in every strip mall in America.
:laugh: Did you notice they also said "Three others are currently seeking accreditation, but for now the closest existing osteopathic medical school is in Vallejo, Calif. "
 
Well at least they have neurosurgery? Lol. That's so specialized (wonderful field though). Hopefully they will establish internal med, family med, EM, etc too.
 
Why not Idaho or Wyoming? Or Alaska?
 
I've been saying that they should open a DO school in that area for months now, it sounds like the AOA is getting serious - hopefully this med school bonanza will be mirrored by a jump in strong residency positions. Especially since the AMA (or AAMC) President recently complained about ACGME positions being taken by IMG/FMGs and DOs, which made me a little nervous about the prospects of the AMA shutting non-LCME accredited schools out of the National Match. :scared: I hope this wouldn't happen (and can't see it happening soon), but I'm sure others have had similar nightmares. Here's hoping that the AOA turned down the joint match for a reason which they had been hiding up their sleeve, and not merely because of what seems to be an arrogant and reactionary position. 🙄

What do you guys think? 😕
 
If I understand Dr. Thomas correctly, the DO school in the northwest will be created after there are viable DO residencies up there.

Right now the AOA is trying to start/create new DO residencies in the area ... with the goal of having enough to support a new medical school

I don't think it will open by 2007. There will be needs for lots of fundraising, and then construction along w/ hiring basic science faculty and getting curriculum approval and provisional accreditation. 2 years is just too quick. Remember, there were attempts to create a DO school a few years back in Utah/Colorado but that attempt failed. But since there is a great need for a medical school in this area, I think it will come to fruition, just not in 2 years time.

Now the big question is - will UWash's and OSHU's affliated hospitals allow these new DO students to do rotations there ... or will it be the situation in Arizona, where relationship b/w AZCOM and UofA is tense? Will the new school need to convince non-teaching hospitals to become teaching hospitals for DO students? Lots of questions

But a good start
 
docbill said:
That is actually really good location. Only 2hrs from Seatle and 4.5 hours from Vancouver, BC. My Home.
I think starting a DO school in Washington is a great idea, but do you really think Yakima is a good location? It doesn't seem to be the most attractive place to live.
 
Better than Kirksville, I think.
 
VUMD2be said:
"New medical school planned
By JAMES JOYCE III
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC


A new four-year medical school plans to make Yakima its home.

And Dr. Gregory Mick wants to see that happen by the fall of 2007, he said in a news conference Thursday morning.

Mick, a Yakima neurosurgeon, serves as the president of the newly formed Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, a private, nonprofit institution that plans to teach osteopathic medicine to about 100 new medical students a year.

University officials anticipate luring students from Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Alaska.

First, though, the university must be accredited by the American Osteopathic Association. Mick said that process is already under way, but a spokesperson from the medical association said no correspondence had come in from the school as of Thursday.

The accreditation process includes an on-site visit and a feasibility study that must be approved by the AOA at least 14 months before the intended opening date.

University officials would not say where the school will be located because they are still in negotiations to purchase property. But Mick did say they were considering the location where Thursday's press conference was held, in the Iron Horse Lodge Building, 111 S. 33rd St. in Terrace Heights, and hope to have a site solidified within a week.

Once up and running, the local medical school will be the only institution of its kind in the Northwest and one of about 20 nationwide. Three others are currently seeking accreditation, but for now the closest existing osteopathic medical school is in Vallejo, Calif.

Osteopathic medicine emphasizes a holistic approach that incorporates preventive health care. It's one of the fastest growing health-care disciplines in the country, according to the AOA, which represents more than 54,000 osteopathic physicians.

Dr. Lloyd Butler, a retired family practitioner from Sunnyside and vice president of the university, said the school's major focus now is fund-raising. Initial plans involve building an 80,000-square-foot facility that will support instruction and administration with hopes of eventually growing into a 30-acre campus that could include other colleges under health sciences. School sponsors are raising $20 million to support the new facilities and operating costs and claim they have already secured $3 million in commitments.

University officials did not rule out the possibility of joint ventures with other universities, but they are not linked to any other institutions yet.

Mick said the school plans to conduct nationwide searches to fill the approximately 40 faculty positions, though he hopes to fill some of those positions with local practicing physicians.

"We hope to bring some stellar people into the community," he said, adding that the school would bring an additional 40 to 50 jobs for support staff.

Along with fund-raising, the board of directors will be working on establishing a curriculum that Mick said will be "old school," emphasizing the holistic approach to medicine. "


http://www.yakima-herald.com/




Cool! :clap: :clap:
 
COMP just started it's northwest track this year, which allows students to do their rotations in WA, OR, MT, ID and WY i think. hopefully that means that there are plenty of places that are already friendly towards DOs.
 
subtle1epiphany said:
the AMA (or AAMC) President recently complained about ACGME positions being taken by IMG/FMGs and DOs

Can you show us this quote?
 
subtle1epiphany said:
Especially since the AMA (or AAMC) President recently complained about ACGME positions being taken by IMG/FMGs and DOs

Are you sure about this? When was this exactly and where did you hear/read this?
 
Osteopathic schools need to increase our numbers, without compromise.
There are only 23 schools (including branch campuses) across the country.
There are already 125 allopathic medical schools in the USA.
What harm is there to have more Osteopathic Schools opening?
There are a lot of qualified applicants that don't make it into medical school, due to limited space, etc.
The number of Osteopathic graduates has doubled within the last decade or so, and I think this scares the AMA. I think the increase in Osteopathic physicians is great for our profession, and for our communities overall.
 
medicine1 said:
Osteopathic schools need to increase our numbers, without compromise.
There are only 23 schools (including branch campuses) across the country.
There are already 125 allopathic medical schools in the USA.
What harm is there to have more Osteopathic Schools opening?
There are a lot of qualified applicants that don't make it into medical school, due to limited space, etc.
The number of Osteopathic graduates has doubled within the last decade or so, and I think this scares the AMA. I think the increase in Osteopathic physicians is great for our profession, and for our communities overall.

The harm is the future lack of residency positions, especially with the possibility of the AMA closing MD residencies to DO's. Worse than not having a large number of quality DO residencies would be being forced to do poor DO residencies because of no more access to MD ones.
As for a lot of qualified applicants that don't make it - what are you basing that on? There are a lot of unqualified applicants that DO get in...
 
This is from the link. I see nothing wrong with what he is saying. Contrary, he is being open minded to greater cooperation. Does the AOA feel the same way? NO.

Osteopathic medical schools: After more than a century of often bitterly contentious relationships between the osteopathic and allopathic medical professions, we now find ourselves living at a time when osteopathic and allopathic graduates are both sought after by many of the same residency programs; are in most instances both licensed by the same licensing boards; are both privileged by many of the same hospitals; and are found in appreciable numbers on the faculties of each other's medical schools.

One clear difference is that, while the number of LCME graduates has remained virtually constant over the past 25 years, the number of osteopathic graduates has more than doubled (from about 1,150 to about 2,600) and is expected to increase to 3,300 by the year 2010 and to perhaps 4,000 by 2015.

Many believe, as I do, that the educational model championed by our community and upheld by the LCME's rigorous processes offers the best preparation for future physicians, all of whom will be challenged to keep abreast of unpredictable scientific developments. But many also believe, as I do, that our country's two medical professions ought to reconcile what differences remain between them and begin working more closely together to advance the public's interest. All of which raises at least two important questions: (1) Do those of us steeped in the allopathic tradition have an obligation to substantiate the advantages of adhering to the LCME standards undergirding our educational model? (2) Do we have an obligation to assist our osteopathic colleagues in ensuring that all U.S. medical school graduates, irrespective of differences in practice philosophy, meet the same exacting educational standards?
 
sunnyjohn said:
Why not Idaho or Wyoming? Or Alaska?

Because Washington state has a more central location between Alaska and the rest of the Northwest states. Additionally people from Idaho and Montana can easily drive to Yakima.

I did think Yakima was an interesting site, why not Spokane? Or Bellingham? which would be sweet since Bellingham would be near Vancouver, British Columbia.
 
As a graduating osteopathic medical student, I don't believe this rapid expansion by osteopathic medical schools is a good thing. Like posters have brought up, several osteopathic residencies are, at best, marginal...and till we can create better graduate training programs, creating another money-making institution ( because that's what most private OMS hve become) is only going to graduate more physicians who will be heartbroken when it comes to applying to competitive specialties. I was lucky enough to match into a field that I love, but since there are no osteopathic residencies available in that field (radiation oncology), I had to go the allopathic route.

While it may be great that the Pacific Northwest gets an OMS, the nationwide trend to more than triple graduating osteopathic medical students over the past 20 or so years is, in my opinion, going to create some serious turf issues with LCME accredited schools. While they are clamping down on the number of students to keep up with jobs etc, we continue to grow almost exponentially. And when there are 4000 osteopathic students competing with all the MD grads for residencies, but none of them are eligible to apply for ours (not that most of them want to), its going to create fewer opportunities four our grads to enter the allopathic residency spots (because face it, while there are some excellent osteopathic graduate programs, there are many more excellent allopathic training programs)...

I'll probably get flamed, but this is what I have gathered on the interview trail and from experiences of my fellow classmates...
 
UHS05 said:
As a graduating osteopathic medical student, I don't believe this rapid expansion by osteopathic medical schools is a good dthing. QUOTE]

So I am curious what are future D.O.s doing about this problem? Forgive me for my ignorance but I hear so many contradictory statements by people in osteopathy I am not sure what to think. Maybe ill go allopathic to avoid all of this. Don't you think two years is a bit opptimistic for an opening date of the new school? Try 7 years :scared:
 
docbill said:
This is from the link. I see nothing wrong with what he is saying. Contrary, he is being open minded to greater cooperation. Does the AOA feel the same way? NO.

Osteopathic medical schools: After more than a century of often bitterly contentious relationships between the osteopathic and allopathic medical professions, we now find ourselves living at a time when osteopathic and allopathic graduates are both sought after by many of the same residency programs; are in most instances both licensed by the same licensing boards; are both privileged by many of the same hospitals; and are found in appreciable numbers on the faculties of each other's medical schools.

One clear difference is that, while the number of LCME graduates has remained virtually constant over the past 25 years, the number of osteopathic graduates has more than doubled (from about 1,150 to about 2,600) and is expected to increase to 3,300 by the year 2010 and to perhaps 4,000 by 2015.

Many believe, as I do, that the educational model championed by our community and upheld by the LCME's rigorous processes offers the best preparation for future physicians, all of whom will be challenged to keep abreast of unpredictable scientific developments. But many also believe, as I do, that our country's two medical professions ought to reconcile what differences remain between them and begin working more closely together to advance the public's interest. All of which raises at least two important questions: (1) Do those of us steeped in the allopathic tradition have an obligation to substantiate the advantages of adhering to the LCME standards undergirding our educational model? (2) Do we have an obligation to assist our osteopathic colleagues in ensuring that all U.S. medical school graduates, irrespective of differences in practice philosophy, meet the same exacting educational standards?
I also saw the message as an open minded approach to the problem. The AOA needes to wake up and realize were not out on the prarie anymore!! We all end up treating patients with medicine!
 
Why are some people mad that there are new osteopathic schools opening? I understand that there is a shortage of good osteopathic residencies but if there is a healthcare need someone needs to fill it. In my hometown in rural North Dakota there is usually a two - three week wait to see a Doc. We have a state funded allopathic medical school but it doesn't even come close in putting out the Docs that the state needs. We get stuck with foreign docs from India and nurses from the Philippians who can't speak a lick of english. Hurray for osteopathic medicine for seeing and acting on the healthcare needs of the growing Northwest. 🙂
 
Actually, the loop hole was just filled that the school must be stable and from my understanding must have a start on residency programs for it's graduates. Now the problem with residency programs is that they must be approved by the federal govt. for finacing. This is all information according to the SOMA conference in D.C.
 
"professions ought to reconcile what differences remain between them and begin working more closely together to advance the public's interest."

hmmmm......what about M.D.O as a new title????? 😀
I think its good that the west coast is starting to open up to osteopaths, hopefully it will end the "bone doctor" comments :meanie:
 
I don't understand why many people are getting upset about opening more D.O. schools. Most D.O. go into primary care and last year only 41% of family prac. postions were filled. Internal Med and Peds are pretty close as well. Besides the Federal Goverments controls the funding for residency, which has been frozen for a few years.
another point is AMA has pointed to the shortage of doctors in the comeing year and have asked all existeding medical school to explain their class size by 15%. Yet there has been no talk of creating more residencys. My point being that for primary care there are tons of residencys that go unfilled every year.
 
sunnyjohn said:
Why not Idaho or Wyoming? Or Alaska?


it has to be close to the gorge
 
As a west coaster transplanted to the east, I must say that Im glad that there is a DO school in the works in WA, its been needed, and from what I remember in undergrad, there was once talk of a school starting in Spokane (which I think makes more sense than Yakima....talk about the armpit of the beautiful state)....
Anyway, I express more concern over these popup schools and branch campuses (mine included) without an increase of QUALITY GME. Yes there are plenty of positions that go unfilled, but for good reason. Quite a lot of DO positions are at community hospitals with less than 120beds where there is absolutely no pathology.

On a side note....the statistic about most DOs going into PC is rather an interesting one if you look closer. The AOA recognizes any DO who did an AOA approved internship as a Primary Care doctor. So therefore, all those surgeons out there who did DO residencies or the AOA intern and then an ACGME residency are classified as PC. An internist who did a fellowship in cardiology is still PC, or even yet, that radiologist is a PCP....lovely.
 
ItsGavinC said:
They're both on equal footing in my book. Neither is the end of the world, but you can SEE the end of the world from each location.

trust me Yakima is worlds better then Kirksville, ya the yakima valley isnt all that, but you have some of the most beautiful scenery in North American less then an hour west. Not to mention if you stand on the hills above yakima you have an awesome view of the largest glaciated peaks in the Lower 48 states. Im excited!

T
 
I would hate to see the ACGME programs closed to DO graduates, but I do see Dr. Cohen's point. He is saying that if there is a mandatory increase in MD medical school positions, it is highly likely that the ACGME programs would be able to fill with nearly all US graduates in most specialties. But to restrict DO's from the match would really not be necessary anyway since by default most programs would choose a mostly US MD group of residents. But, there are always going to be a select group of DO grads that have the stats that are equal or better to than the MD applicants for the same specialty. My opinion is that if DO's want to compete when this happens, then they better start requiring their grads to take the USMLE so that program directors can confidently rank DO's versus MD's in the match. As it stands now, you have DO's with good COMLEX scores applying for competitive residencies and getting in without taking the USMLE. This is what will likely change. What I think Dr. Cohen should consider instead of restricting DO's from the match would be to instead just be to require them to take the USMLE and then compare apples to apples. Truth be told, and not to offend my fellow DO candidates, but most DO students will not do as well on the USMLE as MD students on average, and not because of any difference in training. It is mostly due to a difference in academic savy. But whether or not this makes a better physician is debatable. But what I say is compare MD, DO, and FMG applicants all against each other in terms of grades, interviews, LOR's, and USMLE's. Plus, I think all DO schools should require their students to take the NBME Shelf exams as our school does. This really could help program directors to know how to compare a DO to their MD applicants.

My honest belief is that in the future, 3 things will happen. First, DO programs will slowly take on LCME accreditation, starting with schools like TCOM that are heavily governed by allopathic trained DO's. Second, these graduates will graduate with 2 degrees, and thus these schools will quickly become some of the most sought after programs in the country because it is known that many MD students would like to learn OMM. Third, the AOA will likely loose influence once these institutions take on a dual role, and eventually the dual schools will one by one choose to dissassociate with the AOA. And one day, we will probably all be MD's, and who even knows if OMM will even be taught. I like the idea of DO schools granting both degrees, as I feel that is the best of both worlds and truly what we as DO's are already. But seeing that only 70% of DO's who take the USMLE pass it the first time, my guess is that DO schools will have to grant the dual degree in order to recruit the best students who could indeed pass the USMLE. It cannot work in reverse order, or potentially there would be a year or 2 where 30% of the class would not pass boards. Because obviously to be dually accredited, you would have to pass COMLEX and USMLE. But this is future talk and no one can predict the future.

But the bottom line is that I understand what Dr. Cohen is saying. I just don't think he really needed to say it because it is obvious that there will be fewer spots for lesser qualified DO's or FMG's when there are 15% more US MD's coming out of school. I am not talking about the highly competitive DO grads, because I believe these people will continue to get top positions.
 
Love to hear perspective from some of those peeps on the West Coast. Whatever happens with the Washington AOA site, it is extremely important to retain a big-picture outlook when dealing with a possible physician shortage. As many other posters have pouinted out, the education of a physician does not stop with MD or DO graduation. Well rounded and competent physicians MUST have access to strong clinical rotations in addition to solid post graduate opportunities. The LCME and the ACGME do (at the very least) a consistent job of ensuring basic standards.

The AOA, conversely, struggles with residency issues in addition to clinical education. I've received an extremely strong foundation from NSUCOM but our third and fourth year rotations are extremely variable. It is possible for one student to complete three months of in hospital medicine at an 800+ bed level I trauma tertiary referral facility and have another student finish up two subspecialty rotations at a 150 bed community hospital. In the rush to spit out more graduates, AOA sponsored CEMEs/OPTIs affiliate with any hospital willing to host free labor. Not to diminish the contribution of smaller community hospitals, but the differences between some of our, "core" facilities are striking. In regular conversations with my classmates, some of them carry a patient load of 3-4 and are out every weekday by 2:00 pm. This type of schedule creates entirely different intellectual demands and study habits than does an IM schedule involving a high census, ICU players, and call every fourth night. I am not a medical education specialist nor do I have any solutions for the AOA in terms of consistency. What is apparent, however, is that equality with our MD colleagues means STANDARDIZATION. The idea of moving towards LCME accreditation presupposes that every "complete" medical school in the USA graduates physicians capable of passing the same board exams and solving the same clinical programs. Whether accreditation is done by the AOA, LCME, or your mother, it is imperative to uphold and reinforce the quality of a stateside medical education. I would strongly hope that new osteopathic medical schools are launched with a firm committment to clinical AND graduate education opportunities. Training agreements should be established with hospitals boasting a strong track record of student/intern or resident education.
Obviously, community hospitals are a vital part of the healthcare system. Physicians should be prepared to enter community, academic, or tertiary care based practice. Small, community, and non teaching hospitals should be integrated into the medical education model only if they can provide students with the necessary experience. It makes little sense, for example, to utilize a 100 bed facility for a core internal medicine rotation where no educational framework exists. My core osteopathic teaching facility (Broward General Medical Center), for example, is not a statuatory teaching hospital. Nonetheless, the institution makes a sincere commitment to medical education through grand rounds, tumor boards, and an active internal medicine teaching service. The hospital hosts three residency programs and provides physicians in training with high volume and high pathology. Hospitals affiliated with allopathic or osteopathic schools need to make similar arrangements. Otherwise, we run the risk of graduating students who lack an appropriate clinical foundation. The lack of AOA post graduate training spots is another issue altogether that demands serious review prior to the opening of new osteopathic schools.
I enjoyed reading the article found at the AAMC link and hope that the AOA embraces the concept of a joint/collaborative accreditation process. The results of such a process will afford future DO students and graduates continued opportunity for superior training.

-PuSh
 
This is an article from the Yakima newspaper that reported on the potential
new Osteopathic school in Yakima on 15Apr05 following the businesswire
article on 14Apr05. The hospital was run by Providence until 2003 when it
was purchased by another company. This company seems to be significantly
understaffing the hospital.

This type of problem cannot be solved by increasing the supply of qualified
physicians, nurses, technicians and other staff.

date: 25May05
source: http://www.yakima-herald.com/?storyid=289217510811988

Doctors detail safety worries in hospital ER
By CHARLENE KOSKI
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC

Outraged at allegations they resigned for financial reasons, Yakima Regional Medical and Cardiac Center's emergency physicians confirmed Tuesday that they wrote a document describing more than 25 recent emergency-room incidents that they believe could've been disastrous.

The document, which physicians now verify they wrote collaboratively to demonstrate the need for more staff at Yakima Regional, was sent anonymously last week to local media outlets. Until Tuesday, the physicians would not confirm they had written it, citing labor negotiation restrictions.

That changed Tuesday, when sections of the 13-page memorandum were posted on a television station's Web site, and hospital administrator Tim Trottier was quoted in the Yakima Herald-Republic saying that the doctors' concerns were a tactic to gain financial concessions from the hospital.

"That statement is so ludicrous," emergency physician Marty Brueggemann said of Trottier's comment. "How does it make sense that we're going to give up our pay to make more money?"

Brueggemann spoke on behalf of all the departing ER physicians.

Though the doctors claim Regional administrators brushed aside patient-safety concerns for more than a year, Trottier insisted in a statement released Tuesday night that the hospital has listened to and reviewed the physicians' written concerns. And Regional has dealt with, or is dealing with, any legitimate patient care issues, his statement said.

"Patient safety is Yakima Regional's first priority, and the hospital has a number of processes in place to deal with quality issues," Trottier wrote.

Last week, hospital officials and the physicians' attorney confirmed that all eight of Yakima Regional's physicians were resigning as of midnight June 2. The physicians cited patient safety issues caused by low staffing levels as the reason for their departure.

The physicians were working under a contract they'd established with the hospital's previous owner, nonprofit Providence Health Systems. For-profit Health Management Associates Inc. purchased the hospital in August 2003.

The doctors' contract was through December 2006, but they say they gave 90-day notice to Yakima Regional on March 4 after the hospital failed to adequately address the physicians' staffing concerns.

Frustrated, the doctors — who belong to the negotiating group Yakima Emergency Physicians — decided to document cases in the emergency room that would support their claims of staffing shortages.

Their hope, Brueggemann said, was that even if they were leaving, patient safety issues might still be addressed.

The doctors recorded about 25 cases that they say occurred in the emergency room between March 2 and April 12, and in late April presented those cases to the hospital's advisory board and administrators, including Trottier.

The document states that the cases presented "are merely the cases that were documented, and represent only a sampling of the events that we are noticing on a daily basis."

Topics addressed in the physicians' memorandum include:

* Cuts in technical, secretarial, pharmacy and intravenous support staff.

* Difficulties with the hospital's computerized record system.

* Mistakes in laboratory services.

* Delays in testing.

* Overworked nurses.

* Unnecessary and risky patient transfers due to staffing shortages.

The doctors complained that nurses are quitting the hospital and being replaced with less-qualified staff; that remaining nurses are being asked to perform too many tasks; and that the renovated emergency room created more space for patients, but that there aren't enough employees to properly deal with those patients.

The physicians also wrote that they were "unaware of any catastrophic outcomes related to the events outlined in this document. However ... it is only a matter of time before one does occur. As such, we feel it is necessary to dissociate ourselves from Regional hospital and to discontinue our practice there due to the conditions we now find ourselves facing."

Trottier, however, insists that care in the hospital's emergency department is first-rate.

In his Tuesday statement, he emphasized that the most current patient satisfaction survey results, taken between January and March of this year, indicate a 94 percent patient satisfaction rate for patient care, and a 97 percent overall rating in the emergency room.

All emergency room patients receive a survey, hospital officials said.

Earlier this week, Trottier announced that national physician recruiting firm EmCare would be filling the vacant physician positions, effective June 3. He said EmCare's expertise will improve care in the hospital's emergency department.

All of the resigning physicians say they've been contacted by EmCare and offered jobs at Yakima Regional. According to EmCare's Web site, the Yakima positions include a "competitive hourly rate" and "generous" signing bonuses.

All of the departing physicians rejected the offers, Brueggemann said.

Who's leaving?

Names of the departing emergency room physicians, and their approximate length of time at Yakima Regional Medical and Cardiac Center:

1. Dave Olson, 25 years.

2. Sam Booth, 20 years.

3. Richard Plunkett, 15 years.

4. Regan Wylie, five years.

5. Michael Hauke, five years.

6. Robert Johnson, three years.

7. Marty Brueggemann, one year.

8. Christopher Rhead, five years (left in April for job in California hospital).

9. Joel Heinzen, 30 years (retired, but has been helping fill in since Rhead left).

WHY THEY QUIT:

A document prepared by emergency physicians at Yakima Regional Medical and Cardiac Center listed more than 25 anecdotes to support their claims of staffing shortages at the hospital. The document, which the physicians sent to Regional administrators and which was mailed anonymously to the Yakima Herald-Republic last week, states that all of the examples occurred between March 2 and April 12. Here are some excerpts:

LABORATORY MIX-UPS — "Dr. Wylie had a case of a patient in which she had thought to obtain a (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) level. This came back markedly elevated, so she went in to give the results to the patient and explain what this meant. The patient listened to her, and then informed her that nobody had ever drawn her blood. It was determined that the result belonged to a different patient, who had already been discharged from the ER ... There are several other cases where the blood of two patients has been switched. I recall one specifically of a small child who was very apprehensive about having his blood drawn in the first place. After the mix-up, we were unsure whose blood was whose, so we were forced to redraw both patients."

RISKY TRANSFERS — "A ... trauma patient was seen in the ER after a skiing accident. In addition to a closed head injury, he suffered a C7 fracture in his vertebral column. Although two ICU beds were available, no nurses were available. This patient was transferred to Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital. Although transfers present risks for ANY patient, they are particularly risky for a patient with a potential spinal cord injury, where one wrong movement, or minor traffic accident, could result in catastrophic consequences."

DANGEROUS DELAYS — "An 18-year-old pregnant patient presented to the ER with vaginal bleeding and cramping abdominal pain documented ... Her presentation time is documented as 19:15. After triage, she was returned to the waiting room where she sat for about 90 minutes waiting for a room. At 20:40 the Emergency Department Physician went into the room and found the patient crying and still with her clothes on. No pelvic equipment was available and the patient was placed in a 'fast track' room where she was not in sight of any nursing station. An ultrasound was ordered and the patient was diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy. After consultation with OB/GYN, methotrexate was ordered. However, since there was no nighttime pharmacist, and because the nursing supervisor is not allowed to get that particular medicine, it had to be ordered from the Yakima Valley Memorial pharmacy and a courier had to be sent to pick it up. The courier was the (emergency department) secretary!"

OVERWORKED STAFF — "A 76-year-old patient with a history of congestive heart failure presented at 20:09 with 'shortness of breath'... This patient had a documented allergy to latex, as noted on the triage form. She was also sick... A latex-free cart was requested, but nobody seemed to know where to find it. A makeshift cart was put together in the ER by the nurses, but they were not able to get to the cart until 22:05, two hours later! Delivering the latex-free cart was the responsibility of the nursing supervisor, who was tied up with other duties."

GENERAL DETERIORATION IN CARE — "A 39-year-old patient was placed by an outpatient employee in a room that had not yet been cleaned or prepared by staff after the last patient had occupied it. The Emergency Department Physician went into the room and found the patient sitting in a chair. The bed was still dirty, there were cups, used tissues, and bodily fluids in the room that had not been cleaned up yet."
 
subtle1epiphany said:
I've been saying that they should open a DO school in that area for months now, it sounds like the AOA is getting serious - hopefully this med school bonanza will be mirrored by a jump in strong residency positions. Especially since the AMA (or AAMC) President recently complained about ACGME positions being taken by IMG/FMGs and DOs, which made me a little nervous about the prospects of the AMA shutting non-LCME accredited schools out of the National Match. :scared: I hope this wouldn't happen (and can't see it happening soon), but I'm sure others have had similar nightmares. Here's hoping that the AOA turned down the joint match for a reason which they had been hiding up their sleeve, and not merely because of what seems to be an arrogant and reactionary position. 🙄

What do you guys think? 😕

he cant close out nonlcme students can he?? those are GOVERNMENT funded positions for the most part, and the gov sees DO=MD. 😕
 
FMGP8P said:
I think starting a DO school in Washington is a great idea, but do you really think Yakima is a good location? It doesn't seem to be the most attractive place to live.

What the heck is wrong with Yakima? What? It's not Seattle! 🙄

Yeah, 300 days of sunshine a year, access to the Cascades, class 3 and 4 whitewater rafting in your backyard, rolling hillsides, etc...

Sure, it's more of a desert region. There is a very large Hispanic population there, so it kind of stinks if you don't speak Spanish and hate Mexican food.

I personally think it's best not be locating another D.O. school in Portland or Seattle or any of the sprawling suburbs shooting out in every direction. Given the osteopathic medicine's emphasis on holistic medicine and primary care, I think it makes a bit more sense to be locating in areas similar to where such physicians are needed.

Yeah, if you asked me, I would have guessed Spokane.

I do think it might make more sense to put a D.O. school in some place like Billings, Montana, or Casper or Cody, Wyoming, though.
 
espbeliever said:
he cant close out nonlcme students can he?? those are GOVERNMENT funded positions for the most part, and the gov sees DO=MD. 😕

This is correct. DO's are in no danger of losing access to ACGME programs. The AMA does not control these residencies. They are government funded and can not discriminate MD from DO from IMG.
 
murph said:
it was announced yesterday that a new DO school would be opened in 2007 in Yakima, Wa. it will be named pacific northwest university of health sciences school of Osteopathic medicine. I went to the news conference. It will be a private school, and they will be starting a neuro-surgery residency for Do's. For more info look up the Yakima herald republic

Murph 🙂

Yakima is such a hole.....why in the world would can't they open it up in Spokane, Wa, which is a heck of of nicer place to live....yakima bites!
 
Diasagree! Yakima is a beautiful town with incredible opportunities for outdoor activities. If I applied again, I would definately consider Yakima! Very exciting. Kirksville on the otherhand is a HOLE! Might actually include Pamona on the list too! 🙂
 
Maxmuscle27 said:
Yakima is such a hole.....why in the world would can't they open it up in Spokane, Wa, which is a heck of of nicer place to live....yakima bites!

It has been widely reported (in the Spokesman Review) that UWSOM is in talks about expanding/starting a new school in Spokane. Just a few years too late to help me any!
 
Top