can you provides some links? What have you been reading? Why do you think that this information might be accurate? If it is accurate, why might it be relevant to a medical student? IF so, does it apply to Columbia P&S or to Cornell as well?
I'm talking about the comments on the AMSA career development program. I'm asking because those comments could be old. However, I can't imagine such a large hospital changing this fast. The Cornell students did not seem to have the same problem with ancillary services.
I'm talking about the comments on the AMSA career development program. I'm asking because those comments could be old. However, I can't imagine such a large hospital changing this fast. The Cornell students did not seem to have the same problem with ancillary services.
So, this looks to be the expressed opinion of 2 students out of the 6 students who have completed the questionnaire. One states that the poor ancillary sevices means that students learn better clinical skills. (If you can't get a chest film at 2 a.m., you might learn to use asculatate a chest like it's 1908, is that a bad thing?)
The students might be doing a bit more scut (blood draws, dressing changes are mentioned) than at other schools but does it take away from the experience of being a med student? (Taking a good look at a wound is sometimes helpful in catching a problem while it is still managable; a nurse or technician may not recognize & report a problem in its earliest stages).
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.