- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
Anyone know anything about the New York path residencies? I'm from California and have heard the low down on a lot of the programs out here, but am clueless about the New York ones. Thanks.
AndyMilonakis said:Why do the NYC programs suffer compared to Boston, Philly, and Hopkins? What factors make you conclude this?
yaah said:I belong to the latter group, but then again I don't really like NYC and wouldn't live there unless I made $10 million a year.
Yeah, you're not gonna be pleased with the Bay Area, Boston, or NYC.beary said:My impression is that you practically need $10 million a year to get a decent place to live in NYC.
I have never thought of myself as particularly materialistic, but I find cost of living to be one of the biggest factors for me as I consider interviews.
yaah said:Because on my interviews and in my med school a lot of people told me this. Of course, I didn't interview in NY. 😉
yaah said:Yeah it's kind of amazing when you figure out that "well, I could spend that $200 a month on parking or I could go on a vacation instead" or something to that effect. My place here would cost about $500k in Boston area, at least. And it would be 80 years old, creaky, and have poor insulation and cost more to heat. And there would be on the street parking. I mean for some people it's a reasonable tradeoff to want to be in a city. For me, no. I'm happy.
ChipLeader said:I applied to Columbia and Cornell - I think they are both very good programs but lately I'm not sure I wanna live in NYC so I may not even go to the interview if invited. But, if Cornell hooks you up with sweet housing, I may have to reconsider... 😳
Bradybeluga said:Anyone know anything about the New York path residencies? I'm from California and have heard the low down on a lot of the programs out here, but am clueless about the New York ones. Thanks.
aviva said:Cornell and Columbia both offer amazing housing. The apartments are huge (and not just by NY standards) and the views are priceless. The Columbia couples housing are about 1000 sq ft and the rent is about $1500 which is very reasonable for NY. Cornell's apartments are known to be slightly cheaper and the area is much better.
EvilNewbie said:Well, I interviewed at some New York programs and I didn't think they were that spectacular. Mount Sinai has way, way, way too much volume and the residents there were averaging 130's in autopsies. I don't like autopsy THAT much, actually I don't like it at all. Did you guys see the pathology department? That place is the ugliest place I have ever seen, the halls were cramped with bins and crap and there stuff was so old, I thought it was a museum or something. I didn't interview at Columbia or Cornell but I heard the housing is crap and its on a month-to-month basis (means no guarantee)and there have been instances (that I was told of) where a resident was kicked out for an incoming resident without much warning. I interviewed at St. Luke's but I don't remember much about it (I did remember that they took me to 3 different hospitals for interviews though). I declined the NYU and SUNY-Brooklyn interview. I decide not to rank any NY programs cause its way too expensive to live there.
I interviewed at Cornell and I didn't get the impression that housing was only guaranteed on a month-to-month basis. Housing in Manhattan is very expensive and Cornell does subsidize a good chunk of it. However, the difference that you end up paying, I thought, was still too much than what I was accustomed to. The housing is quite convenient in that you can literally walk just a few blocks to get to the hospital. If you're lucky, you can live right across the street from the hospital I think. But again, when you interview, you may not hear the horror stories...anywhere you go, you will tend to hear mostly the positives and people will shy away from telling you any horror stories.EvilNewbie said:I didn't interview at Columbia or Cornell but I heard the housing is crap and its on a month-to-month basis (means no guarantee)and there have been instances (that I was told of) where a resident was kicked out for an incoming resident without much warning.
pathfinder said:Anybody knows about the Albert Einstein program in Bronx? You can hardly find anything on the internet. Their information in FREIDA is useless. I'd appreciate it if someone could shed some light on this program.
Yes, he is the AP director (at least he was when I was there)yaah said:Is Dr Pullman there? He was at UMass when I was a med student there - great teacher and a great guy, expert at many different things.
Moochie said:Would love to find a well respected NYC program with reasonable hours-- community or university affiliated, doesn't matter. Anyone know of one?
desmangt said:Red Flag
EvilNewbie said:Well, I interviewed at some New York programs and I didn't think they were that spectacular. Mount Sinai has way, way, way too much volume and the residents there were averaging 130's in autopsies. I don't like autopsy THAT much, actually I don't like it at all. Did you guys see the pathology department? That place is the ugliest place I have ever seen, the halls were cramped with bins and crap and there stuff was so old, I thought it was a museum or something. I didn't interview at Columbia or Cornell but I heard the housing is crap and its on a month-to-month basis (means no guarantee)and there have been instances (that I was told of) where a resident was kicked out for an incoming resident without much warning. I interviewed at St. Luke's but I don't remember much about it (I did remember that they took me to 3 different hospitals for interviews though). I declined the NYU and SUNY-Brooklyn interview. I decide not to rank any NY programs cause its way too expensive to live there.
yaah said:If you're averaging 50 hours a week you are not seeing more cases than most residency programs. Unless you are including clin path in there as well. On the average surg path day I spend 12-14 hours.
That post sparked a little discussion when a fellow resident came over to hang out while I was previewing. We took a break and I showed him this post since he complains about working too much. I'm not joking when I saw this...he saw "Mt. Sinai" and "50 hours" and almost fell out of his chair.yaah said:If you're averaging 50 hours a week you are not seeing more cases than most residency programs. Unless you are including clin path in there as well. On the average surg path day I spend 12-14 hours.
AndyMilonakis said:That post sparked a little discussion when a fellow resident came over to hang out while I was previewing. We took a break and I showed him this post since he complains about working too much. I'm not joking when I saw this...he saw "Mt. Sinai" and "50 hours" and almost fell out of his chair.
Here's how I would try to interpret this...perhaps the residents there have lots of dedicated scope time and minimal grossing with the PA and ancillary staff support. Maybe they don't have to spend an hour just getting paperwork together. I'm assuming that this poster is not averaging 50 hours a week on SURGICAL pathology rotations.
Seriously, if you take frozen section coverage and grossing out of the equation, your days are very reasonable.
I think people underestimate the power of pattern recognition. Personally, I would rather see more cases with my own eyes rather than reading a textbook. Plus, patients don't always follow the textbook so relying on the textbook rather than experience can be quite restrictive and crippling.sinaility said:Hi Andy! I would like to say that your posts are hilarious.
With regards to our program, I would have to say that one of the main advantages of having so much volume is that the residents really develop an eye for pattern recognition.
I actually think it's more stressful when you ARE the attending and it's YOUR ass that's on the line. As a resident, I am totally fine with putting a few guesses down for hard cases, dotting the areas in question on the slide, and moving on. As an attending, you're the last line of defense against an erroneous diagnosis.I've seen some of the senior residents fly through over 5 trays of biopsies previewing in like an hour and be 100% correct (I know this because I had to cover for a senior once who gave me all of their cases to sign out with a provisional diagnosis written on the sheets). The same thing applies to grossing here as well. Efficiency is built into the core of your training because otherwise you will drown. That's why we have such great job placement when we get out of here. It can be stressful though, but so is being an attending pathologist when you are finished with your training.
Well, f*ck. I better get back to previewing instead of horsing around. geddy, if you remember him...he used to post on here, was previewing in the next door room and i've been playing fart jokes on him. OK...better stop this chicanery or I'm never going home.Don't get me wrong, we have LOTS of work to do, but you learn DAY #1 that twiddling your thumbs all day means you will be there until 3:00am. We do have a pretty good amount of ancillary staff that keeps the scut down, so I really appreciate that component of the department.
AndyMilonakis said:geddy, if you remember him...he used to post on here,
I don't. But I see him every day and we help each other out but also give each other a lotta crap just for sh*ts and giggles.beary said:Tell geddy to come back! I miss his posts!
Moochie said:Would love to find a well respected NYC program with reasonable hours-- community or university affiliated, doesn't matter. Anyone know of one?
Moochie said:Ouch!... I think
Here's the deal-- I'm a hard working student with a good application whose totally excited about pathology. But, I also have a husband and a kid that I'd like to spend some time with. I'd love to find a program that will help me become a terrific pathologist, while not scutting me out past 10pm.
desmangt said:Not to be a jerk, but this is the kinda crap that drives me insane. Why does everyone think pathology residency is going to be easy? In fact its probably one of the toughest residencies to complete. More path residents fail the boards every year than any other specialty. Just to be a minimally competent pathologist is still damn hard, let alone an expert. The lifestyle gets good after you have been trained and know what the hell you are doing. I find that there are two types of pathology residents: those who go into it thinking of lifestyle and those who really love it. The ones looking for an easy residency end up being piece of $$hit residents who can't diagnose crap and dump all of their work on the one's who really want to learn. You might have to work hard on AP rotations during the week, but weekends are usually free in path. Won't your kids be in school during the week anyway? If family time is that important, I suggest sucking it up and doing a three year AP only program at a top notch institution. Just get it over with. Half a$$ effort for 4 years at a small, low volume community program will give you nothing. You might graduate and get a job, but you won't have it for long after they realize you can't diagnose crap or kill someone.
I'm sorry if I came off harsh. Which I'll admit it reads that way. My comment wasn't really meant to be directed at you, but the "mind-set" of people looking for the most lifestyle accommadating residency program. The thing with pathology is that it is easier to match into (for now). However, it is very competitive to get into a good program. In my opinion, the number of quality pathology programs out there really suffers compared to other specialties. I've been told alot of this has to do with CP medicare cuts that happened in the 1980's, but I won't go into that here. Anyway, what I really wanted to express is that looking for a quality program, despite lifestyle factors, really should be the #1 priority in this process. The downside is that all quality programs require hard work from the residents. I have met residents who don't know anything and others whose diagnostic skills are mind blowing come from the same institution. Now since your issue is just needing to get home an hour or two early, I would say that busting your butt during the day should suffice. I was just warning that "lifestyle #1" as a priority may be catastrophic in the overall process of one becoming a pathologist. There are other lifestyle oriented fields of medicine that aren't as complicated as pathology. Pathology really isn't that lifestyle friendly other than the fact your weekends are usually free. Pathology is very difficult and requires a life long interest to be truly successful. You can come from Harvard Medical School but end up being incompetent in pathology at the end of the day. I hope you the best on this process, and again I appologize for sounding so harsh.Moochie said:When I first ready your post, I felt damn annoyed!![]()
But,... after re-reading my own post, I must reluctantly admit that I can at least partly understand what's gotten some of you all hot and bothered. That being said, it'd be nice to have been given the benefit of the doubt. In no way am I expecting an 8-5 type job during residency. In fact at this point during the process, the program I expect to rank #1 is considered to be one of the most rigorous in the country. But, I also don't think that the quality of training you receive is perfectly proportional to the hours spent at the hospital. It is more complex than that. And for me, the difference between getting home at 9 or 10 and getting home at 10 or 11 (on surg path) is significant-- it means I may get to tuck my little girl into bed at night. Also, at the path program where I am the residents do go in on most weekends during surg path. So, let's be clear-- I am NOT expecting an easy residency, I love pathology, and will make a great pathologist. Got it desmangt? 😎
Anyway, lesson learned. I will be much more careful about how I word my posts in the future-- don't want to get you guys all worked up again. 🙂
moochie