No relief

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Your experience in FM provides a different contextual framework than what we experience as EPs. First, we are not discussing patients in the waiting room; sign out refers to bedded patient seen by a provider and where care is being transitioned to another provider.

Patient’s sitting in waiting rooms are an entirely different beast. While I’d agree that the risk is less than for bedded patients, it’s still there. This is especially true for a provider who shuts down triage an hour early while a patient is on the hospital property (be sure to familiarize yourself with EMTALA’s definition of hospital property). A quick Google Search of “EMTALA” and “waiting roomswill yield plenty of instances where institutions ran afoul of their obligations when it came to the timely initiation of medical screening exams and waiting rooms. That provider had better make damn sure their are no unregistered patients in the parking lot, bathrooms, etc. Those CMS investigators are unlikely to look favorably on a physician who didn’t begin screening and stabilizing those patients for that 1hr they were supposed to be working.

To the point made by @GeneralVeers , there are occasional times when EPs will turnover departments at the end of shift with empty beds. I’d agree that such instances are far less risky than an EP leaving the ED uncovered with patients sitting in beds. However, such “high five” sign outs (empty department and waiting room) are uncommon even at smaller shops thanks to psych boarding.

Finally, there is nothing magical about signing onto patients in the EMR. I only mentioned it because plaintiff attorneys will sometimes cast a wide net and start their lawsuits by naming every EP who signed on to a patient as a care provider. They typically narrow the list of defendants as per their discovery. I was personally named (and quickly dropped) in a case where I had planned to see a patient and signed on in Epic, but a partner took it.
 
Last edited:
Your experience in FM provides a different contextual framework than what we experience as EPs. First, we are not discussing patients in the waiting room; sign out refers to bedded patient seen by provider and where care is being transitioned to another provider.

Patient’s sitting in waiting rooms are an entirely different beast. While I’d agree that the risk is less than for bedded patients, it’s still there. This is especially true for a provider who shuts down triage an hour early while a patient is on the hospital property (be sure to familiarize yourself with EMTALA’s definition of hospital property). A quick Google Search of EMTALA and waiting rooms will yield plenty of instances where institutions ran afoul of their obligations when it came to the timely initiation of medical screening exams and waiting rooms. That provider had better make damn sure their are no unregistered patients in the parking lot, bathrooms, etc. Those CMS investigators are unlikely to look favorably on a physician who didn’t begin screening and stabilizing those patients for that 1hr they were supposed to be working.

To the point made by @GeneralVeers , there are occasional times when EPs will turnover departments at the end of shift with empty beds. I’d agree that such instances are far less risky than an EP leaving the ED uncovered with patients sitting in beds. However, such “high five” sign outs (empty department and waiting room) are uncommon even at smaller shops thanks to psych boarding.
No one is arguing in this thread that you leave patients who are in a room in the ED.

As for EMTALA, one of the frequent posters here does some consulting for that sort of thing. He agreed with this post:

Let me pull a little bit of rank here. I have served as a medical director and chief of the medical staff at different institutions since likely before you were born. I have also served on my state medical board. I am familiar with the appropriate laws and regulations. Perhaps your career path has changed, but your user name suggest that you are not familiar with emergency medicine.

Rule #1: The senior attending physician in an ED has the right to shut down triage, or the ED, employee or not. That has been the case since there has been an "emergency room" and long before attending physicians as employees was even thought of. Do you want to make a guess the number of times in my career that I have shut down/gone on diversion during my career? Never once was I a hospital employee.

Diversions, if not common, are not rare in emergency medicine. Even those states that have implemented legislation to prevent diversions due to over-crowding have retained the ability for a facility to go on diversion for issues that effect the ability to provide patient care. In every institution that I am familiar with, the ability to make such a determination has been left in the hands of the senior attending physician present and in charge of the emergency department. No utilities? Sorry, we are closed (depending on the place). Confirmed case of Ebola? Shut down (again depends on the facility). Nurse's friend's kid had a case of diarrhea at school? Well, infection control wanted me to shut down. No qualified provider after 1200? Then we are shutting down.

It has been determined that the failure to provide care for a patient after a physician-patient relationship has been established is patient abandonment. However, it has also been established that there is no requirement to provide care for future patients; e.g., if a physician's contract expires on 1 July, he has no duty of care toward patients who might be referred after that date.

So, yes, a physician does have the ability and duty to refuse to accept patients if he is aware the facility will not be able to provide patient care after a certain time. Informed the generator is down (not rare at a small critical access place) and power will be out at 1400? Then you better not be accepting patients at 1300, even if it turns out the outage is cancelled.
 
Simple three step solution if you know about this ahead of time:

1) contact joint commission or whoever reviews the hospital about the impending problem.
2) ????
3) profit
 
As the Only Doc in the ER, you can not morally or professionally leave.

BUT whoever told you to leave without coverage just gave the worse advice I have read on here.

I call BS on this one.

You're contracted for a given period of time, not indefinite coverage. You work your contract and admin fails to ensure that coverage exists for future care at their facility and it's now YOUR PROBLEM? Nope. So I decided to stay and work and it goes on and on. At some point I'm an impaired physician (fatigue) and I'm still required to work? While impaired? Nope. It's lawyer time. I'm going to the board for their unprofessional behavior, the hospital accrediting body for "disruptive physician" and lawyering for breach of contract. F-that.
 
But in this case there is no "sign out". There is simply a patient showing up in the lobby after our scheduled duty hours have elapsed. There is no patient abandonment, because their is no affirmative initiation of a patient relationship, and no sign out from another doctor.
What about the other 20 pts still in the ER? Other than some low volume BFE place, I have never had an empty ER in a typical ER.
 
3 hours late leaving? "Signed out to Dr. Colleague pending final results and disposition."

I am one of the most efficient docs in my group. I prob leave 75% of the time when the next guy shows up while most stay 1hr finishing up. I do my prep to leave work 1-2 hrs before the next guy comes.

But in 18 yrs, I did have a day that I stayed 3 hrs late for an LP not including waiting for labs. Nurse takes 1 hr to draw labs. 1 hr to get labs back, 30 min to get me my tray.

ER crap happens.
 
I call BS on this one.

You're contracted for a given period of time, not indefinite coverage. You work your contract and admin fails to ensure that coverage exists for future care at their facility and it's now YOUR PROBLEM? Nope. So I decided to stay and work and it goes on and on. At some point I'm an impaired physician (fatigue) and I'm still required to work? While impaired? Nope. It's lawyer time. I'm going to the board for their unprofessional behavior, the hospital accrediting body for "disruptive physician" and lawyering for breach of contract. F-that.

Again, I am not taking this situation to an extreme situation. But for anyone to leave right when your shift ends b/c there is no one coming then you are taking a big risk that I would take off medical staff when I was in MEC.

Crap happens in medicine. You stick it out and do what is appropriate. Call admin, after 2-3 hrs, someone will show up b/c the CMG will not want issues with admin.

No one is expecting you to stay 12 hrs past your shift.

There are time when your partner oversleeps, forgets they are scheduled and out of town, etc. It happens and all of us have seen it. The doc working sticks it out until someone can come. May take 30 min, may take 3 hrs. But Noone is expecting you to take this situation to the extreme.

But for me, I would stick it out until admin/CMG figures out that it is affecting their bottom line. If I start to get tired, Then I am diverting all EMS and only caring for critical patients. I am consulting all specialists/hospitalists to care for sick patients.

I will revert to being a mass casualty ER doc which would make CMG/Admin very uncomfortable.

1. Sick pts - Pan labs and immediately call the hospitalist to admit
2. Not sick pts - MSE and go home
3. Divert all ER transfers and EMS.
 
No one is arguing in this thread that you leave patients who are in a room in the ED.

Actually, they are. As both @emergentmd and I have been saying, emergency departments are almost always occupied with bedded patients. Thus, anytime a EP abandons an ED without coverage they are almost always abandoning actual patients unless they have arranged proper handoff to a hospitalist or some other suitable provider.

As for forum members who begin posts by pulling internet “rank” or list “rules” that don’t actually exist, oh well...
 
Actually, they are. As both @emergentmd and I have been saying, emergency departments are almost always occupied with bedded patients. Thus, anytime a EP abandons an ED without coverage they are almost always abandoning actual patients unless they have arranged proper handoff to a hospitalist or some other suitable provider.

As for forum members who begin posts by pulling internet “rank” or list “rules” that don’t actually exist, oh well...
Really?

Really? That seems rather harsh. I haven't been in this situation, but I think I would inform the charge nurse and hospital admin that I would stay to dispo all my remaining patients, but would not pick up any new patients. I'd advise them to stop accepting ambulances and inform walk-ins that there is no doctor on duty (presumably most patients would decide to leave at that point).

I would argue that there's no abandonment once you've dispo'd a patient, and that merely being present in the ED does not constitute a patient-physician relationship, and hence there's no duty to see new patients. Similarly, if I walked through the ED on my day off to go to a meeting, I'm not available for patient care.
Correct. No court in the land would force you to work for free as an indentured services. At 7AM I would immediately stop seeing any new patients, dispo or discharge any that were remaining, and walk out the door.
 

Yeah, really...

So the current physician is essentially a slave until another physician relieves them? That doesn't make sense. So if the CEO decides they don't want to pay for coverage for 3 days, the OP is responsible? No way.

That's the medical director and CEOs problem, not the problem of the employee who is being paid a set amount to work a set number of hours.

"I am leaving at the end of my shift as contractually obligated and you have to get coverage for YOUR patients in YOUR ED"

This is supposed to be the benefit of being an employee/IC. We have no ownership and no long term skin in the game.

I know - crazy talk, right?

That post was liked by several forum members. To be fair, a couple of people made similar posts but later clarified that they would stay after their shift to mop up. I’ve acknowledged that and said it’s a great idea.

Just so we are clear, my position is that some people may be venting on the internet but the majority of doctors are going to do the right thing and make sure their patients are well cared for before leaving. I‘M LITERALLY CALLING YOU A GOOD DOCTOR. Why you want to debate that point is beyond me but I suspect that it has something to do with the inherent limitations of internet communication.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, really...



I know - crazy talk, right?

That post was liked by several forum members. To be fair, a couple of people made similar posts but later clarified that they would stay after their shift to mop up. I’ve acknowledged that and said it’s a great idea.

Just so we are clear, my position is that some people may be venting on the internet but the majority of doctors are going to do the right thing and make sure their patients are well cared for before leaving. I‘M LITERALLY CALLING YOU A GOOD DOCTOR. Why you want to debate that point is beyond me but I suspect that it has something to do with the inherent limitations of internet communication.
No one in real life if walking out of an ED full with patients. Both because it's wrong and because you will be auto-terminated by the cmg if not lose med staff privileges and possible licensure. Then you are toast for good.

I like emergents approach. Pan labs, auto admit the real pts. MSE and street the fake ones. Hammer page CMO, CEO, CMG. After an hour of that not working call fox and friends.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using SDN mobile
 
This thread is really getting out of hand, there is massive amount of arguing going back and forth about a scenario that is about as common as winning the lottery. I can't even keep track of the arguments anymore
 
This thread is really getting out of hand, there is massive amount of arguing going back and forth about a scenario that is about as common as winning the lottery. I can't even keep track of the arguments anymore

Very true. I've stayed a few hours late (and been paid for it). Never played the hostage game or been played in it. However, we've all "heard about someone" where the CMG/locums/hospital failed to arrange for the next shift to be covered and then abused the physician currently on shift to stay for another shift. Not sure if that has ever really happened, but it's clear that there is a spectrum of issues. Being used by the system with false threats against one's license warrant a full fight, an hour or two late due to life happening (flight delayed, doc overslept, crashed a car on the way to work, etc.) - no big deal.
 
Top