- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is it just me or does every other book define it differently?
FA 2009 has it synonymous with communicating hydrocephalus. HY Neuro has it as a separate entity from communicating, but using what I understood as the definition of communicating hydrocephalus (impaired absorption of CSF by the arachnoid villi). Goljan gives the most common cause as idiopathic, and just defines it as dilated ventricles with normal CSF pressure.
Who is correct? Will the real normal pressure hydrocephalus please stand up?
FA 2009 has it synonymous with communicating hydrocephalus. HY Neuro has it as a separate entity from communicating, but using what I understood as the definition of communicating hydrocephalus (impaired absorption of CSF by the arachnoid villi). Goljan gives the most common cause as idiopathic, and just defines it as dilated ventricles with normal CSF pressure.
Who is correct? Will the real normal pressure hydrocephalus please stand up?