Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Where did I reject what the cold climate experts said? I simply stated what I directly observed during the storm; that the roads weren't the problem.The boy might be a victim simply due to his age, if this person was older who the hell sits around and freezes to death? You on the other hand come across as an arrogant Texan. You don't live in a cold climate but reject what others who do say. All I know is my homes were a nice 68 degrees inside even when it was -23 outside. If the power went out I would still be toasty.
Thank you. While I think Ted Cruz is a clown, he's not wrong. Some Texans would prefer that, but I think most people see the need for balance and realize that some regulation is necessary. I think it's also worth mentioning that the vast majority of Texans had no idea what regulated vs deregulated really meant prior to the storm. Even people who did know, thought the competition was saving them money and had no idea the potential consequences.Your point is well-taken, at least by me, but wasn't it Ted Cruz who said Texans would prefer to go without power than accept any government regulations?
I agree, those people are responsible for choosing those plans. I actually know a handful of people who were Griddy customers and they understood perfectly how it worked, they just never imagined the kind of price spike that they got slapped with. They also don't feel like the company took advantage of them as seems to be the national narrative.I am torn. It is objectively awful to charge exuberate rates during an emergency. But Texas is all about personal responsibility, right? Those customers didn't have to choose a wholesale variety-rate plan. That was the risk they choose when they picked that plan. They wanted the lower rates and they choose the risk of spikes when they did that. That's the problem with giving people choices - they choose wrong and then want to be bailed out.
But price-gouging is still price gouging. I mean who could predict over a 1000% increase in rates? Those wholesale rates should never have been allowed to begin with. Raising the prices didn't increase supply, after all, the suppliers didn't need additional motivation to increase supply. It was entirely a production issue, not a demand issue.
My understanding is that the wholesale price was allowed to "increase per demand" in order to incentivize more producers to come online. I'm obviously not in the power generation business but it sounds like there is some breakeven point where it wasn't profitable for some plants to run due to the extreme cold. Because it's a competitive model, if it's not economical for them to generate power, no one will make them. So they cranked the price up to lure in more producers, then there were gas supply issues out of the Permian and it really hit the fan. So in a sense, the Griddy customers that had power got caught in the cross-fire.