Did anyone see the NRMP Regional Results posted for today? Could someone post the data for PM&R spots and combined peds/PM&R spots?
This info is "public," so to speak, in that all applicants can see this information. The individual information regarding which programs have open positions is NOT public and won't be available until tomorrow anyway, and that's only for those who did not match.
PGY-1 Positions:
PM&R: Total: 83. Unmatched: 3. (all three in the Southern region).
PGY-2 Positions:
PM&R: Total: 287. Unmatched: 12. (8 in the Central, 4 in the Northeast).
Peds/PM&R: Total: 4. Unmatched: 2. (1 in the Central, 1 in the Northeast).
-savealife
I know this is speculation, but isn't there only 2 PGY-1 programs in the south.. San Antonio and LSU? I'm just curious if there are more.
There's also U of Arkansas.
According to their website its three PGY1 and one PG2. This is a link to their websiteah.. how many spots do they have.. just curious..
According to their website its three PGY1 and one PG2. This is a link to their website
http://www.uams.edu/pmr/residents/program/ I f you click on FAQ you'll get your questions answered.
Also, you can research other programs via FREIDA's website. The link is below
http://www.ama-assn.org/vapp/freida/srch/1,1239,Y,00.html
Good luck!
PGY1 spots? are they considered "South"?Uk has 3 PGY1 spots as well
I have heard UK, Arkansas, Downstate, Wash U, Wisconsin, MCW, Wayne State, Sinai, and Schwab, but that is just 2nd handWhich programs didn't fill? Anyone want to divulge this info?
I have heard UK, Arkansas, Downstate, Wash U, Wisconsin, MCOW, Wayne State, Sinai, and Schwab, but that is just 2nd hand
That is what i heard.
Schwab suprised me
96% of positions filled. That's a lot.
What programs do this on a consistent basis?Consideration to take into account regarding the unfilled spots- some program for reasons I doesn't completely understand/ or that justifiably makes actual sense-- they will keep out one of two spots from matching. They'll say that they'd rather limit their rank list and filled with whom they really want than get some that may be a bit satifactory for their taste. this tactic of a short ROL will give a spot "unmatched" and they the PD can "handpick their candidate" since it's in the scramble. Notoriously programs go year after year with spots such as this. I don't really this this tactic is fair to the whole match process as its supposed intention, however it the "the match" and anything can happen.
good luck to all in the process- don't forget to post, let us know were you are going.![]()
What programs do this on a consistent basis?
I agree. I have heard of this myself. I think programs should rank all acceptable candidates that they interview. Of course, if they interview and don't find the candidate suitable that is one thing, but you can't tell me that out of all of those people they interview, that they can't find enough good candidates?I don't know the answer regarding which programs consistently leave a slot open. However, about 4 years ago I tried to help a physician who was participating in the match to scramble into PMR. Interestingly enough, a few of the names on the current list match those of 4 years ago. I distinctly remember that Wash U and MCOW each had a slot available, and that they were not interested in the physician I was trying to help. I had always assumed that program directors would be desperate to fill all of their slots, and would be anxious to talk with prospective candidates (or their "sponsors") to ascertain who would be the best fit for their programs from the candidates left available. I therefore found it strange that these programs almost seemed "leisurely" in their conversations, as though they weren't worried at all about the outcome of filling their remaining slot. Looking back, it is almost as if...they knew they weren't going to fill the slot!
Hmmmmm.
PS: I think I saved a copy of the unfilled match list from 4 years ago. I will share it with the rest of y'all if/when I find it.
Schwab is a bit surprising...the rest of the list traditionally have difficulty in filling all spots if memory over the last few years is correct.
I have heard UK, Arkansas, Downstate, Wash U, Wisconsin, MCOW, Wayne State, Sinai, and Schwab, but that is just 2nd hand
Personally, I interviewed at Schwab, and other than the strong PD and some of the faculty, I was not impressed. But, they are in Chicago. Maybe they were just too particular in who they ranked, and didn't rank enough people. This is just my personal opinion, and I am sure Schwab would be great for others.
With the exception of Schwab and Sinai Baltimore, these programs are usually the ones that are unfilled. SUNY Downstate is under the ortho department and Wash U in St. Louis is under the neurology department. That is probably what makes those two programs less desirable. Sometimes, the program directors also rank too few applicants which causes spots to go unmatched.I have heard UK, Arkansas, Downstate, Wash U, Wisconsin, MCOW, Wayne State, Sinai, and Schwab, but that is just 2nd hand
I am not sure that is fair to either Sinai or WisconsinSchwab is a bit surprising...the rest of the list traditionally have difficulty in filling all spots if memory over the last few years is correct.
I am not sure that is fair to either Sinai or Wisconsin
This is the first year I have ever seen Wisconsin on the list (as opposed to MCW, which, as you say, had its difficulties until Dr. Dillingham arrived)UW has had some similar problems.
I am not sure that is fair to either Sinai or Wisconsin
Wow...almost 2300 views in one week. And they say no one reads SDN...![]()
... I distinctly remember that Wash U and MCOW each had a slot available, and that they were not interested in the physician I was trying to help. I had always assumed that program directors would be desperate to fill all of their slots, and would be anxious to talk with prospective candidates (or their "sponsors") to ascertain who would be the best fit for their programs from the candidates left available. I therefore found it strange that these programs almost seemed "leisurely" in their conversations, as though they weren't worried at all about the outcome of filling their remaining slot.
You'd think PM&R Departments would be happy to collect the funding for the slot from GME.😕
Lol that's why I put in 'if memory serves' caveat.