Hi Everyone,
I am a current M1 at NOVA, and I must agree with KateWL's comments regarding Renal. I want to give all the incoming M1s a "heads-up" as to what went on.
The renal/endocrine professor passed away near the beginning of the semester, soon after teaching us the nervous system. So, the physio department hires Dr. Lyons to teach us – he used to be the chair of the physio department, but now teaches at FIU (or FAU). Now, they hire this guy to teach us renal phys, when the department already has professors that teach renal phys to other divisions (dental, optometry, etc). On top of that, they hire someone who has been known in the past (when he taught here) to give impossible exams where the averages were way below passing (around 50 or 60!!)
From the start it seemed that his teaching was quite good. He explained concepts well, and was an overall good professor. However, while studying his packet after he has left the school (we had already started a new topic in physio) it was quite amazing all the mistakes me and my classmates found. Arrows pointing up that should be down, contradictions everywhere (on a diagram he clearly shows that urea is secreted at a specific site, but in his text a few paragraphs later he says it is absorbed...) Now, he noticed during class the numerous mistakes that he had, and corrected a fraction of them - but we ended up having to take an exam with notes that were unclear and confusing.
People turned to reading the Vander "Renal Physiology" mini-book and the assigned text from the class – and appeared to be confident with the materal. And then, the test came...
It was amazing at all the questions that either had no correct answer, or more likely (5 or 6 questions) – more than one correct answer VERBATIM from his notes. We were even asked questions on the contradictions in the packet.
We are not allowed to ask questions during exams, so that was a big problem for our sanity.. Lyons left the school after the exam, and is nowhere to be found. Big surprise – average on the test was a 64, and now about 30 people in the class are failing physiology. The current chair of the department refuses to curve the exam (despite the pleas of students and faculty), and says it might be curved at the end of the year depending on the average.
Many now say that is an unlikely thing, since students have been going to his office and complaining. He is quite mad at our class for complaining (like we have no rights to talk about a completely unfair examination)
The facts: We had a bad packet and a completely unfair test by anyone's standards, and no action has been taken. Most of the master's students who got A's and high B's ont he exam last year failed or just barely passed. Students who had 90's and above on all 3 previous exams now got in the 60s. Doesn't that show that there is something wrong with the exam? NOT the students taking it (which the current chair in convinced of). The administration seems to be doing nothing to remedy this. We have so many students in the class barely passing – and although we have two exams left (we had respiratory today, which was difficult, but at least "fair") – nobody seems to realize the position this puts people in. It creates unneccessary stress in those that are in danger of repeating the year.
Simply stated, a great injustice has been done to the class of 2005, and although the school prides itself on students and their say in everything, this tragedy to our class is falling on deaf ears.
Now, there are rumors around that they are trying to weed us out because of our class size, and the administration has of course denied everything – yet, it is quite clear this may be the truth: They willingly hire a professor known to give tsts that fail a majority of the class, and although these exams were curved in the past, they refuse to do so for us. Something just does NOT seem right here.
Just wanted all the incoming M1s to know of our situation, and be aware that you and your class might not have that big a "voice" as you would like. In your first semester, demand to the powers that be that you don't have Dr. Lyons, or your class might too suffer unjust treatment by the school, and have no power whatsoever to combat this wrong done to us all.
Good Luck to you all, and pray for those of use who were willingly failed!