- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Messages
- 6,005
- Reaction score
- 4,357
In that case, we can use a 3+3+2 model for FM docs...There's just too much knowledge for the old one year model to work well nowadays, regardless of what midlevels would have people think.
In that case, we can use a 3+3+2 model for FM docs...There's just too much knowledge for the old one year model to work well nowadays, regardless of what midlevels would have people think.
Locking people into an 8 year path before starting medical school doesn't seem like a good way of going about things, IMO.In that case, we can use a 3+3+2 model for FM docs...
In that case, we can use a 3+3+2 model for FM docs...
Locking people into an 8 year path before starting medical school doesn't seem like a good way of going about things, IMO.
In my world, its cardiologists and nephrologists doing interventional procedures in realms they have no business being in. I don't particularly care that they are doing it, but when their complication rates are higher and they burn bridges for us down the road, I do have a problem with it.
Whoa. Don't mean to derail thread but what are nephrologists doing that could burn bridges for vascular surgery? I mean I understand a brazen interventional cardiologists doing a full metal jacket in lower extremity ruining future bypass... but what exactly is a nephrologist doing?
Placing stents in places they should not be placing them. Poorly accessing vessels and stenosing them with closure devices. I mean those are examples from today... I could probably write a book...
What makes you think FM is something so low level and easy?or just realize the physicians are by nature going to be overqualified for FM instead of not only trying to pigeonhole 18 yr olds into medicine, trying to pigeonhole them into one speciality.
What makes you think FM is something so low level and easy?
They are doing angiography?? Like renal angio and stenting? And/or lower extremities? Sounds crazy.
What makes you think FM is something so low level and easy?