- Joined
- Jan 30, 2011
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 0
Do nurses consider themselves a doctors equal? Or do they know their place?
Do nurses consider themselves a doctors equal? Or do they know their place?
"They know their place" is a pretty crude and disrespectful way to say it
Yes...
At any rate, the AANA is pushing equivalence in care between NP/MD pretty hard, but that isn't necessarily representative of many nurses. Similar to APA rx movement and many clinical psychologists.
The AANA can push as much as they want. They'll never get the respect that the title of physician carries. Additionally, I doubt very much that anyone bleeding out is going to be asking for an NP.
Respect isn't really what matters, at least in the sense I think you're using it. Scope of practice + ability to practice without malpractice that outpaces salary + ability to attract patients (the last of which only loosely being related to "respect"). IMO, only way to stop midlevel creep is through legislation - same way they're expanding. To what degree APN should be stopped, I don't know - haven't been both a physician and NP and the equivalency literature out there is pretty lame by and large.
What exactly is your purpose in making this thread? Trollish title, inflammatory one liner body.
Perhaps for you, but I know a handful of people who prefer NPs (or in your case PNPs) to MDs. They think that having been a nurse and getting to care for patients for a longer period of time before learning all of the diagnostics makes for a better practitioner than someone who knows more science but is seen by them to be less compassionate than someone whose job it was day in and day out to make patients feel better in other ways than the medical sense.Respect
You're at a dinner party and are introduced to a pediatric surgeon and a pediatric np. Who are you going to be more interested in talking to? For me the answer is easy.
Respect
You're at a dinner party and are introduced to a pediatric surgeon and a pediatric np. Who are you going to be more interested in talking to? For me the answer is easy.
Wu - NP scope is regulated by state. Some can practice independently.
Perhaps for you, but I know a handful of people who prefer NPs (or in your case PNPs) to MDs. They think that having been a nurse and getting to care for patients for a longer period of time before learning all of the diagnostics makes for a better practitioner than someone who knows more science but is seen by them to be less compassionate than someone whose job it was day in and day out to make patients feel better in other ways than the medical sense.
Sure, they might not have all of the sciences an MD has, but in most FP or Peds everyday situations, that level is not necessary and NPs practice under an MD so if it were necessary, the MD can step in.
Perhaps for you, but I know a handful of people who prefer NPs (or in your case PNPs) to MDs. They think that having been a nurse and getting to care for patients for a longer period of time before learning all of the diagnostics makes for a better practitioner than someone who knows more science but is seen by them to be less compassionate than someone whose job it was day in and day out to make patients feel better in other ways than the medical sense.
Sure, they might not have all of the sciences an MD has, but in most FP or Peds everyday situations, that level is not necessary and NPs practice under an MD so if it were necessary, the MD can step in.
Do people prefer NPs? Yes. People also prefer double cheeseburgers with bacon and extra fries. I agree that everyone wants to be comfortable going to the doctor, but should what the patient wants be the only consideration for medical care? The solution to a truly screwed up system of medical care should not be lowering the standards so patients have more time with the health professional.
The real question is how are people best served for medical care. Sometimes it's not important on an individual basis that you never see a doctor. Other times it can lead to furthering antibiotic resistance or a missed diagnosis.
And I've never met a NP who didn't want to be called Dr. That's part of the problem.
Oh! I was not aware of this fact! Good to know.
Does this mean that they don't even have to be under an MD/DO's supervision indirectly? In the states I'm familiar with, they have to be supervised by MDs but I was never sure if this was directly or indirectly (as in the MD does not have to be onsite when they are)
Also, an aside, how do you address an NP? By first name as you would a nurse?
Also doctors who have their own practices clearly state M.D. after their name. All else being equal if my son comes down with a cold and I want to take him to the doc and I see two practices:
Jeff Frank, Pediatrician, M.D.
Judy Wiseman, NP of Pediatrics
Who am I going to?
Also doctors who have their own practices clearly state M.D. after their name. All else being equal if my son comes down with a cold and I want to take him to the doc and I see two practices:
Jeff Frank, Pediatrician, M.D.
Judy Wiseman, NP of Pediatrics
Who am I going to?
Since when do people prefer NPs? I have NEVERRRRR heard any of my friends or family tell me they are going to go to the hospital to be examined by an NP.
http://www.acnpweb.org/files/public/UCSF_Chart_2007.pdf
Good summary on page 3. Completely autonomously to answer your question though.
Mr. / Ms. NP's first name or last name, depending on how they introduce themselves. As far as DNP's... I have no qualms calling someone a non-physician doctorate holder doctor so-and-so in a clinical setting, as long as provider role is clear. If and how that latter part actually happens in theory/practice, I couldn't say, but I think that's really the point of contention in previously proposed legislation holding that only MD/DO's are referred to as doctors in clinical settings (wasn't passed).
Also doctors who have their own practices clearly state M.D. after their name. All else being equal if my son comes down with a cold and I want to take him to the doc and I see two practices:
Jeff Frank, Pediatrician, M.D.
Judy Wiseman, NP of Pediatrics
Who am I going to?
So what if someone that seems a group prefers an allied health practitioner to the doctor in the practice? Oh God, the horror.Since when do people prefer NPs? I have NEVERRRRR heard any of my friends or family tell me they are going to go to the hospital to be examined by an NP.
Also, an aside, how do you address an NP? By first name as you would a nurse?
The nicer one.Respect
You're at a dinner party and are introduced to a pediatric surgeon and a pediatric np. Who are you going to be more interested in talking to? For me the answer is easy.
you have the power to make this rightI don't even know why I'm responding to you, though. I'm sure you're trolling.
I don't even know why I'm responding to you, though. I'm sure you're trolling.
you have the power to make this right
Well this is actually a great opportunity, given that you're a mod. I've been keeping an eye on this turd farmer and his overwhelming number of threads started. They were merely inane to start, but are getting progressively more offensive.
Poise ban hammer.
edit: lol @ probationary status
Also doctors who have their own practices clearly state M.D. after their name. All else being equal if my son comes down with a cold and I want to take him to the doc and I see two practices:
Jeff Frank, Pediatrician, M.D.
Judy Wiseman, NP of Pediatrics
Who am I going to?
Considering that neither one can do anything for a cold, it doesn't really matter.
Respect
You're at a dinner party and are introduced to a pediatric surgeon and a pediatric np. Who are you going to be more interested in talking to? For me the answer is easy.
Example: nurses are expected to follow a doctor's order and diagnosis, however if the nurse sees that the diagnosis is misplaced they are also expected to talk with the doctor.
Nurses see themselves as patient advocates, and will make sure to let the doctor know that.
also, it tends the be the older nurses who are uppity and carry a chip on their shoulder, similar to how some old docs can be hard-asses and annoying. The younger generation of both are less disgruntled and both groups more pleasant to be around (with many exceptions)
assuming they are female, the one who is hotter (srs)
The cuter one...! 😉
The nicer one.![]()
also, it tends the be the older nurses who are uppity and carry a chip on their shoulder, similar to how some old docs can be hard-asses and annoying. The younger generation of both are less disgruntled and both groups more pleasant to be around (with many exceptions)
I'd also like to see the trends separated by gender...I've heard more about murses with stuff to prove than older ladies but I've always found these stories a little suspect.
Weak troll gets served.
Nice job you two.
If you're correct in thinking that the OP is trolling, the only "serving" being done on this thread is by the OP because he got your attention. Now, be quiet and let interesting threads continue.
If you're correct in thinking that the OP is trolling, the only "serving" being done on this thread is by the OP because he got your attention. Now, be quiet and let interesting threads continue.
...fail
Happens all the time. NPs usually spend more time with patients, which is often the one thing the patient really notices.Since when do people prefer NPs? I have NEVERRRRR heard any of my friends or family tell me they are going to go to the hospital to be examined by an NP.
but this isn't an interesting thread...AND getting someone's attention isn't "serving" someone fyi
if it wasn't an interesting thread, you wouldn't be coming back to it. and yes, when it comes to trolling, the entire point is to get a response! Duh! U mad?