- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,381
- Reaction score
- 4,529
Vent, brag, tell us how your school had 100% pass rate, celebrate, let someone else talk you off the ledge...
This will be fun. Unless it's not.
This will be fun. Unless it's not.
I agree, I feel for anyone that had to do it on the 19th. I know of some who had local interviews on the 18th and boards on the 19th. You would probably be exhausted after CRIP and any local interviews you had, plus when it comes down to it while the material is somewhat the same interviews are so much more trauma and classification based and require a completely different method of studying in my opinion.Frankly I would not have wanted to take boards after CRIP. It's a tough spot to be put in by Mother Nature.
Is this confirmed for 2014, if so how does that compare to 2013? I don't recall what the first time pass rate was last year.The national pass rate for first time test takers is 88%
Well this definitely won't help to alleviate the shortage.... Brace for a very large # unmatched come March 20th IMHO. I wouldn't necessarily says it puts previous graduates at a disadvantage, keep in mind some of the unmatched have spent the year gaining experience which some programs may value. If I was faced with two similar academic status student and one had a year of experience I know who I would pick personally...Dammmmmnnn. I really thought the podiatry Gods were going to stick it to us to alleviate the shortage. This makes it even harder for the unmatched from previous years IMHO.
Well this definitely won't help to alleviate the shortage....
I wouldn't necessarily says it puts previous graduates at a disadvantage...
that there ought to be a seat for every graduating student.
But even with a million residency positions, there would be "qualified" individuals who wouldn't get a program
All very valid points and I agree but as you said it is a stigma and does not apply to all. I can see how it would be difficult to overcome those perceptions, a previous grad must work much harder just to compensate for these types of questions...True but an unmatched student comes with a stigma as well. Whether it's justified or not. Sure this unmatched has gained experience but why did they go unmatched in the first place? Personality? Work ethic? Unprepared? Sure, this unmatched has done good in his/her year off but will history repeat itself if I hire this person? Those are the questions rolling around in my head if I'm the director making the decision. I think gaining a year of experience does not clearly distinguish one student from another. But that's my opinion.
The first time pass rate really has no bearing on the shortage. 6% of re-takers could pass, leaving a 94% pass rate and around 40 more seats than there would be class of 2014 grads. Or 10% could pass and the class of 2014 would be a wash, meaning the problem isn't compounding but there are still a combination of just over 50 kids from 2013 and 2014 who are "qualified" and don't get a spot.
It is really pointless to assume anything at this point.
It absolutely puts them at a disadvantage at a huge majority of programs across the country for all the reasons ankle breaker mentioned.
While it probably isn't productive, and certainly not indicative of the unmatched population as a whole, I did run across an unmatched student this year. I had a classmate who did as well. Our experiences were very similar and it was blatantly obvious why they did not get a program. It reaffirmed what I've always believed: that there ought to be a seat for every graduating student. But even with a million residency positions, there would be "qualified" individuals who wouldn't get a program
The first time pass rate really has no bearing on the shortage. 6% of re-takers could pass, leaving a 94% pass rate and around 40 more seats than there would be class of 2014 grads. Or 10% could pass and the class of 2014 would be a wash, meaning the problem isn't compounding but there are still a combination of just over 50 kids from 2013 and 2014 who are "qualified" and don't get a spot.
It is really pointless to assume anything at this point.
I 100% agree with this. No evaluations can be made until 2nd go around.
First time pass rate class of 2012 was 82%, class of 2013 84%, class of 2014 88%. Trend.And I should clarify. I misspoke and meant if retakers increased the overall rate by 6%. Not if 6% of them pass. Looks like everyone got what I meant.
Two things. Pass rates have not "historically been trending up". They are actually remarkably consistent, or have been in the past. Last years practically 99% pass rate was an anomaly. There is no trend...yet. There could be, but your statement about some upward trend isn't true. Also, stereotypes exist for a reason. Prior to last year and a handful of the 2013'ers didn't get spots for very obvious reasons. So much so that the stigma/stereotype has sunk in very deeply amongst residency programs, in my experience. It may not be "fair" but I don't blame them for being cautious. After a year or two of re-applicants coming through and performing well, though, the perception will change. If they come trough and perform well...
First time pass rate class of 2012 was 82%, class of 2013 84%, class of 2014 88%. Trend.
For every one of these threads, the national average is always 86% (or mid to high 80's) and every school is always like 4-6 points higher.
it don't make no sense.
does the national average include people retaking it or not? i think most schools state a certain percent pass rate on just a certain academic class year.For every one of these threads, the national average is always 86% (or mid to high 80's) and every school is always like 4-6 points higher.
it don't make no sense.
Seems to me that boards with a 99% pass rate do little to show the MD or DO community that we deserve equality. While I realize it is a competence exam, in my opinion it looks bad,
Not sure what you mean by this when first time pass rate for USMLE Step 1-3 hover around the 95-99%.