ochem - IUPAC naming Q

Started by 123321
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

123321

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
do i have this right:

when naming a molec based on IUPAC, you want the MOST # of substituents in your chain, but the LEAST number of "numbers"/you want your number count to be as low as possible?

does that make sense/is that the rule?
 
do i have this right:

when naming a molec based on IUPAC, you want the MOST # of substituents in your chain, but the LEAST number of "numbers"/you want your number count to be as low as possible?

does that make sense/is that the rule?

Yes. You are looking for the longest chain with a largest number of substituents. When numbering substituents, one must chose the lowest possible numbers.

cleardot.gif