***Official 2006 Step 1 Results Thread***

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

AwesomeO-DO

robot voice]I am AwesomeO
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
309
Reaction score
0
I may not be the first to take Step one in 2006, but I gotta be close, so I declare the 2006 Step 1 forum OPEN. It may lay dormant for some time, but some day the class of 2008 will thank me for getting things ready for them. Don't worry, I set the bar pretty low. How low you ask? well.... less than 240 and more than 182. All I care is that I don't have to take that damn test again. They say then next few are easier. We'll see........
 
Tested May 20th, finally got my freaking scores today (nearly 8 wks later):

265/99

Someone asked about the mean:
Mean: 217; SD; 23

*Qbank %: 85% (one time through, finished 90%, did in blocks by subject after reviewing)
*Also did ~90% of Qbook and Robbins Question Book. Didn't keep track of my % correct on these questions though.
*NBME forms: didn't do these
*Sources: First Aid, BRS for Path and Phys, ridiculously simple for Micro, Boards and Wards for Pharm, High-yield for Neuro, Anatomy, embryology, immuno, behavioral and biochem.
 
I was reaching for an unrealistic 265, but i got a 249 🙂 which I'm very happy with.

Q bank average was about 72%
Highest NBME: 580
MCAT: 1st try 28, 2nd try 37
 
273

You know, above 250 it doesn't really matter in terms of residency or whatever. And above 260 it's probably mostly an element of lucky guessing, so I wouldn't put too much weight into the score - above 260 it's essentially all the same. But for those of you who are curious, here are my random "pontifications" on preparing:

...for a description of my exam experience please see this thread:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=291773

1) Use the NBME tests for four purposes:
a) Gauge your performance
b) Learn how they ask questions
c) Learn what level of detail is required
d) Know what concepts they like - then research every question you are unsure of.

2) Goljan is the single best source out there, bar none. His 37 hours of audio and his Rapid Review Pathology book are brilliant. Start early! There are so many nuggets in there that it will take several times through the audio and book to absorb them all. And beyond the USMLE, I noticed that when the surgery residents ask me questions, I have heard many of the answers straight out of Goljan's mouth. He may be schizophrenic or whatever, but he explains things with an incredible clarity.

3) QBank is overpriced, overrated, outdated, and actually counterproductive. About 1/3 of the QBank questions are good. The rest are a complete waste of time, requiring a level of clinicallly-irrelevant minutia that is NOT indicative of the real test.

4) For those of you who have not yet started second year, make your own notes. It's so much easier to breeze through a 20-page summary of each exam instead of trying to make your way through a binder full of powerpoint printouts. No matter what school you go to, your second-year lectures are given by clinicians and pathologists - the same people that make the USMLE questions.

5) I studied one month "pure" (no classes), but I also started studying seriously after spring break 2nd year, so I studied about 3 or 4 months "dirty" (with classes going on).

6) Review when appropriate. The day before you start cardiac pathophysiology second year, spend some time reviewing cardiac physiology from first year. If you do this for every block, you will have reviewed mostly everything except for biochem and anatomy by the time boards rolls around.

7) Have fun! Like I said before, above 250 makes no difference for residency. You should study because it's fun, because you're finally piecing things together and learning things all the way through.

THE SOURCES: (aside from Goljan, who is far above all the others)

- Robbins Review Path Questions. 1200 Outstanding questions. I did all of them except for the "final exam" at the end. I highlighted all the answers that said something important, then reread my highlights after I finished the book. Great explanations, and the questions are pretty difficult.

- First Aid. Not such the bomb that everyone says it is, but a great source nonetheless. The main problem I thought was that it told me stuff that I either knew or couldn't decipher if I didn't. Some sections have too much detail (i.e. leukemias M1 through M7, and embryology of the genital tubercle), and some sections are of course too shallow (path). Generally very good, especially behavioral, pharm, phys (short but has most of the important graphs). I didn't read this seriously until 2 weeks before the test, and in the last day of study read the entire book once over for review.

- All of Dudek's HY books (Histo, CMB, Embryology, Anatomy). Just pick and choose here. There's way more detail than you need in any of these books, but the pictures are nice and they are good to skim as a review. If I had to pick one I'd go with HY histo, which as I've posted before is really a "Sleeper" - there's a lot of juicy stuff hiding behind its unfortunate title. Don't spend more than half a day on anatomy unless you don't know what the brachial plexus is. The embryology book is good for the nice chapters on menstrual cycle, pregnancy, fertilization, and chromosomal splitting (meiosis).

- Katzung pharmacology. THE BIG ONE. No, of course, I didn't read it. But I did spend half a day reading the caption to every illustration - many on the test were very similar.

- MAKE YOUR OWN NOTES. In addition to everything above, I relearned all my own notes (which were my primary sources for Micro, Neuro, and Pharm).

- BSS (Board Simulator Series). I posted on this earlier, do a search. Outdated, so don't take it too seriously, or get offended if you score 60%. The pathophysiology questions with lots of arrows going every which way were extremely helpful.

- Kaplan biochem. This is the one thing I've seen from Kaplan that's really good. I read through all 293 pages about 3 times, but they're so good that you'll enjoy it...

Ok, that's enough for now. I'm doing my surgery rotation now, so it may take me a while to get back to you if you PM so please just post a question here if you're wondering anything or even cared to read this far....
 
nrosigh said:
273

You know, above 250 it doesn't really matter in terms of residency or whatever. And above 260 it's probably mostly an element of lucky guessing, so I wouldn't put too much weight into the score - above 260 it's essentially all the same. But for those of you who are curious, here are my random "pontifications" on preparing:

...for a description of my exam experience please see this thread:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=291773

1) Use the NBME tests for four purposes:
a) Gauge your performance
b) Learn how they ask questions
c) Learn what level of detail is required
d) Know what concepts they like - then research every question you are unsure of.

2) Goljan is the single best source out there, bar none. His 37 hours of audio and his Rapid Review Pathology book are brilliant. Start early! There are so many nuggets in there that it will take several times through the audio and book to absorb them all. And beyond the USMLE, I noticed that when the surgery residents ask me questions, I have heard many of the answers straight out of Goljan's mouth. He may be schizophrenic or whatever, but he explains things with an incredible clarity.

3) QBank is overpriced, overrated, outdated, and actually counterproductive. About 1/3 of the QBank questions are good. The rest are a complete waste of time, requiring a level of clinicallly-irrelevant minutia that is NOT indicative of the real test.

4) For those of you who have not yet started second year, make your own notes. It's so much easier to breeze through a 20-page summary of each exam instead of trying to make your way through a binder full of powerpoint printouts. No matter what school you go to, your second-year lectures are given by clinicians and pathologists - the same people that make the USMLE questions.

5) I studied one month "pure" (no classes), but I also started studying seriously after spring break 2nd year, so I studied about 3 or 4 months "dirty" (with classes going on).

6) Review when appropriate. The day before you start cardiac pathophysiology second year, spend some time reviewing cardiac physiology from first year. If you do this for every block, you will have reviewed mostly everything except for biochem and anatomy by the time boards rolls around.

7) Have fun! Like I said before, above 250 makes no difference for residency. You should study because it's fun, because you're finally piecing things together and learning things all the way through.

THE SOURCES: (aside from Goljan, who is far above all the others)

- Robbins Review Path Questions. 1200 Outstanding questions. I did all of them except for the "final exam" at the end. I highlighted all the answers that said something important, then reread my highlights after I finished the book. Great explanations, and the questions are pretty difficult.

- First Aid. Not such the bomb that everyone says it is, but a great source nonetheless. The main problem I thought was that it told me stuff that I either knew or couldn't decipher if I didn't. Some sections have too much detail (i.e. leukemias M1 through M7, and embryology of the genital tubercle), and some sections are of course too shallow (path). Generally very good, especially behavioral, pharm, phys (short but has most of the important graphs). I didn't read this seriously until 2 weeks before the test, and in the last day of study read the entire book once over for review.

- All of Dudek's HY books (Histo, CMB, Embryology, Anatomy). Just pick and choose here. There's way more detail than you need in any of these books, but the pictures are nice and they are good to skim as a review. If I had to pick one I'd go with HY histo, which as I've posted before is really a "Sleeper" - there's a lot of juicy stuff hiding behind its unfortunate title. Don't spend more than half a day on anatomy unless you don't know what the brachial plexus is. The embryology book is good for the nice chapters on menstrual cycle, pregnancy, fertilization, and chromosomal splitting (meiosis).

- Katzung pharmacology. THE BIG ONE. No, of course, I didn't read it. But I did spend half a day reading the caption to every illustration - many on the test were very similar.

- MAKE YOUR OWN NOTES. In addition to everything above, I relearned all my own notes (which were my primary sources for Micro, Neuro, and Pharm).

- BSS (Board Simulator Series). I posted on this earlier, do a search. Outdated, so don't take it too seriously, or get offended if you score 60%. The pathophysiology questions with lots of arrows going every which way were extremely helpful.

- Kaplan biochem. This is the one thing I've seen from Kaplan that's really good. I read through all 293 pages about 3 times, but they're so good that you'll enjoy it...

Ok, that's enough for now. I'm doing my surgery rotation now, so it may take me a while to get back to you if you PM so please just post a question here if you're wondering anything or even cared to read this far....



HOOOLLLLYYY ****

awesome job nro
 
Scored in the 230's. I was a bit disappointed since I was hoping to break 240. I still want to thank everyone for sharing their experiences and help.

If still waiting, good luck. Otherwise, congrats!
 
Hello. So I just received my score today. I got a 238. Is this good? I haven't gotten my 2 digit score yet because I just went into the office and asked for my score and that's all they gave me.

I'm fairly open minded, but am leaning towards emergency medicine.

So, any thoughts as to if this is considered "good" would be great, cause I really don't know.

Thanks.

-mpcc
 
I got my score yesterday and I'm very happy with it...

236/95

MCAT - 31
Q-bank - completed 100%, overall average 64% correct
I didn't take any NBME's
Free test - 80%

My original goal was to get around a 215. I came out of the test just hoping that I got above a 200, so I am amazed with my score!
 
264/99

-Did mostly First Aid and 1.5x through Qbank (%: upper 70s/lower 80s)
-Also did some BRS path
-High Yield Pharm (kinda sucked) and HY Gross anatomy/embryology.
-Flipped through the UCV books
-Read Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple during ID And it was so good I count it here.
-Did NBME #3 (680)
-Did the 150 free Qs (~90%)

Total I studied about 3.25 weeks, and I wish I did a bit less. It seemed as though 90% of what I needed I learned within the first 1.5 weeks of studying, and most of what I didn't know on test day/NBME I wouldn't have learned if I had studied for another month (just too esoteric, don't know what to study to find it). I did well on that one NMBE exam and then sat around for 3 days not able to study much more...again, wish I had taken it earlier, but I'm pleased with the way it all turned out.
 
A number of people from my school hang out here and know me, so no exact #'s....... it was b/t 1 and 2 standard-dev's above the avg though. I was very pleased.

I had a somewhat lazy second yr, which probably didn't hurt me considering what a POOR job Tech did with the second yr (luckily, that is chaning for future classes). We have/had higher-ups who still believe the step1 isn't that important 😡 ????????

Anywho:
Q-bank: 100% completed, 72% first pass correct with minimal cheating and little randomization. I re-did about half of it leading up to the exam
NBME1: 175..... school forced us to take it in March b/f I had studied for anything (inclding finals)
NBME2: 216...... taken after first pass through MS1 material and 3wks b/f the USMLE
Overall study time was 5wks. The 1st two were pretty lazy. The last three were more intense as I tried to learn all the high yield MS2 material that surprisingly wasn't stressed.

Score > 240 😀
 
chocomorsel said:
I'm pretty avg.
Step 1-210. Hope this is good enough to get me into ER. I didn't meet my goal of 215 (dead avg) but I guess I got close enough.

I'm proud of you. 🙂
 
Congrats to all who rocked the exam and to everyone who score around what they wanted!

I also scored around the mean. Very happy with it. It feels like such a big hurdle has been crossed. I didn't think this day would come, especially back in 1st year when I was barely passing anatomy :laugh:
 
Kaplan last 6 sets of 50(as of 1 week before exam): avg72, normalized 70
Kaplan overall 62%/three fourths completed
Prometric practice test 2.5 weeks prior:73%
USMLE:230...me happy 😀

I used First Aid and by no means knew it cold. I used some other sources, but nothing that intently (read through a few things once such as BRS path)

I did work very hard, but going into the test there was a lot I didn't know.
 
mpcc said:
Hello. So I just received my score today. I got a 238. Is this good? I haven't gotten my 2 digit score yet because I just went into the office and asked for my score and that's all they gave me.

I'm fairly open minded, but am leaning towards emergency medicine.

So, any thoughts as to if this is considered "good" would be great, cause I really don't know.

Thanks.

-mpcc

It is generally said that above 220 is competetive for EM. What does "competitive" mean? That's the million dollar question, but 238 sounds good to me. As I mentioned I got a 230, want to go into EM, and am happy with my score. My opinion: A 238 plus a solid application will probably get you in to most programs.

Good luck!...and congrats on the score!
 
Greetings, all. I used to post a little on SDN back in my pre-med days, but I lost the acct password, so here is my reincarnation. I have a question regarding Step 1 scores -- specifically, the discrimination on the upper end of the score range.

I got my score on Wednesday -- a 262. I understand that's a desirable score, but I'm not sure what it really adds up to. In other words, what's the real difference between a 240 and a 260 in terms of competitive strength? Also, I agree with the USMLEs decision to drop percentiles (because of inter-form variability), but what is a reasonable guess at my percentile? Does that number still shine in a pool of candidates for -- say -- radiology at a competitive program?
 
epic1044 said:
Does that number still shine in a pool of candidates for -- say -- radiology at a competitive program?


that will depend on your other scores, grades....... and how well you work at home on a pc reading radiographs.
 
I want to commend nrosigh on his/her sage study advice -- it's probably the most lucid and approachable USMLE wisdom that I've seen on here. I just hope future test-takers can find this thread.
 
epic1044 said:
Greetings, all. I used to post a little on SDN back in my pre-med days, but I lost the acct password, so here is my reincarnation. I have a question regarding Step 1 scores -- specifically, the discrimination on the upper end of the score range.

I got my score on Wednesday -- a 262. I understand that's a desirable score, but I'm not sure what it really adds up to. In other words, what's the real difference between a 240 and a 260 in terms of competitive strength? Also, I agree with the USMLEs decision to drop percentiles (because of inter-form variability), but what is a reasonable guess at my percentile? Does that number still shine in a pool of candidates for -- say -- radiology at a competitive program?

Based on the Gaussian curve, a 262 would be 97th-99th percentile (over 2 SD's).
 
264. very psyched... coming out of the test i didn't think i had done so well.

here were my preparation stats:

qbank - 77 average with 80% complete; i started around 70 and was scoring 84ish the week before the test.
nbme#1 - told me i'd get a 250
usmle 150 practice questions - told me i'd get a 273, think i got 91% of those right.
i used first aid, and read thru all of the kaplan 4 book series that you can buy.
good luck everyone!
 
OMG. Just got mine. (Our school wouldn't give ours out on Weds... the person who had them is on vacation, or something.)

Lots of people from my class post/read this, so I'll be vague... I did better than any of my practice tests.

Qbank Avg: 71%
Qbank Full length exam (6 weeks before): roughly equivalent to a 207
NBME 1 (1 mo. before): 216
NBME 2 (3 weeks before): 240
NBME 3 (2 weeks before): 224
NBME released questions (10 days before): 82%

And honestly, I came home after the test and looked up the ones I was unsure about... and 99.9% I answered wrong. So really- no worries. There's room for a wide margin of error.

YAY! 😀
 
wow, 260+ scores are being thrown around like candy on this thread...

I got 250+... I'm happy.
 
Nice.

Pinner Doc said:
OMG. Just got mine. (Our school wouldn't give ours out on Weds... the person who had them is on vacation, or something.)

Lots of people from my class post/read this, so I'll be vague... I did better than any of my practice tests.

Qbank Avg: 71%
Qbank Full length exam (6 weeks before): roughly equivalent to a 207
NBME 1 (1 mo. before): 216
NBME 2 (3 weeks before): 240
NBME 3 (2 weeks before): 224
NBME released questions (10 days before): 82%

And honestly, I came home after the test and looked up the ones I was unsure about... and 99.9% I answered wrong. So really- no worries. There's room for a wide margin of error.

YAY! 😀
 
OMG i can't believe this is FINALLY OVER. yeah, so scores arrived here in NYC.

Earlier I had posted that I left the test feeling seriously depressed and just BRAIN DEAD.... I know I had prepared well for the test but test day itself was such a douzy!

MCAT: 34
NBME form 1 - took 2-3 weeks before 2nd semester ended: 212
NBME form 2 - took 2.5 weeks before exam: 224
Qbank - finished 95%, towards the end was doing random blocks of 50 and getting in the 70's%
150 released items - 2 days before the test: 83%
Goal: 240+
Actual: 240+

I am ECSTATIC beyond relief, in spite of 240 being "mediocre" on this board..which is nuts.

bonnie
 
is it .... normal ... to have so many 260s??? dang i thought that score was really rare to get ...

but congrats to all of you who did! pray for us who are still waiting 🙂
 
missbonnie said:
I am ECSTATIC beyond relief, in spite of 240 being "mediocre" on this board..which is nuts.

bonnie

240+ is an outstanding score. You should be very proud of yourself. I don't think there is much difference b/w 240 or 260. It is a matter of getting a few more questions right which often is a guesswork, luck, etc. Way to go all!
 
dara678 said:
is it .... normal ... to have so many 260s??? dang i thought that score was really rare to get ...

but congrats to all of you who did! pray for us who are still waiting 🙂

No, it's not normal, that's the top 1%. It's called a biased sample. People with those scores are the ones that post.
 
can someone explain what the two digit score means? i know its converted from the 3 digit...but is it like if you took a test out of 100, that would be your score?
 
Sonora said:
240+ is an outstanding score. You should be very proud of yourself. I don't think there is much difference b/w 240 or 260. It is a matter of getting a few more questions right which often is a guesswork, luck, etc. Way to go all!


Thanks...now that I have some "proof" I wanted to say a few words....

I was a MEDIOCRE student my first 2 yrs, meaning I generally got the mean, sometimes below, sometimes above. I'm totally not exaggerating. I failed one of my gross anatomy written exams, and my histology final first yr. I also failed 2 exams during 2nd yr (pharmacology & GI Path - ironically, I asterisked that one on USMLE)...yeah doesn't make sense.

Bottom line - work ur butt off for that 4-5 weeks and you can see results (that and obsessively reading how to get 240+ on SDn.)

bonnie
 
I am happy to have a 219. I felt like USMLE vs. COMLEX were completed different animals that needed different strategies to do well unless one had superb reasoning skills coupled with great memory skills. I felt much more prepared for COMLEX than for USMLE. In fact, I was depressed for 3 days after USMLE thinking that I wasted my money taking the damn test if I was going to fail it. So relative to the sadness that I felt after I took that exam -- I am VERY happy with my score. I am happy to say that my score was the avg score for MD students -- that I was able to cram enough BS into my head about biochem and molecular bio to do okay.

NBME 3 470
NBME 1 400 (my score dropped -- very depressed)
NBME 4 480??

anyways -- it was money well-spent to take NBME -- and it pretty much predicted my score.
 
I got a 240 better than I thought.... NBME predicted a 236! pretty close!!!
 
Anyone knows the difference between the Qbanks that are in Adobe or Word document (the one sharing among students) the same as the kapalan online Qbank? they both are "Qbanks"! They come with explainations and all different subjects. I feel that the ones share among students are quite easy, yes they give tons of details/clues. The great part is to learn lots from the explanations..

What's the difference between Path and Pathophysio?? I thought they were the same kind of Qs, just that for pathophysio, there were combination of path and physio Qs?

After reading the scores that people post on here, I've been wondering, is it that easy to get score above 240?? It seems like only a couple of students got below 240, the rest of you all got ABOVE 240!!

240 is about 97, and 260+ is 99!!

It seems like the May and June tests were quite weird and difficult. YET almost everyone got the scores that they totally didnt expect of!! People who complained the difficulty of the exam and also claimed that they were just mediocor/aveage/normal students, yet they all got 240+ and 260+!!

Was it curve or people just simply too modest and expected too much after they took their exams (so they got depressed), or just cuz they are way too smart and work superly hard??

If step 1 require one to answer 60-70% correctly in order to pass (182), then people who score 240+ and 260+, they pretty much have aced the exam??

Oh man.. I thought 240+ was a nice decent goal...
I was more motivated after reading those posts, maybe the exam isnt that hard! people just exaggerated about it??
I also get more anxious... since not much time has left.. and I'm not superly motivated.. just study a few hrs everyday... ugggh

I only focused on the courses during the first 2 years, I just started preparing after the 2nd year was over.. I know some people on here were the same, and it only took them less than a month to prepare, and they score 260+ and 270+!! WOW I know for sure the exam is not that easy, but how in the world they could get all of the materials into their head within such a short time?

What should I do? Please help! THanks!
 
congrats brickhouse! I'm so freaked out...I just got my results sent out today...wish me luck
 
also how long after you requested ur score report did u receive ur score?
 
Well, I don't want to burst yer' bubble but people who are scoring 260+ are not waiting until classes are out to begin studying for this thing. They've systematically and probably repetitively studied the concepts of the first two years until they're reflexive in nature. Not only that but hard work will only take you so far.


On a more positive note, I don't think that you have to be hyper-intelligent (read: score a 260+) to be successful in even the most competitive of medical fields. Diligence, however, will be required of you and that's a freely available characteristic that is not limited to the few.
 
MCAT: 32
NBME form 1 - 3 weeks before Step 1: 244
NBME form 2 - 1.5 weeks before Step 1: 240
Qbank - finished 60%. Random blocks of 10-30 ?'s: Avg 65-70%
150 released items - apx 1 month prior to Step: 84%
Goal: 240+
Algorithm predicted score: 239-245
Step 1: 253



Study strategy:
Book list: First Aid x 1, Step Up x1, USMLE Step 1 Secrets x 1, reread First Aid x 1.

Comprehensive end of year MS II exams for pharm, path.
School sponsored 200? NBME practice test.
Study apx 6-8 hrs/day 5-6 days/week from May 10th - June 10th.

5 days prior to test date of Thurs. June 15th. Sun: OFF, Mon & Tues - apx 9-10 hrs reading 1st Aid for 2nd time. Wed (Day prior to exam): OFF except for last few high yield review pages of First Aid. Thurs: Step 1.
 
BRUINMD said:
After reading the scores that people post on here, I've been wondering, is it that easy to get score above 240?? It seems like only a couple of students got below 240, the rest of you all got ABOVE 240!!

240 is about 97, and 260+ is 99!!

It seems like the May and June tests were quite weird and difficult. YET almost everyone got the scores that they totally didnt expect of!! People who complained the difficulty of the exam and also claimed that they were just mediocor/aveage/normal students, yet they all got 240+ and 260+!!

Was it curve or people just simply too modest and expected too much after they took their exams (so they got depressed), or just cuz they are way too smart and work superly hard??

If step 1 require one to answer 60-70% correctly in order to pass (182), then people who score 240+ and 260+, they pretty much have aced the exam??

Dude, how many people are posting those high scores here? 50? 100? 200? Even if it were 1,000 it would be a tiny sample. Seeing other people's scores on here means nothing. The bell curve doesn't lie.
 
oudoc08 said:
MCAT: 32
NBME form 1 - 3 weeks before Step 1: 244
NBME form 2 - 1.5 weeks before Step 1: 240
Qbank - finished 60%. Random blocks of 10-30 ?'s: Avg 65-70%
150 released items - apx 1 month prior to Step: 84%
Goal: 240+
Algorithm predicted score: 239-245
Step 1: 253
good gracious, CONGRATULATIONS ALL AROUND.

ooh sooooo worried...

::biting nails::
 
Was looking for 235 got a 243. I would agree w/ some of the other posts that Kaplan Qbank are not realistic but still an excellent learning tool. They taught me how I needed to think. School provided Kaplan review, Goljan (lectures and text), FA, High yield biochem.
 
hudsontc said:
Well, I don't want to burst yer' bubble but people who are scoring 260+ are not waiting until classes are out to begin studying for this thing.

No, that's what I did. Step 1 studying (the ~3 weeks in May/June) is a process of remembering all the material you learned during your 1st and 2nd year. As such, the review material is designed more to remind you of the concepts you should already know, and not designed to teach them anew. That makes review material a pretty god awful study tool during second year in my honest opinion (with the notable exceptions of BRS path and Clinical Micro Made Ridiculously Simple).

The bottom line though, is that if you study hard, with just your classes in mind, during 1st and 2nd year you'll find when you sit down to study for boards that you've already learned the vast majority of what you need to do well on Step 1 without even realizing you were studying for it.
 
BRUINMD said:
Oh man.. I thought 240+ was a nice decent goal...

That is a good goal, anything above that is probably just gravy.

And just focusing on classes during 2nd year was/is a good strategy, you should do fine (although I'm confused about the timing here, is your school on some weird schedule where you haven't taken the exam yet?)
 
Hmm. . are you guys receiving them in the mail or checking with your school? I'm thinking I might get the mail today . . . We shall see 🙂

Congrats to all. I hope you get what you want.
 
Score reported on Wednesday, but my school won't release scores. Still waiting for snail mail. Mail came and went today (Saturday) but no score report! some people in my class received their scores yesterday.

Here's hoping for Monday. Damn snail mail.
 
velo said:
No, that's what I did. Step 1 studying (the ~3 weeks in May/June) is a process of remembering all the material you learned during your 1st and 2nd year. As such, the review material is designed more to remind you of the concepts you should already know, and not designed to teach them anew. That makes review material a pretty god awful study tool during second year in my honest opinion (with the notable exceptions of BRS path and Clinical Micro Made Ridiculously Simple).

The bottom line though, is that if you study hard, with just your classes in mind, during 1st and 2nd year you'll find when you sit down to study for boards that you've already learned the vast majority of what you need to do well on Step 1 without even realizing you were studying for it.

Oh, I absolutely agree with that. What I mean to say is that people who are scoring that well have been preparing for boards throughout the first two years by really wrestling with the concepts they're presented with, rather than cramming for each test as they come.

I by no means meant to convey that I thought a 6 month board study schedule (or anything greater than 5 weeks, for that matter) to be appropriate for such a goal. It is referred to as 'board review' for a reason.
 
Top