- Joined
- Jun 4, 2016
- Messages
- 682
- Reaction score
- 1,413
I've always wanted to start one of these...So here we go!
My stats:
M2
Test time: June 2018
Goal score: 270
My stats:
M2
Test time: June 2018
Goal score: 270
Last edited:
Not sure if they were in Uworld/fa but I knew them. Maybe in class or kaplan/ rx qbank.
Ya, sorry, if you're getting a bloody 85! average on uworld your brain is most def not average! Either way, keep rocking-- congrats on the success so far
probably doesn't matter. i did uw before dedicated started so had extra time and did these during dedicated but you can also do the reverseI see what you're saying. Just wondering - did you do Kaplan/Rx during your school year and stop come dedicated? I have a little over half of Kaplan left and not sure if I should do it or not.
probably doesn't matter. i did uw before dedicated started so had extra time and did these during dedicated but you can also do the reverse
yesI'm in dedicated now so I guess I might try to squeeze a few in every here and there. Overall though, you felt like the material was all within UFAP?
Count me in for 258If anyone can exactly guess what I'll get on step 1 on the 23rd, I'll send them a Pizza
Well I reallllly hope I get to send you a pizza
Doesn't it crush you to know that PDs will treat you the same as anyone else that scores a 255+ no matter how high you score? lmao
I scored the EXACT same on bothImpulsively woke up this morning and decided to take UWSA2.
NBME 13: 234
CBSE: 248
UWSA1: 258
UWSA2: 256
Really hope that what they say about UWSA2 being a strong predictor is true! 26 days to go.
I don't think anyone regards them as the same, but I've been told by multiple people in different settings that as long as you score a 250+, doors shouldn't be closed to you (which is why I set it as my goal). Obviously, having a higher score can make those doors more easily crossed!>conveniently chooses his own score as the arbitrary cut-off where scores magically stop mattering
Nice ego defense, bro!
I'm not presuming that I'll score higher or even as high as you, but you are 100% delusional if you think a 255 is regarded the same as a 270.
>conveniently chooses his own score as the arbitrary cut-off where scores magically stop mattering
Nice ego defense, bro!
I'm not presuming that I'll score higher or even as high as you, but you are 100% delusional if you think a 255 is regarded the same as a 270.
I don't think anyone regards them as the same, but I've been told by multiple people in different settings that as long as you score a 250+, doors shouldn't be closed to you (which is why I set it as my goal). Obviously, having a higher score can make those doors more easily crossed!
Well, if you look at Charting Outcomes, people with 260+ on step 1 generally match better than people with 250-259, particularly for derm. It could also be that people with stellar step 1 scores are also otherwise excellent applicants.I have to echo @piii a little here and a few others but I've been told by numerous PDs that Step is important but score ranges really above a 250 and even 245 are not going to make different physicians or surgeons and is rarely discussed in rank meetings. I spoke to one PD who actually said he lets their cutoff determine who he looks at but after that he doesn't care what the score is (he said that's why they've instilled a cutoff but it is reasonably "low" [who knows what that means]).
Well, if you look at Charting Outcomes, people with 260+ on step 1 generally match better than people with 250-259, particularly for derm. It could also be that people with stellar step 1 scores are also otherwise excellent applicants.
I have to echo @piii a little here and a few others but I've been told by numerous PDs that Step is important but score ranges really above a 250 and even 245 are not going to make different physicians or surgeons and is rarely discussed in rank meetings. I spoke to one PD who actually said he lets their cutoff determine who he looks at but after that he doesn't care what the score is (he said that's why they've instilled a cutoff but it is reasonably "low" [who knows what that means]).
you are 100% delusional if you think a 255 is regarded the same as a 270.
Don't even engage with them dude. Let your phenomenal score speak for itself. I'm rooting for you. You said earlier you were getting max 12 questions wrong on NBMEs so I'm surprised by your score of <260. You still have weeks of dedicated left though and maybe it was a fluke. With school out of the picture your efforts can be more focused now. Good luck!
Much of us are rooting for each other but you still have to realize that a moderate level of confrontation is healthy. If someone isnt able to deal with confrontation appropriately then that's an issue.
Well, if you look at Charting Outcomes, people with 260+ on step 1 generally match better than people with 250-259, particularly for derm. It could also be that people with stellar step 1 scores are also otherwise excellent applicants.
I agree, but I think piii was condescending in his/her response: "I bet you'll never be in a position where you were ranked higher simply because you had a 270 and they had a 257." None of us are in the position to speak with authority over what PDs look for since we are only medical students. Everyone on SDN also preaches being "well-rounded" to get into medical school, but now that we are students we recognize that a high MCAT + GPA can offset any other part of the application more than the reverse can (low scores with stellar ECs/LORs, etc). I mention this to demonstrate that SDN's opinion is not necessarily representative of reality. It's no secret that Step 1 is the most important factor in residency applications, and to make blanket assumptions such as having a glass ceiling to the effects of a good score is naive imo. When every applicant is competitive with 250s+, the 270 is what is going to set someone apart. Regardless, I understand that a 250+ is an AMAZING score that anyone should be happy with, but if someone wants to shoot for the stars then what right does anyone else have to be offended?Much of us are rooting for each other but you still have to realize that a moderate level of confrontation is healthy. If someone isnt able to deal with confrontation appropriately then that's an issue.
I agree, but I think piii was condescending in his/her response: "I bet you'll never be in a position where you were ranked higher simply because you had a 270 and they had a 257." None of us are in the position to speak with authority over what PDs look for since we are only medical students. Everyone on SDN also preaches being "well-rounded" to get into medical school, but now that we are students we recognize that a high MCAT + GPA can offset any other part of the application more than the reverse can (low scores with stellar ECs/LORs, etc). I mention this to demonstrate that SDN's opinion is not necessarily representative of reality. It's no secret that Step 1 is the most important factor in residency applications, and to make blanket assumptions such as having a glass ceiling to the effects of a good score is naive imo. When every applicant is competitive with 250s+, the 270 is what is going to set someone apart. Regardless, I understand that a 250+ is an AMAZING score that anyone should be happy with, but if someone wants to shoot for the stars then what right does anyone else have to be offended?
Anyway, I remember you from the waitlist thread 2 years ago and I'm happy to see that you're almost at the end of your preclinical years. Best of luck to you.
Whoa, that wasn't a personal attack at all. I was on that thread with you, and I didn't get off the waitlist that year (I am a year behind you). I genuinely was just happy to see you doing well because we communicated a lot over that thread 2-3 years ago. I always like seeing your and bananafish's posts. What's with the hostility? I support Foot Fetish's desire to do well, I support your journey in medical school, and I support any other medical student because I am one too.EDIT: I totally missed your personal attack on me being waitlisted! I was totally waitlisted at a number of schools, but also had super early acceptances. Let's say all things worked out best, I can't complain thank you!
Whoa, that wasn't a personal attack at all. I was on that thread with you, and I didn't get off the waitlist that year (I am a year behind you). I genuinely was just happy to see you doing well because we communicated a lot over that thread 2-3 years ago. I always like seeing your and bananafish's posts. What's with the hostility? I support Foot Fetish's desire to do well, I support your journey in medical school, and I support any other medical student because I am one too.
I find it rather weird that people elevate Step 1 to such an incredibly high pedestal on this forum. To me, there's a difference between making Step 1 the most important test of your life and the most important thing in your life. Everyone should study their butt off for this test and leave no stone unturned, but what's the purpose of having it consume your entire life? I think I saw someone on the first few pages of this thread want to get a 275 and start studying from day 1 of M1 year. How is that even a feasible goal for anyone? I'm all for "you do you" but it just seems like nonsense to me. When you're years into your career, in what measurable way will Step 1 have an impact on your career, the satisfaction you derive from your speciality, the money you make, etc? How will you even know the direct role your Step 1 score played in the residency application process? How will you know in what way or even whether it played a significant role in how you were ranked? When you match into a program, on what basis can you *selectively* pick your step 1 score as being the factor that allowed you to match at a particular hospital or in a particular city, versus other factors? Not to mention that residency is a clean slate and practically nothing that we will do in medical school matters once residency starts and you're treating patients. The neuroticism and insanity really boggle my mind sometimes.
Way too many spoilers all over social media right now lolDon’t mean to break the tension but.... that infinity wars movie tho
I've been uro since middle of M1, lucked into a good research mentor who is a uro that let me follow him around.For all the people scoring 250+s , what specialities are you guys thinking of?
Thinking of setting up meetings with different surgical specialities (ortho, neuro,uro)
Anyone have good resources for the different receptor pathways? i.e. Jak-Stat, Tyrosine kinase, etc. including which receptors are related to which pathways (like Insulin = tyrosine kinase, glucagon = GPCR)? In my opinion first aid does an absolute abominable job with organizing it all. It's super high yield but I haven't found a good summary out there.
Yeah I think this is the right attitude. Depending on the specialty, step 1 isn't going to be worth the time and effort. If you're going for academic neurosurg or plastics or whatever, and you come from a mid-tier school, I can see doing what you have to do to give yourself every chance at a high score, but understand that this is not the MCAT. The test will be minimally like the practice exams.The neuroticism though isn't completely unfounded. It's hard to deny that the higher your board score, the better your odds are at matching into the specialty and into the location that you prefer. You can be the nicest guy, be a superstar on rotations, but a 210 Step 1 will shut you out simply because you won't make the screen. Going hardcore and spending 12 hours a day studying starting in M1 is of course ridiculous because it isn't mentally sustainable, but shutting yourself away for a handful of months before your Step 1 isn't unreasonable. The whole match process of matching is complex, but if you think about it as playing odds, for certain specialties, a strong Step 1 gives you the best chance at being considered. I say for certain specialties because if your goal is family medicine, there's no reason why you should kill yourself trying to get a 260+. After you have the match letter in your hand though, the purpose that the Step 1 serves is minuscule say for possibly applying to fellowships later.
Yeah I think this is the right attitude. Depending on the specialty, step 1 isn't going to be worth the time and effort. If you're going for academic neurosurg or plastics or whatever, and you come from a mid-tier school, I can see doing what you have to do to give yourself every chance at a high score, but understand that this is not the MCAT. The test will be minimally like the practice exams.
Having just taken the exam, I can tell you 100% that it is random enough and weird enough that there are no guarantees, especially in the > 250 range. I got some questions on things I thought were completely overkill to study because they weren't in UFAP at all. I got questions on low-yield FA topics. Most importantly though, I got tons and tons of vague, obscure questions that were unclear and nearly impossible to answer. I was scoring 260+ on NBMEs and UWSAs towards the end and I marked 15-20 per section on the real deal. This was not so different from my UW blocks as I flag liberally, but the difference is that when I flagged stuff on the real thing, I really didn't know. All I can say is that I almost wish I just took it at baseline, prior to the pool change, with class knowledge still in my head. I was constantly trying to pull things from the back of my mind, including stuff from M1 and even prior.
Also, people who take this after a clinical year have a massive, massive advantage.
I think PDs must know how random it is. I had a few topics that were among my lowest in UW pop up over and over, while many other huge topics were massively underrepresented. I think I had 2 cardio and immuno questions on the whole thing. A friend of mine took it sitting right next to me and said she basically took an immuno exam combined with obscure anatomy.
This test wasn't designed originally to be scored linearly. Obviously accuracy isn't their 1st priority or you wouldn't have people on here getting a 240 and a 265 on the same test 4 days out both getting a 255. The base of knowledge they are pulling from isn't UFAP. UFAP is just the highest yield. The NBME sees nothing as "off limits." So UFAP just introduces you to the highest yield stuff, and on test day you get your socks blown off trying to pick between 5 study types you've never heard of on an obscure biostats question. There are experimental questions, but there were too many weird questions for them all to be experimental, and even if they throw those away, you're looking at a very small # of questions to accurately assess someone's overall understanding of the principles of medicine.
I've also heard from IM PDs are the top of the top (e.g. MGH, JHH), that the score only helps if they see you as a particular type of person. Obviously they fill their spots with geniuses, but they want a well-rounded class. You need a 260+ if you're scoring a spot in that class by virtue of your sheer brilliance and scientific acumen. 240+ is fine if they see you as a future leader and you have some serious accomplishments on your resume.
Still keeping my foot in the door with plastics because I think the research is fascinating, but honestly, I feel like my heart is more aligned with some sort of medical subspecialty.For all the people scoring 250+s , what specialities are you guys thinking of?
Thinking of setting up meetings with different surgical specialities (ortho, neuro,uro)
Also, people who take this after a clinical year have a massive, massive advantage.
Yeah, I also really like medical subspecialties like cardiology/GI but the uncertainty of doing internal and maybe not matching into those is something I'd rather avoid. That's really pushing me towards surgical subspecialtiesStill keeping my foot in the door with plastics because I think the research is fascinating, but honestly, I feel like my heart is more aligned with some sort of medical subspecialty.
Yeah I think this is the right attitude. Depending on the specialty, step 1 isn't going to be worth the time and effort. If you're going for academic neurosurg or plastics or whatever, and you come from a mid-tier school, I can see doing what you have to do to give yourself every chance at a high score, but understand that this is not the MCAT. The test will be minimally like the practice exams.
Having just taken the exam, I can tell you 100% that it is random enough and weird enough that there are no guarantees, especially in the > 250 range. I got some questions on things I thought were completely overkill to study because they weren't in UFAP at all. I got questions on low-yield FA topics. Most importantly though, I got tons and tons of vague, obscure questions that were unclear and nearly impossible to answer. I was scoring 260+ on NBMEs and UWSAs towards the end and I marked 15-20 per section on the real deal. This was not so different from my UW blocks as I flag liberally, but the difference is that when I flagged stuff on the real thing, I really didn't know. All I can say is that I almost wish I just took it at baseline, prior to the pool change, with class knowledge still in my head. I was constantly trying to pull things from the back of my mind, including stuff from M1 and even prior.
Also, people who take this after a clinical year have a massive, massive advantage.
I think PDs must know how random it is. I had a few topics that were among my lowest in UW pop up over and over, while many other huge topics were massively underrepresented. I think I had 2 cardio and immuno questions on the whole thing. A friend of mine took it sitting right next to me and said she basically took an immuno exam combined with obscure anatomy.
This test wasn't designed originally to be scored linearly. Obviously accuracy isn't their 1st priority or you wouldn't have people on here getting a 240 and a 265 on the same test 4 days out both getting a 255. The base of knowledge they are pulling from isn't UFAP. UFAP is just the highest yield. The NBME sees nothing as "off limits." So UFAP just introduces you to the highest yield stuff, and on test day you get your socks blown off trying to pick between 5 study types you've never heard of on an obscure biostats question. There are experimental questions, but there were too many weird questions for them all to be experimental, and even if they throw those away, you're looking at a very small # of questions to accurately assess someone's overall understanding of the principles of medicine.
I've also heard from IM PDs are the top of the top (e.g. MGH, JHH), that the score only helps if they see you as a particular type of person. Obviously they fill their spots with geniuses, but they want a well-rounded class. You need a 260+ if you're scoring a spot in that class by virtue of your sheer brilliance and scientific acumen. 240+ is fine if they see you as a future leader and you have some serious accomplishments on your resume.
Wow. This scares the heck out of me! Based on your experience of the exam what would you would add to the normal UFAP method to be a little better prepared? I have heard many people who take it after doing their clinical year say that it was extremely helpful as well so I guess that is a bummer for those that cannot. However, what type of score do you think studying the high yield (UFAP) would get a regular student on any given test day regardless of how the information is skewed towards certain disciplines? Congrats on being done and I am sure everything worked out for you!
I'm not very well-educating when it comes to residency/matching into fellowships, etc. Do you know how often that happens, even anecdotally?Yeah, I also really like medical subspecialties like cardiology/GI but the uncertainty of doing internal and maybe not matching into those is something I'd rather avoid. That's really pushing me towards surgical subspecialties
When people say they had Step 2 style "next step" management questions, were they really Step 2 questions ? I feel like people hype that up, when in reality FA probably gives you all you need to answer those. I mean, there are a lot of one-liners in FA about preferred imaging modalities . I highly doubt they're asking about the nuances of the FAST algorithm for blunt abdominal trauma...it's probably more like "You suspect osteomyelitis; Next step?" And they simply want you to recall that MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis.
I had a couple OB questions that definitely were not in any UFAPs/Step 1 material. One question involving hospital equipment/devices I've never used and was not familiar with. One question involved fluid management. One required knowing ultrasound technique and I only knew because my school has an ultrasound lecture for all organ systems. And probably a few more. You can get them down to 2 possibilities with logic for the most part. There were a handful, but not enough that you couldn't get in the 250s if you got them all wrong.
I am not too sure. I know that GI is the most competitive IM fellowship followed by cardiology. A google search showed up GI having a match rate in high 60s and cardio have a match rate in the 80s. If you go into a prestigious IM institution for residency, your chances go up dramatically is what I understandI'm not very well-educating when it comes to residency/matching into fellowships, etc. Do you know how often that happens, even anecdotally?
Yes I agree. If you love the IM subspecialties and don't want to do anything else, you have a pretty good shot at them especially with a high step 1 score which will allow you to match into a good institution. GI is a little tougher than cards, but definitely doable.That's why I said you should talk to residents. If I remember correctly, the average step for someone matching cards was 240-245. The people who were competitive from the beginning are competitive throughout. And if you look at charting the match, 631 people matching IM have above 250. There are 30-50 people in most IM intern classes, so that means the top 20 programs have enough space for the 631 with much room left over. I think all the top 30 programs have 95-98% fellowship match rate. You will have to work, but I don't think it is as bad as you think
Prestige isn't always necessary either. Connections are important. Some programs hold spots for their residents.
ThanksDang dude, sorry about the stagnation. Are you improving in uworld (also do you mind if I ask what percent you have, as my goal is national avg so your nbmes are around what I'm shooting for haha)? If so, maybe it's just a NBME question style deal? I've only taken two and both were before I did much uworld so can't provide much more of a personal anecdote than that. I can say, though, that I have three close friends who all had similar nbmes to what you have and the nbmes under-predicted for all 3 of them. Hopefully that provides some giddy-up, so to speak .
And, yes, that is a win. I think you should name them and make one a step 1, everglade cabin mascot.
I can't comment on whether it "now includes" Step 2 stuff because I've only taken it once and only this year. These topics, however, were Step 2 topics and are in FA for Step 2 and Step Up to Medicine and UWorld for Step 2. These were not wtf questions (I only had one of those). Like I said, these were questions where you can make educated guesses, but you'd probably know straight up if you already finished 3rd year.
(I actually think the impossible anatomy and micro stuff is the exaggeration. Most of my anatomy was not in FA, but definitely a level of detail reasonable to expect us to know)
How far out dude(tte)!!?Took NBME 15 today, scored a 242! Improved from a 228 on NBME 13. The NBME questions really have a different feel from UW...