When entering ECs and work experience is it best to just lay out objectively what it entailed or elaborate some (i.e., what was gained from it or how it was meaningful)?
Example: which is better A or B
A: I ran participants in studies in a social psychology lab aimed at exploring existential motives related to the self and self-meaning. Duties included planning and organizing studies with the primary investigator and graduate assistant, setting-up the lab, coding data, troubleshooting, greeting, briefing, and debriefing participants
B: I ran participants in studies in a social psychology lab aimed at exploring existential motives related to the self and self-meaning. Duties included planning and organizing studies with the primary investigator and graduate assistant, setting-up the lab, coding data, troubleshooting, greeting, briefing, and debriefing participants. Working as a research assistant, I greatly valued being able to continue to learn and explore in greater detail topics which caught my interest in class. I enjoyed being able to problem solve by applying concepts covered in my research methods and social psychology courses and actively extending my education beyond the classroom. Through this experience I discovered how much I not only appreciated, but enjoyed research and would like to continue to be involved in it as I continue my education and into my career.
(B is kind of long, ****ally written, and not exactly what I would write but it demonstrates the point)