I added this last sentence in here right before you replied so I don't think you got a chance to see it, but what do you think of the change to the organization name as can be seen above?
Maybe you could add in whether the Western Psychological Association Convention is regional or national.
That's fine.
Well done.
I think it's fine as you've described above, but I suggest adding a brief inclusive timeframe to the second description, like "122.5 hours between the above timeframes", or "during 2015-16."
1) No, it doesn't matter which tag you use. And an advantage of using Hobbies is that you don't need a Contact.
I think it's a safe assumption that everyone likely to read your application will understand that acronym, so you're fine.
What sort have you attended that you wouldn't have already mentioned in a Research, Presentations/Posters, Hobbies, Employment, or Leadership space?
1) Besides making the name something that suggests your title (?Blog Author or Writer, perhaps), you might add what you're blogging on: About My Life Journey, Fashion, Exercise and Diet, or whatever.
Then it's fine to go with a nonspecific title, emphasize your enjoyment of writing as a leisuretime activity, and not give sufficient information for a curious adcomm to look it up.
1) Yes. If your name is on the author list, you can list it under Presentations/Posters or in the affiliated Research space regardless of whether you stood next to the poster and answered questions, or not.
1) Yes. Shortening the citation in that way is fine, if space is an issue. You might want to include the PI if they are one of the authors.
I'd be fine with you keeping the current Name of the space, but adding to it, "& Observer," as most of the time you were watching (as I recall). To decrease potential confusion in the reader, you might consider stating that "shadowing was 90% of the time and patient interaction 10% (or whatever)," as this will explain why you picked the tag that you did for the space.
That's fine, too.
Is it Accepted (in which case how long are we talking, and might it appear as an e-publication ahead of print)? Or Accepted, pending minor revisions? Or Accepted, pending major revisions? Do you have a letter or email stating the manuscript is accepted?
A manuscript accepted after minor revisions is considered "Accepted," but one that requires major revision is not.
Yes, it's fine to list it among your AMCAS activities. The date you'd enter into the Publications header would be the acceptance date.
1a) Yes. b) I agree.
1) It depends on what you covered with the activities you did list (given the possibility that some activities are double or triple or quadruple dippers) and what experiences a school considers essential for their consideration. Every school is different.
If you didn't pay the required fees then your application will not go anywhere. There is no reason to delete the filled out application form, as you can use it for reference while you fine tune the responses for next year's new application (which will have a different link, but for which you'll need the same username and password). Some basic information will repopulate in the next application, but you'll have to fill out most of it again, unfortunately including the transcript and Activities areas.
What were the criteria for your selection? Are you given an interview guide, or are your questions self-selected? What would your role be on the selection committee? How many hours of participation would you list?
1) "also a final tall almond students"? You'll have to interpret this for me.
They might assume a proportion of the total hours you listed would be future hours, if you didn't explain in the narrative that the listed hours had already been completed. Whether that's an issue or not would depend on total time span, total hours listed, and how many hours might reasonably be assumed to be already completed. The more critical ones of concern would be clinical involvement, nonmedical community service, and shadowing (depending on whether you included sub-timespans in the narrative space).
1) Fortunately, you have good longevity for each of those activities. If the proportionate hours for the remaining year are subtracted, you still have a decent amount for each.
Sounds good.
