To all the newly-minted 3rd years, congrats!
I am going to be starting NYCOM in Aug for the class of 2012 and am currently enrolled in DPC.
Can anyone who took the boards recently reflect on their experience in DPC and how it prepared them for boards? My main concern is significant gaps in knowledge. Do you think you were prepared for boards better, worse, or equal to the lecture kids? I understand that a large portion of boards success is attributed to the individual but I am quite nervous (and excited) about DPC.
Also, comments in general about DPC? I see that there is a great deal of administrative distress from the lecture kids, but I rarely see DPC kids from 2010 and 2011 venting on the boards.
THANKS! AND CONGRATS ON TAKING YOUR EXAMS!
In terms of pathology/pathophysiology of things covered on the boards, we were fine. I think most of us read Guyton/Costanzo/Robbins and Goljan or BRS throughout the year, so when it came time to re-read/review Goljan/BRS for boards it was familiar. It also helps to have a pathologist as the head of the program - I think we were all plenty familiar with slides and trying to correlate them with patient presentation.
In terms of the boards thing, I can only speak for myself - I felt tremendous gaps in my knowledge of microbio & neuro
in general. That being said, I felt that (for my exam, at least) FA was sufficient for these topics. In fact, FA and Goljan was sufficient for ALL topics on my USMLE. So while I never really learned micro or neuro, what I learned in FA was enough to get me by on the boards. Same with pharm.
In my final 4-5 weeks of board review, I kept saying to myself over and over again, I wish I had more
direction to know THIS is what was important! But then again, I never bothered to ask anyone and never really looked at FA as much as I should have the 1st 2 yrs. I never watched lectures either. So the resources were available to me, but I didn't take full advantage. I wish I had popped open FA and glanced at the 5 or 6 pgs of embryo that is important instead of trying to actually read a book on it. I wish I took pharm flashcards and highlighted onto them everything from FA so I didn't waste time reading G/G. Yes, I read G/G. I wish I looked at the beautiful "big picture" biochem diagram in FA before trying to read/understand all those metabolism chapters so that I knew that the only thing that was important was rate limiting steps and deficiencies.
So while I wish I had more direction, I don't know whose fault that is. I mean, I paying them a lot of money, right? The least I could get is some direction. Many of us felt that we got caught up in irrelevant minutiae the first year and only got our acts together second year. Thats a lot of wasted time. You won't truly appreciate how precious time is until you start your hardcore studying for boards.
The administration... well, some of them are stubborn (to put it mildly). While we told them to change the case library to reflect more neuro and more microbio and less kidney, we got the response, oh so youre experts on the kidney then? So then of course we did what we had to - independent learning, learning things completely unrelated to the case. Outside of their stubborness, I think they're okay - we get fed and we get to b*tch directly to them, and to each other, once a month. Dr. Elkowitz was kind enough to rearrange our schedule a few times when it was clearly unfair, so I think he's definately more "on our side" than the general NYCOM admin's.
Overall, if I could do it again, I would... but would keep MUCH more of an eye towards what is
board relevant. You'll get these lines about "you don't know whats gonna be on the boards" and therefore you have to prepare for everything"... IMO, thats erroneous b/c that would mean Kaplan, BRS, FA, all the review companies would be out of business. So just make sure you THOROUGHLY use those review materials alongside your primary sources when youre studying to make sure you
take away whats important. Everyones got their favorite books, but your most favorite should be your review books, if for no other reason than the fact that you will not have any other source of direction.