Okami WW Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Fluff is low hanging misyeet fruit if she is village this game. I consider myself low hanging misyeet fruit as well historically speaking and going by more recent games.
Go read bowling and tell me she’s a low hanging fruit.
 
Fluff is low hanging misyeet fruit if she is village this game. I consider myself low hanging misyeet fruit as well historically speaking and going by more recent games.
She's been misyeeted once after playing multiple games. How are you reading her currently?

If you're low hanging fruit, then I'm low hanging fruit. Average our games together.
 
She's been misyeeted once after playing multiple games. How are you reading her currently?

If you're low hanging fruit, then I'm low hanging fruit. Average our games together.
I spent so long last game arguing that she's low-hanging fruit that I started to believe it, but you're right, she doesn't really qualify.
 
Yeah. With it being mountainous I assumed 3.
Actually mountainous is slightly wolf-sided at baseline.

Pack of 3 here needs 3 misyeets to win
Pack of 2 needs 4.

Hmm. Not actually sure what I would do lol
 
@Animal Midwife
071CD2E3-15CE-4AD8-8AD2-9A8DEBE3305C.jpeg
 
Wait, you identified me last game? That wasn't what I recall. You were on my list of "people who might help me push a misyeet on a Blocc member".
Sure, I can be counted on for helping misyeets. Doesn't mean I didn't sus you.

But I kept pointing out how you pinged me in posts, which is why I kept asking who was supposed to be responsible for reading you. Because certain players often read wolfy to me, like samac or you. And don't think I didn't notice when you decided to turn on me for an easy misyeet in the post where I said "this post is so much wolfy BS" which was sorta the last thing I said before I had to ghost thread until last min before I was yeeted.
 
WALL POST
NO SPOILERS CAUSE THEN YOU ALL DONT READ EM

You don’t get nervous early, zenges.

It’s supposed to be your nose hairs, not your nose. It’s what makes your eye twitch.

It does for me. Nose hairs.

REACTION TESTS ARE THE BEST
and you shouldn’t say it before
Just start chaos and watch what happens.

I like this post

Good good. This is how you confirm me as village.

It’s been belabored since I quoted this, but early game something has to happen for the game to start. If it’s salt and how people react to that salt it’s fine.

Fluff killed me. Bragged about it on thread as she went down. I’m allowed to have my salt.

TELEPATHY

Where did I do that? The only early sus I saw was true -> zenge.

Really? I’ve watched you choke on AM’s fist as I died screaming to yeet her.
If she was wolfing and was going to pick one of us to get out which of us do you think she’d go for?

Is fluff a low hanging misyeet fruit? She’s been misyeeted once. Yeeted correctly twice.

You never voted for true? He outlived you?
Fluff definitely meets my definition of LHF.

I don't bother to put votes on people that there is too much traction against voting any more these days.
 
The thoughts don't make sense though. It's one thing to think post-game "bummer that wolves struggle to misyeet" versus pushing that idea this game, while alive.

Cray also has rocked the boat multiple times while wolfing, so I don't understand why you think this is outside of her range .
I rock it harder when I'm village.

The salt vote trend has been bothering me for a while.

Plus, honestly I thought Dubz was salt voting True based on her second post after voting True, answering the question of why with a joke referencing a past game where True won. Referencing past games in a jokey way as a reason for D1 votes where there is little other reason to vote someone I took to be the definition of jokey salt (if not the only definition of a salt vote). I thought both you and Dubz on True D1 was a little much unless you really thought they were wolfing (hard to believe this early in game) or you both really thought the pressure was needed there to get an early read on them. But I really hadn't accounted for people being fooled by True last game. But True has pinged me as wolfy in most games I can recall playing with them, so I don't pretend to be great at correctly reading True, except that I expect to have little difficulty being convinced by others to vote there if they agree they seem wolfy. But I kind of forgot that while *I* might think in my head that TN is wolfy and have no issues voting there as needed, that others might struggle to see wolfiness there when it actually is there.
 
I rock it harder when I'm village.

The salt vote trend has been bothering me for a while.

Plus, honestly I thought Dubz was salt voting True based on her second post after voting True, answering the question of why with a joke referencing a past game where True won. Referencing past games in a jokey way as a reason for D1 votes where there is little other reason to vote someone I took to be the definition of jokey salt (if not the only definition of a salt vote). I thought both you and Dubz on True D1 was a little much unless you really thought they were wolfing (hard to believe this early in game) or you both really thought the pressure was needed there to get an early read on them. But I really hadn't accounted for people being fooled by True last game. But True has pinged me as wolfy in most games I can recall playing with them, so I don't pretend to be great at correctly reading True, except that I expect to have little difficulty being convinced by others to vote there if they agree they seem wolfy. But I kind of forgot that while *I* might think in my head that TN is wolfy and have no issues voting there as needed, that others might struggle to see wolfiness there when it actually is there.
So what's the main takeaway from this post? I'm getting whiplash from seeing True shouldn't be pressured, to saying you often read him wrong, to saying you'll vote for him if others do, to saying he can't be wolfy this early on, to saying others misclear him.
 
So what's the main takeaway from this post? I'm getting whiplash from seeing True shouldn't be pressured, to saying you often read him wrong, to saying you'll vote for him if others do, to saying he can't be wolfy this early on, to saying others misclear him.
The important thing to remember is that I am always a good and noble villager
 
but not this boat. this boat is different.

and i didn't get the same message you seem to have. i thought this was about being clique-y and pushing easy misyeets. i am very interested in the apparent reversal of sentiment, as cray has been very pro-noobyeet in the past.
Yeah I've been really working against that grain. One reason was that in 10th Ann and the last game I played, I found that the noobs were actually the most openminded players and I find that very refreshing. I had an old-timer anti-noob approach before but realized with so many old timers gone and struggling to fill a roster that an anti-noob attitude was really hurting the game. Don't get me wrong, I still miss the old toxicity, and players like LIS, DocE, MJ, the chaos and the butthole-ripping in the game. I wish we could still play somewhat like that and that the skin was thick enough for just a little of that some of the time from some people sometimes, but it's more important to me that we foster an environment that encourages a more than one-size playstyle. That would include "being mean" but I'll settle for not being mean myself in exchange for fostering some inclusion of noobs and other play styles. The noob class is actually probably our best chance at shaking things up. I hope that their inclusion also means some players return.
 
I didn’t get that it was about being clique-y at all? That wasn’t something I saw mentioned at all in dead chat last game. I’m confused.
It was more in the game thread my melt down. I didn't mention that I almost threatened to quit WW but something WZ said talked me down from the ledge.

And here I am playing another game :heckyeah:

But don't worry kids, WW isn't really addicting or anything.
 
no one really dies in ww. so the arguments are meaningless.
i have a job where death actually happens, so i appreciate being able to have arguments about stuff that doesn't really matter.
Which ironic, not sure what it says about my life that the meaningless arguments give my life meaning. I'm being a tad hyperbolic of course.
 
No, she was talking about how it's unfair how hard it was for the wolves last game to misyeet. Then repeated it again here.

But yes, the noob defense is incredibly out of character too especially given how justified and successful it was for village last game.
What was justified and successful last game?
 
She's been misyeeted once after playing multiple games. How are you reading her currently?

If you're low hanging fruit, then I'm low hanging fruit. Average our games together.
This last sentence, what are you even talking about?

So you're saying you're an easy misyeet target?
 
So what's the main takeaway from this post? I'm getting whiplash from seeing True shouldn't be pressured, to saying you often read him wrong, to saying you'll vote for him if others do, to saying he can't be wolfy this early on, to saying others misclear him.
I didn't like seeing you and Dubz on True. I didn't see a good reason for it, and said so.
 
I don't have a good read on true yet.

You and Dubz don't look so good so far in my estimation though.
I will never understand being bothered by pressure (especially less than halfway into a cycle) if you have no read on the target. It looks like whiteknighting or worse.

Why all the focus on me and dubz though? I've heard almost nothing about samac who you voted.
 
I will never understand being bothered by pressure (especially less than halfway into a cycle) if you have no read on the target. It looks like whiteknighting or worse.

Why all the focus on me and dubz though? I've heard almost nothing about samac who you voted.
My feelings on samac have changed but I haven't gotten around to doing anything about it

You do realize that between posts I'm responsible for another being's corporeal existence, right?

Mainly I’ve been more involved with fighting with you than anything else so I haven't had a chance to decide where to vote next
 
My feelings on samac have changed but I haven't gotten around to doing anything about it

You do realize that between posts I'm responsible for another being's corporeal existence, right?

Mainly I’ve been more involved with fighting with you than anything else so I haven't had a chance to decide where to vote next
Well, I wouldn't know that because you didn't mention it. How are you feeling about samac now?

You can still talk to other people in between talking to me. I've been doing that with no issue.
 
I was just about to unyeet Samac, but then got the feeling maybe that's what AM wants. The paranoia was triggered by her claim I'm white knighting True, which I know isn't possible since I'm not a wolf. But there is a certain irony to being accused of white knighting by someone in the same breath they criticize your vote on someone else.

I'm going to sit tight for now.
 
I was just about to unyeet Samac, but then got the feeling maybe that's what AM wants. The paranoia was triggered by her claim I'm white knighting True, which I know isn't possible since I'm not a wolf. But there is a certain irony to being accused of white knighting by someone in the same breath they criticize your vote on someone else.

I'm going to sit tight for now.
Who's criticizing your vote?
 
I will never understand being bothered by pressure (especially less than halfway into a cycle) if you have no read on the target. It looks like whiteknighting or worse.

Why all the focus on me and dubz though? I've heard almost nothing about samac who you voted.
The focus is because you and Dubz basically attacked me for saying I didn't see the point of/like the votes on True.

Which, I don't know the Aff of the 3 of you. Sure, TN could be a wolf. But it also occurred to me you and Dubz could be wolfing. The two of you on the same vote made me feel uncomfortable.

I walked that back a bit in light of Dubz' points, I no longer see the issue with her vote on True on terms of her explained rationale, however I agree with Visc it felt like she twisted my words. And it felt like you did as well. And if I wanted to decide your vote on True means little more than something that is part of a village agenda, being "misread" by you now is not really helping my read of you.

Would you and Dubz so boldly coordinate on True like this if you were wolfing together?

Well, why the hell not?
 
Well, I wouldn't know that because you didn't mention it. How are you feeling about samac now?

You can still talk to other people in between talking to me. I've been doing that with no issue.
I'm upset and all the spare time I have has been going to responding. I'm glad you're not upset and have more time to spend on the game.
 
The focus is because you and Dubz basically attacked me for saying I didn't see the point of/like the votes on True.

Which, I don't know the Aff of the 3 of you. Sure, TN could be a wolf. But it also occurred to me you and Dubz could be wolfing. The two of you on the same vote made me feel uncomfortable.

I walked that back a bit in light of Dubz' points, I no longer see the issue with her vote on True on terms of her explained rationale, however I agree with Visc it felt like she twisted my words. And it felt like you did as well. And if I wanted to decide your vote on True means little more than something that is part of a village agenda, being "misread" by you now is not really helping my read of you.

Would you and Dubz so boldly coordinate on True like this if you were wolfing together?

Well, why the hell not?
No, I attacked you for being sympathetic to limited misyeets. The goal isn't to misyeet unless you're not a villager.

Also why the "misread" in quotations?
 
No, I attacked you for being sympathetic to limited misyeets.

Also why the "misread" in quotations?
Because it's only a misread to find me sus if you're village. If you're wolf if it's not a misread but a fake misread. I'm like 40/60 right now on it being a true misread vs you're wolfing.
 
I'm upset and all the spare time I have has been going to responding. I'm glad you're not upset and have more time to spend on the game.
Could we not veer into personal attacks? I'm trying to evaluate this game and I can't do it by idling sitting until yeet close. I need interactions and I'll get them wherever I can.
 
You said I said little about samac who I am voting. This is an implied criticism of either the vote or my play.
It's called clarifying. It's not criticizing to simply ask why minimal attention is being given to a wolf read.
 
Top