That is the exact OPPOSITE of an answer to my question.
okay explain better to me what you want to know and I can answer your ?.
Outreach isnt a good bar of anything now. Most large hospital systems have purchased all the GI and Heme groups (and now many Uro groups) so all your good case volumes perhaps aside from Derm are entrapped in hospital contracts with their affiliate medical groups, which IMO is even better for us.
Why would I want to lean into OP cases? So Bostwick, Quest, some dirty competing group out of town can slowly predate on the offices??
Like OP vs. hospital site? I have business from over a 150 clinics and outpatient sites in a physical area that is larger than some states. Multiple rural "super deluxe" hospital contracts (*per GB eliteness hierarchy)
But OP is a literally a daily grind of customer service because they know they can call other labs to send their volume to. I would almost pass, aside from an important exceptions.
Not sure what granularity you are looking for or even why it is important to you.
Maybe you are confused: I do zero TC work. TC is garbage, total garbage. This was BEFORE the massive cuts coming. This is due to to my geographic location. Path assistants want like $120,000 and histotechs want like $100,000+ per year starting. Makes the entire TC proposal completely undoable once you factor in the costs of environmental compliance here in CA and the issues you can get into with employees, limitations on pension plans etc.
I did a deep dive once with some Fintech folks after the TC crash that came about from all the pod labs and the economy of scale needed is insane, like 20000 accessions minimum per year where I am located.
I would have a FRACTION of my current net worth if I had done full TC, but again Im sure it can be done well in other places, just not here.