- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 4,591
- Resident [Any Field]
what's the difference between an optometrist and an ophthalmologist?
what's the difference between an optometrist and an ophthalmologist?

This question is like going to the NP or Family Practice message boards and asking what's the difference between an NP and an FP?
One makes anywhere from 75 to 130-135,000 dollars employed working 5-6-7 days a week while treated as a second class citizen; while the other makes starting salary 250,000 to over a million dollars a year working less than the first although their malpractice is significantly much higher and overhead higher but treated as first class citizen. Hope this helps![]()
what's the difference between an optometrist and an ophthalmologist?
they pretty much are able to the same things...to some extent and the distinction between the two are quickly fading

one is a "fake" doctor other is "real", there I said it.
I agree with all the statements above (even the ones that were probably meant to be sarcastic).
ODs aren't douches whereas some ophthalmologists are.
You have just proved your own supposition to be wrong, with you there is at least one Douchebag optometrist. Oh, and there's always schunreek or whatever, so there's at least two.
As I've said many times, I'm a doctor like Julius Irving is a doctor but I get paid like a real one so I'm totally cool with it.

one is a "fake" doctor other is "real", there I said it.
I'm sure you wouldn't mind getting paid like Julius Irving during the peak of his career![]()
Do you mean physician? When you say doctor, what definition are you using? The one set by an MD/DO?
I personally think KHE would prefer to get paid like Dr. Shaquille O'Neil in his prime and not Dr. J 😉 (although being paid like Kobe/Lebron would be ideal)
Dude, please don't stir up this hornet nest. The "Are ODs real doctors or not" debate has been beaten like a punching bag, and nothing ever comes of it. If you're not comfortable being some for of "Dr" other than an MD, I suggest medical school.
Sadly, many pre-optometry students, who pursue a career in optometry, will likely be paid like a shoe salesman at Payless.
Dude, please don't stir up this hornet nest. The "Are ODs real doctors or not" debate has been beaten like a punching bag, and nothing ever comes of it. If you're not comfortable being some for of "Dr" other than an MD, I suggest medical school.
Huh? How am i stirring up anything? I didnt didnt comment as to whether an OD is a "real" doctor or not, I just dont understand why the term doctor refers exclusively to MD/DO. I would always call my professors in college Dr., im sure you call your OD, DMD/DDS, MD/DO all doctors. Lawyers and Pharmacists are also doctors. I always thought a doctor is someone who has a doctorate degree.
If my reasoning is incorrect, please explain to me what a doctor is, does and who the term is reserved for.
It's perfectly fine for anyone to call themselves a doctor outside the healthcare setting. But within a healthcare setting, most patients have certain assumptions of what a doctor is, and that is someone who has gone to medical school and residency. "Doctor" has become a vague term and so medical doctors will now often call themselves physicians. When optometry groups, call themselves "optometric physicians" and push legislation that will allow them to label themselves as physicians, it certainly appears like they're intentionally trying to mislead the public.
The reaction most ophthalmologists have when an optometrist says or implies that they're equivalent to an ophthalmologist is probably similar to the reaction you would have should an optician or ophthalmic tech say that they're good enough to be primary eye care providers.
Why? Calling an ophthalmologist a douche because he says ODs are fake doctors makes me a douche? Don't think so.
When optometry groups, call themselves "optometric physicians" and push legislation that will allow them to label themselves as physicians, it certainly appears like they're intentionally trying to mislead the public.
The reaction most ophthalmologists have when an optometrist says or implies that they're equivalent to an ophthalmologist is probably similar to the reaction you would have should an optician or ophthalmic tech say that they're good enough to be primary eye care providers.
It's perfectly fine for anyone to call themselves a doctor outside the healthcare setting. But within a healthcare setting, most patients have certain assumptions of what a doctor is, and that is someone who has gone to medical school and residency. "Doctor" has become a vague term and so medical doctors will now often call themselves physicians. When optometry groups, call themselves "optometric physicians" and push legislation that will allow them to label themselves as physicians, it certainly appears like they're intentionally trying to mislead the public.
The reaction most ophthalmologists have when an optometrist says or implies that they're equivalent to an ophthalmologist is probably similar to the reaction you would have should an optician or ophthalmic tech say that they're good enough to be primary eye care providers.
You really didn't make it clear that you were referring to any specific individual. You just made a blanket statement implying that ophthalmologists can be douchebags, while optometrists cannot. Pretty douchey.