question is attached.
#1. which is the right decreasing order of allyl stability?
=> answer is B, but I think the answer is E.
the stability of allyl is... substituted ally > tertiary > allyl > secondary > primary > vinyl.
right? do you guys agree that?
#2. two isomers of the same molecular formula are closest in physical and chemical properties when jointly exhibiting
a. conformational isomer
b. enantiomeric isomer
=> the answer is a. why not b? because enantiomers have the same (not closest) physical and chemical properties?
#3. the explanation of the question #2 was as follows...
"isomers of the same molecular fomula can be arranged with increasing order of differences in physical and chemical properties outlined as follows...
conformational isomers > enantiomers > diastereomers and geometric isomers > constitutional isomers"
do you agree this? I think enantiomers have exactly the same physical and chemical properties, but conformational isomers have a slightly different physical and chemical properties.
#1. which is the right decreasing order of allyl stability?
=> answer is B, but I think the answer is E.
the stability of allyl is... substituted ally > tertiary > allyl > secondary > primary > vinyl.
right? do you guys agree that?
#2. two isomers of the same molecular formula are closest in physical and chemical properties when jointly exhibiting
a. conformational isomer
b. enantiomeric isomer
=> the answer is a. why not b? because enantiomers have the same (not closest) physical and chemical properties?
#3. the explanation of the question #2 was as follows...
"isomers of the same molecular fomula can be arranged with increasing order of differences in physical and chemical properties outlined as follows...
conformational isomers > enantiomers > diastereomers and geometric isomers > constitutional isomers"
do you agree this? I think enantiomers have exactly the same physical and chemical properties, but conformational isomers have a slightly different physical and chemical properties.