Not sure if this is an advertising thread or not (i.e. did someone from this company start this thread?).
I downloaded this app when it was released. I was pretty unimpressed with it. The concept could be good, but the content isn't.
I'm not sure if it's been updated/expanded, but when I opened it...it only had maybe 200 questions. It had answer explanations but they were generally short and not too detailed (i.e. this is no UWorld where you end up learning 10 additional facts and concepts just by taking the time to read the explanations thoroughly). They have teamed up with the ACP to offer internal medicine questions, so there's probably hope that they'll have better questions/explanations in the future.
Overall, I got the sense that the questions were designed to learn small facts and retain them. This approach is fine, but you need more than 200 questions to justify being relevant. Other question banks (i.e. UWorld) train you to memorize both facts and concepts so you retain them with a broader understanding. The explanations are richer, and they tell you not only why one answer is right, but why the others are wrong. I could see this being mildly helpful during 1st and 2nd year while you're trying to cram info, but you can't expect this is going to be very helpful with only a few hundred questions covering the entirety of the pre-clinical curriculum.
@FirefighterDoc, the app is only on iOS right now so if you have an iPhone, iPad, or iPod you'll be good to use it. No trial period, we just haven't released the second larger set of preclinical questions yet.
@MDEast and oncology2020, trust us in that we did not start the thread, @FirefighterDoc, who appears to be an MS1 at Midwestern's CCOM, began the thread. Since we're medical students too we follow SDN so wanted to be proactive if any questions came up. We're trying to build a movement in medical education, not just sell a product, and it's our job to convince you of that.
@MDEast, the initial set of 200 questions and the upcoming 1,000 questions are primarily meant for MS1s and MS2s who have few-to-no alternatives in terms of reasonably-priced, innovative, and multimedia-rich questions. We aren't aiming to be a UWorld or Kaplan, and certainly don't want to charge $100/month for access to questions whose costs of production and delivery are miniscule.
We'll be releasing more question sets through our partnerships with publishers, such as the American College of Physicians which you pointed out (MS3s and MS4s are in for a treat). Many of these sets will have more detailed explanations, though one unique element of our initial set is the number of images and videos which serve to reinforce concepts by offering context, whether it's a patient story, doctor interview, mnemonic, hand-drawn tutorial, or knowledge rap.
You may have heard the analogy of the forest versus trees, or put another way the cathedral versus stones. A good physicians will understand the big picture, that is they will see and appreciate the cathedral. However, to get there they need to first build up the edifice using stones, or individual concepts and facts that then serve as their foundation. Though Osmosis is providing a few hundred starter stones, and through our partners many thousand more in the coming weeks, the most accurate way to view us is not only as the stones, but as the mortar that holds them together. We are accomplishing this through our novel delivery algorithms and beautiful design.
Thanks for your interests and please do get in touch with any additional feedback or ideas.
Best,
Shiv, on behalf of the Osmosis Team