- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
- Messages
- 1,514
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 4,531
The large number of board failures is definitely a concern. I'm sure changes will be made, but again - is it in time for the current students to see them? Probably not. Keeping in mind that the final tally for board scores for that class wasn't complete until sometime in the fall, the current academic year was already underway. So, too late for substantial changes to be made for this academic year. I guarantee you, though, that changes are and will be made. Most students don't realize it, but a curriculum review for both pathways is currently in progress.
Yes, that must be why the director of the IP program came in on the first day of med 2 classes this year, and announced that his committee had found "nothing wrong with the IP cirriculum", conveniently absolving himself of all responsibility in the process. According to him, there was too much distraction on account of TV and video gaming happening in the world responsible for the atrocious performance of the class of 2007 on the board exams, which he could not be held responsible for. The only thing they've changed as a token gesture are the passing rates, which - for your class - sucks. They haven't made any useful changes like giving the class more time to study for the board exam... Or an end of year review course that - unlike Capstone - is actually useful.
As to whether or not it was the students or the curriculum . . . well - who knows. Suffice it to say that the administration was NOT happy with the results and IS looking into what needs to be done so that it doesn't happen again. I have talked with professors who have taught at OSU for many, many years who said that that particular class was one of the least academically inclined classes they had ever taught (didn't come to class, didn't study, didn't do well on class tests, etc). The more convincing evidence for me was talking to some of the STUDENTS in this class who said that most of the people that they knew who failed the boards didn't study hardly at all (for class OR the boards) and partied all the time.
Yes, if this was such a loser class they wouldn't have had such high MCAT scores and GPAs. What you think these people decided at the age of 23-25 to suddenly become irresponsible party youth? Or start playing video games 40 hours a week as Hitchcock claimed? Whatever. More of the administration shrugging responsibility off itself.


