- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 82
- Reaction score
- 0
So, forgive me if I'm behind the times, but I've recently heard that passive stretching isn't all its cracked up to be. Apparently some think its detrimental to active contraction. "They" say all a muscle needs it to be adequately warmed up and ready for activity, but not stretched.
This goes against everything I've learned from participating in high school sports through my AT program, which stressed passive stretching and PNF stretching. I realize both get results by neurological relaxation (autogenic inhibition/ reciprocal inhibition) and no true "lenghtening" occurs. Does that actually hurt active contraction though?
Obviously I don't know the specifics behind this train of thought aka why is it (passive stretching) bad. Anyone have more info?
This goes against everything I've learned from participating in high school sports through my AT program, which stressed passive stretching and PNF stretching. I realize both get results by neurological relaxation (autogenic inhibition/ reciprocal inhibition) and no true "lenghtening" occurs. Does that actually hurt active contraction though?
Obviously I don't know the specifics behind this train of thought aka why is it (passive stretching) bad. Anyone have more info?