How do you know that PBL is your style of learning? You've never experienced it. You have an idea that it may work for you, but you really can't say for sure until you're there. PBL is not equivalent to hands on learning, in the sense that you actually touch an animal. PBL is a lot of sitting in a room working up simulated cases with a small group under the guidance of a facilitator. Not to knock PBL- I think it's important, and I believe the earlier students are introduced to problem-based veterinary medicine, the better off they are for fourth year and beyond (that being said, traditional lecture has its place as well). You make a point of stating that you learn best by 'doing things hands on.' It's important for you to realize that PBL is not tactile. It's hands on in the sense that you're looking at data, but the case subject is nowhere to be seen. Early PBL in a curriculum is challenging to students because they (we) don't have the background knowledge to begin setting up accurate problem lists. Say, for example, that your prof hands you a photo of a foal's lung that has a bunch of white, splotchy dots on it and provides a bit of history on the foal (respiratory problems, poor doer, etc.). To really work this case PBL style, you need to know the top 4-5 differential diagnoses that would cause this disease presentation in a foal of that age. Looking at the diseased foal doesn't necessarily help you (first, because your prof provided you with the relevant history you need to arrive at the answer) and secondly, you don't have the experience to link clinical signs to pathomechanism.
In a PBL curriculum (folks from Western and Cornell, please chime in here- because this hasn't been my experience), you would need to independently search for what those differentials would be, and match them to the foal's clinical signs (researching all of this information independently in reference materials). What if you miss something? You might, because you have no idea what's going on a lot of the time. In a traditional curriculum, you would have had classes on infectious disease, so may remember a few of the foal respiratory diseases that would match the subject's pattern. You'll also have to do a bunch of research/review here because you'll never remember everything you covered in infectious disease (virology, bac-T, and parasit). Both curricular styles accomplish the same objective- training students to think about clinical problems in a structured manner. That's just how medicine is done. Whether or not you're sourcing the info you need to solve cases independently (PBL) versus lecture, you arrive at the same endpoint. Please note that no sick foal was seen during the above interaction. You got a photo of the lung, some info on the clinical signs, and were sent on your way to solve the case. That is how PBL works.