Hi everyone, long time lurker, created an account to post a quick note:
I am a current CA-3, who matched into Peds anesthesia this past cycle. All the usual advice applies, eg. apply broadly, and go where you think you'll fit best, etc. But in this case, I do think national reputation matters more than in residency, and I'll explain why:
I felt there was a huge disparity between the very 'top' national programs (not going to name names or argue about that), and the middle of the road / lesser programs, in the match rate, and I'd imagine the quality of applicants.
This year's peds anesthesia match left almost half, or 24 total programs, unfilled (42%). I'm not sure if the ACGME rules allow me to post which ones did not even fill a single spot, but there were many, including a few I interviewed at and seemed fine.
The caliber of people interviewing whom I met at those top 4-5 Children's hospitals were outstanding, and I just got a feeling that there is a large rift developing in the (perceived) quality of peds anesthesia graduates when looking for jobs afterwards, and I'd recommend considering reputation and training with really sick children and complicated cases when making your decision, more so than with your residency decision. It's only one year, and for that reason I figured I could tolerate the cold northeast.
Sorry if that was rambling, and if anyone is a peds anesthesia attending I would love to hear your thoughts on the match rates, or whatever else you would like.