-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
- Home
- Forums
- Physician and Resident Communities (MD / DO)
- Internal Medicine and IM Subspecialties
- Cardiology
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Penn Cardiology
Started by infarct
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Was similarly confused by the place last year.
Seems like people who interview there either love the place or leave confused.
i have only interviewed at Penn once (for residency)_ from what my cardiology friends tell me, its pretty high volume and uber-strong in EP ( Marchilinski, Epstein etc). Other specialities are very strong to excellent. The fellowship is quite busy. Moreover, there is little hand-holding in terms of mentorship: if you know what you want to do and go for it, you will be fine.. but ain't that how most 'big' places in cardiology tend to be (with brigham, mayo, duke being few exceptions).
i have not seen a lot of penn fellows being as well published as ppl from duke or brigham.
Nonetheless the program is outstanding for clinical training (like 20% other programs in the country 🙂 ), but has the brand name recognition. Clearly a top 10-15 program, some may argue a top 5 clinical program..
i have only interviewed at Penn once (for residency)_ from what my cardiology friends tell me, its pretty high volume and uber-strong in EP ( Marchilinski, Epstein etc). Other specialities are very strong to excellent. The fellowship is quite busy. Moreover, there is little hand-holding in terms of mentorship: if you know what you want to do and go for it, you will be fine.. but ain't that how most 'big' places in cardiology tend to be (with brigham, mayo, duke being few exceptions).
i have not seen a lot of penn fellows being as well published as ppl from duke or brigham.
Nonetheless the program is outstanding for clinical training (like 20% other programs in the country 🙂 ), but has the brand name recognition. Clearly a top 10-15 program, some may argue a top 5 clinical program..
that's all fine...but do you get cocats level two training?...that they never really answered
that's all fine...but do you get cocats level two training?...that they never really answered
I agree, they were very vague in addressing cocats, seemed to avoid answering it directly.
Here are the requirements for the COCATS - Does anyone really think that at a high volume place like PENN, the fellows will have any problems getting level 2 in echo, nuclear, or cath?
I thought the fellowship was 2 years- it says three. Is that essential for cocats 2
I thought the fellowship was 2 years- it says three. Is that essential for cocats 2
Nope, and some are even 4
Here are the requirements for the COCATS - Does anyone really think that at a high volume place like PENN, the fellows will have any problems getting level 2 in echo, nuclear, or cath?
I think Penn does allow their fellows to get level 2 in a number of modalities, but they weren't clear on the interview day.
Generally speaking though, I'd just warn that you can get fooled by volume. Some programs have great volume but they don't allow their fellows to schedule the appropriate amount of clinical time to meet COCATS requirements.
Generally speaking, Penns known for being really strong in EP (arguably, the top program in the country) and being really strong in heart failure. I'd buy it if someone told me it's a top 10 cards program or if it's a top 10-15 program.
Don't think it really matters at the end of the day.