- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 6
Pros and Cons of attending each? Similar cost, and unsure of specializing. Any input appreciated!!
What do you think about living in Pennsylvania versus New York? Where are you from originally?I may be a bit biased but here goes...
Unless you want to do OMFS, I’d go to Penn. You’ll be getting more clinical exposure while still getting a strong basic science curriculum. At Penn, we start assisting in the clinic our first semester and do that through our second year. It makes adjusting to clinic such a smooth transition, and it’s nice to already be a part of treating patients.
Another big thing I’d think about is the fact that at Penn, we have our own dedicated dental faculty that oversees our curriculum. My girlfriend attends Columbia and in my opinion, Penn’s curriculum is more organized and thought out better. It’s not necessarily Columbia’s fault, but it’s what happens when dental students take classes with medical students.
Also, West Philly >>> Washington heights. Penn is right on the undergrad campus next to plenty of other graduate schools. Washington heights can definitely get suspect at times.
Not valid. Penn matches plenty of people into OMFS. People have the argument that the medical school curriculum was a game changer. Not to the degree you may think. You still need to put in the time to prepare for the CBSE. Penn students tend to do very well on the CBSE. My year, 9 of us had 75+ on it. A little bit of grade inflation helps too. In recent years Columbia's OMFS numbers have been ridiculous, and kudos to them for that.Unless you want to do OMFS, I’d go to Penn..
Fair. I'd agree that Penn's basic science is stronger than most schools, since they really do push for specialization. I remember feeling bad for the people that wanted to do general dentistry. All conversations were about specialization. It got annoying. But DAU ("early clinical exposure") can be hit or miss as times. I'm not sure what year you are at Penn but I'd like to know what your thoughts were on DAU. Some found it valuable, other found it a waste. I was probably somewhere in the middle.IYou’ll be getting more clinical exposure while still getting a strong basic science curriculum.
That transition of having no responsibilities + suctioning to actually scheduling and treating pts are two very different things. It familiarizes you with the clinic atmosphere and the potential clinical group you will be in, but nothing prepares you for actually being in clinic.It makes adjusting to clinic such a smooth transition, and it’s nice to already be a part of treating patients.
Can you expand upon how Penn's didactic curriculum is stronger than most schools? Did you go to Penn?
I may be a bit biased but here goes...
Unless you want to do OMFS, I’d go to Penn. You’ll be getting more clinical exposure while still getting a strong basic science curriculum. At Penn, we start assisting in the clinic our first semester and do that through our second year. It makes adjusting to clinic such a smooth transition, and it’s nice to already be a part of treating patients.
Another big thing I’d think about is the fact that at Penn, we have our own dedicated dental faculty that oversees our curriculum. My girlfriend attends Columbia and in my opinion, Penn’s curriculum is more organized and thought out better. It’s not necessarily Columbia’s fault, but it’s what happens when dental students take classes with medical students.
Also, West Philly >>> Washington heights. Penn is right on the undergrad campus next to plenty of other graduate schools. Washington heights can definitely get suspect at times.
Not to hate but this is so biased...I go to Columbia and we start clinic in our first semester too? Our preclinical is where we actually see patients so that helps. And also, I personally think our curriculum is very well laid out. No one in my class has EVER complained about the curriculum schedule. The Pass/Fail nature and the block exam schedule make it very easy to follow and manage.