- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey guys,
I'm kinda hoping for some thoughts on an issue I'm having...
I wrote a personal statement (AMCAS) that, in itself, is very honest and relatively humble, with a strong emphasis on the humanistic motives behind my decision to pursue an MD/PhD, but, clearly one that revolves around my motives for going into research. Without tooting my own horn, I feel it's a good piece of writing, and I wouldn't feel any hesitation to send it in today.
I did however decide to take up a professor of mine up on his offer to read it. Now, I was aware from the very start that he's a pure PhD (cognitive psychology).... And, true enough, his comments were right along the lines of 'too personal, too modest', not enough about specific research goals, etc. It's funny, because he clearly states that the 'part in the middle' where I talk about my research motivations and what I've done is great, while the 'beginning and the end' (where I relate it to the practice of medicine) is 'not needed'.
Of course, it is inherent in the nature of our pursuit (MD/PhD), that the picture we are trying to paint is more complex than that. I think we all face the daunting task of explaining why we want to do both, while catering to both MDs and PhDs. So I figured that my AMCAS essay should be of this tone, and I would save the hard-core research for the MD/PhD essay (secondary). I'm not sure if he realizes that there is another specific essay.
Is this a good strategy?
I don't want to lose an MD that screens my essay due to the lack of personal reasons, but I don't want some researcher squinting at the lack of empirical pursuits.
Serge
I'm kinda hoping for some thoughts on an issue I'm having...
I wrote a personal statement (AMCAS) that, in itself, is very honest and relatively humble, with a strong emphasis on the humanistic motives behind my decision to pursue an MD/PhD, but, clearly one that revolves around my motives for going into research. Without tooting my own horn, I feel it's a good piece of writing, and I wouldn't feel any hesitation to send it in today.
I did however decide to take up a professor of mine up on his offer to read it. Now, I was aware from the very start that he's a pure PhD (cognitive psychology).... And, true enough, his comments were right along the lines of 'too personal, too modest', not enough about specific research goals, etc. It's funny, because he clearly states that the 'part in the middle' where I talk about my research motivations and what I've done is great, while the 'beginning and the end' (where I relate it to the practice of medicine) is 'not needed'.
Of course, it is inherent in the nature of our pursuit (MD/PhD), that the picture we are trying to paint is more complex than that. I think we all face the daunting task of explaining why we want to do both, while catering to both MDs and PhDs. So I figured that my AMCAS essay should be of this tone, and I would save the hard-core research for the MD/PhD essay (secondary). I'm not sure if he realizes that there is another specific essay.
Is this a good strategy?
I don't want to lose an MD that screens my essay due to the lack of personal reasons, but I don't want some researcher squinting at the lack of empirical pursuits.
Serge