- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 7
A few friends and I were recently discussing the general topic of a personal statement and how integral it is to the post graduate application process for further education. As many of you know, not only is it important but it serves as the not-too-formal portion of the application by which one is able to introduce him or herself to the Admissions Board. It often requires one to form a summation of their own life by explaining how they have overcome certain obstacles or hardships. Within the vein of this nature, we began discussing possible adversities by which to write and found that we and for the most part most of those who will apply to medical school, do not have “extreme” cases of hardships. At least none that would be considered original.
That being said, this particular question was raised: “How personal is too personal for a statement”?
The golden consensus among us was that if you would not mention a particular experience in an interview, then it should not written as part of a statement. This means that perhaps discussing a messy divorce might be in bad “taste”. Yet, is not the purpose of the statement to introduce one’s character to their potential school of choice? If a person has been through an unfortunate, extreme circumstance such as rape and it has somehow served as the precedent in inspiring them to become a physician, is it appropriate to write? While extreme circumstances can be considered taboo, it is possible for them to define a person emphatically, especially if it has changed the trajectory of their career path? What if their only adversity is sensitive in topic? Do you agree with the our general consensus? For the sake of debate, I thought this would be interesting to see everyone’s opinions on the matter.
If you maintained a seat on a medical school’s admissions board, “How personal is too personal for a statement”?
That being said, this particular question was raised: “How personal is too personal for a statement”?
The golden consensus among us was that if you would not mention a particular experience in an interview, then it should not written as part of a statement. This means that perhaps discussing a messy divorce might be in bad “taste”. Yet, is not the purpose of the statement to introduce one’s character to their potential school of choice? If a person has been through an unfortunate, extreme circumstance such as rape and it has somehow served as the precedent in inspiring them to become a physician, is it appropriate to write? While extreme circumstances can be considered taboo, it is possible for them to define a person emphatically, especially if it has changed the trajectory of their career path? What if their only adversity is sensitive in topic? Do you agree with the our general consensus? For the sake of debate, I thought this would be interesting to see everyone’s opinions on the matter.
If you maintained a seat on a medical school’s admissions board, “How personal is too personal for a statement”?